Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:26:25.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breeding for host plant resistance to maize stem-borers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

John A. Mihm
John A. Mihm
Affiliation:
CIMMYT, Apartado Postal 6–641, 06600 Mexico, D.F., Mexico
Get access

Abstract

The information available on the genetics, breeding, and utilization of host plant resistance to 14 of the most important species of maize stem-borers complex, their biology, and the damage done to the crop is presented.

The components necessary for implementing a programme for breeding for resistance to stem-borers in maize include: a colony of the pest(s), the capability to mass rear them, uniform artificial infestation methods, an array of the available maize germplasm or related species, rating scales and evaluation methods that permit identification of genetic resistance, knowledge of screening and breeding methods, and the personnel and resources to execute the programme.

The paper having emphasized the importance of each component, concludes with a discussion of several HPR programmes and the breeding methods being used in various areas of the world, to develop and utilize resistance to one or more maize pests, as a proven method for gaining increased management control over these pests.

Résumé

L'information disponible concernant la génétique, la sélection et l'utilisation de plantes hotes résistantes à 14 des plus importantes espèces de larves mineuses de la tige de maïs est résumée. On passe en revue l'information concernant complexe parasite larves mineuses, leur biologies, et les dégats quélles causent aux cultures.

Les composantes indispensables à la mise en oeuvre d'un programme de sélection pour la résistance aus larves mineuses chez le maïs sont les suivantes: avoir une (ou des) colonie de parasites, la possibilite de le (ou les) élever en grande quantité, une méthode d'infestation uniforme, une gamme représentant le matériel génétique despondible pour cette plante voire des espèces apparentées, une échelle de notation et d'évaluation qui permet de mettre en évidence des résistances de type génétique, une connaissance des méthodes et des cribles de sélection, le personnel et les fonds pour une bonne éxecution du programme.

Cet article, après avoir détaillé l'importance de chacunes de ces composantes, conclut par une discussion sur les différents programmes de sélection de plantes hôtes résistantes et sur les méthodes utilisées de part le monde, programmes qui développent et utilisent la résistance génétique comme partie intégrante de la lutte contre ces parasites.

Keywords

BreedingBusseolaChiloDiatraeaElasmopalpusEldanahost plant resistanceOstriniascreeningselectionSesamia
Type
Section IV: Plant breeding for insect resistance
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 6 , Special Issue 3: Host Plant Resistance and its Significance in Pest Management , June 1985 , pp. 369 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Awadallah, W. H. (1980) The development and use of varietal resistance and other non-chemical control methods to reduce yield losses due to stalk borers in maize. Third Annual Report. Project FG-EG-170.Google Scholar
Barry, B. D., Zuber, M. S., Antonio, A. Q. and Darrah, L. L. (1983) Selection for resistance to the second generation of the European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in maize. J. econ. Ent. 76, 392–394.Google Scholar
Chiang, M. S. and Hudon, M. (1976) A study of maize inbred lines for their resistance to the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis. Phytoprotection 57, 36–40.Google Scholar
Dabrowski, Z. T. and Nyangiri, E. O. (1984) Some field and screenhouse experiments on maize resistance to Chilo partellus under Western Kenya conditions. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 109–118.Google Scholar
Davis, F. M. and Scott, G. E. (1974) Flow chart for a hypothetical host plant resistance program. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Dicke, F. F. (1977) The most important corn insects. In Corn and Corn Improvement (Edited by Sprague, G. F.), pp. 501–590. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Dicke, F. F. and Guthrie, W. D. (1978) Genetics of insect resistance in maize. In Maize Breeding and Genetics (Edited by Walden, D. D.), pp. 299–317. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Dolinka, B. (Ed.) (1976) Report of the International Project on Ostrinia nubilalis. Phase III. Results. Information Centre of Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
Everly, R. T. (1967) Establishment and development of corn leaf aphid populations on inbred and single cross dent corn. Proc. N. Cent. Br. ent. Soc. Am. 22, 80–84.Google Scholar
Gallun, R. L., Starks, K. J. and Guthrie, W. D. (1975) Plant resistance to insects attacking cereals. A. Rev. Ent. 20, 337–357.Google Scholar
Grier, S. L. and Davis, D. W. (1980) Infestation procedures and heritability of characters used to estimate ear damage caused by second brood European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hubner) on corn. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, W. D. (1980) Breeding for resistance to insects in corn. In Biology and Breeding for Resistance to Arthropods and Pathogens in Agricultural Plants (Edited by Harris, M. K.), pp. 290–302. Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. D. (1982) Progress up-date in HPR (European corn borer). Fifth Biennial Plant Resistance to Insects Workshop, Brownsville, Texas, 24–26 February 1982.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. D. and Stringfield, G. H. (1961) The recovery of genes controlling corn borer resistance in a backcrossing program. J. econ. Ent. 54, 267–270.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. D. and Dicke, F. F. (1972) Resistance of inbred lines of dent corn to leaf feeding by first brood European corn borers. Iowa St. J. Sci. 46, 339–357.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. D. and Barry, B. D. (1983) Evaluation of a mutable system for inducing resistance to European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in susceptible inbred lines of dent maize. J. Kansas Ent. Soc. 56, 552–554.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. D., Dicke, F. F. and Nieswander, C. R. (1960) Leaf and sheath feeding resistance to the European corn borer in eight inbred lines of dent corn. Ohio Agric. exp. Stn Res. Bull. No. 860.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. D., Tseng, C. T., Knole, J. and Jarvis, J. L. (1982) European corn borer and maize chlorotic dwarf virus resistance-susceptibility in inbred lines of dent maize. Maydica 27, 221–233.Google Scholar
Hallauer, A. R. and Miranda, J. B. (1981) Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Hardin, B. (1984) Corn germplasm resists corn borers. Agric. Res. p. 14.Google Scholar
Hatchett, J. H. and Gallun, R. L. (1970) Genetics of the ability of the Hessian fly, Myetiola destructor, to survive on wheats having different genes for resistance. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63, 1400–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedin, P. A., Davis, F. M., Williams, W. P. and Salin, M. L. (1984) Possible factors of leaf feeding resistance in corn to the southwestern corn borer. J. agric. Fd Chem. 32, 262–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IITA (1980) Cereal Improvement Program—Maize. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture. Annual Report for 1979. Ibadan, Nigeria, pp. 107–116.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. N. (1979) Breeding for insect resistance. In Plant Breeding II (Edited by Frey, K. J.), pp. 291–308. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. W., Rosenow, D. T. and Teetes, G. L. (1973) Resistance to the sorghum midge in converted exotic sorghum cultivars. Crop Sci. 13, 754–755.Google Scholar
King, E. G. and Leppla, N. C. (Eds) (1984) Advances and Challenges in Insect Rearing. USDA ARS, New Orleans, LA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mihm, J. A. (1982) Techniques for efficient mass rearing and infestation in screening for host plant resistance to corn earworm, Heliothis zea. CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico.Google Scholar
Mihm, J. A. (1983a) Efficient mass rearing and infestation techniques to screen for host plant resistance to maize stem borers, Diatraea spp. CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico.Google Scholar
Mihm, J. A. (1983b) Efficient mass rearing and infestation techniques to screen for resistance to fall armyworm, Spodoplera frugiperda. CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico.Google Scholar
Montllor, C. B., Campbell, B. C. and Mittler, T. E. (1983) Natural and induced differences in probing behavior of two biotypes of the greenbug, Shizaphis graminum, in relation to resistance in sorghum. Entomologia exp. appl. 34, 99–106.Google Scholar
Nielson, M. W. and Lehman, W. F. (1980) Breeding approaches in alfalfa. In Breeding Plants Resistant to Insects (Edited by Maxwell, F. G. and Jennings, P. R.), pp. 279–311. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Omolo, E. O. (1983) Screening of local and exotic maize lines for stem borer resistance with special referrence to Chilo Partellus. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 105–108.Google Scholar
Ortega, A., Vasal, S. K., Mihm, J. A. and Hershey, C. (1980) Plants Resistant to Insects (Edited by Maxwell, F. G. and Jennings, P. R.), pp. 371–419. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Penny, L. H., Scott, G. E. and Guthrie, W. D. (1967) Recurrent selection for European corn borer resistance in maize. Crop Sci. 7, 407–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojanaridpiched, C. and Gracen, V. E. (1983) Mechanisms of resistance to the European corn borer in maize. A. Pl. Resist. Insects Newsl. 9, 33–34.Google Scholar
Russell, W. A. (1975) Breeding and genetics in the control of insect pests. Iowa St. J. Res. 49, 527–551.Google Scholar
Russell, W. A., Guthrie, W. D. and Grindland, R. L. (1974) Breeding for resistance in maize to first and second broods of the European corn borer. Crop Sci. 14, 725–727.Google Scholar
Russell, W. A., Lawrence, G. D. and Guthrie, W. D. (1979) Effects of recurrent selection for European corn borer resistance on other agronomic characters in synthetic cultivars of maize. Maydica 24, 33–47.Google Scholar
Sarup, P. (1980) Insect pest management in maize. In Breeding, Production and Protection Methodologies of Maize in India (Edited by Singh, J.), pp. 193–197. All India Co-ordinated Maize Improvement Project, IARI, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Scott, G. E. and Davis, F. M. (1976) Breeding for resistance to the southwestern corn borer. Proc. Corn & Sorghum Res. Conf. 31, 118–128.Google Scholar
Scriber, J. M., Tingey, W. W., Gracen, V. E. and Sullivan, S. L. (1975) Leaf feeding resistance to the European corn borer in genotypes of tropical (low DIMBOA) and U.S. Inbred (high DIMBOA) maize. J. econ. Ent. 68, 823–826.Google Scholar
Singh, J. (1983) Breeding for resistance to insect pests of maize. In Techniques of Scoring for Resistance to the Major Insect Pests of Maize (Edited by Singh, J.), pp. 1–15. All India Co-ordinated Maize Improvement Project, IARI, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Singh, J. (1977) Artificial Diets for Insects, Mites, and Spiders. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sprague, G. F. (Ed.) (1977) Corn and Corn Improvement. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisc.Google Scholar
Sullivan, S. L., Gracen, V. E. and Ortega, A. (1974) Resistance of exotic maize varieties to the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hubner). Environ. Ent. 3, 718–720.Google Scholar
Teetes, G. L., Shaefer, C. A., Johnson, J. W. and Rosenow, D. T. (1974) Resistance in sorghums to the greenbug: field evaluation Crop Sci. 14, 706–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasal, S. K., Ortega, A. C. and Pandey, S. (1982) CIMMYT's maize germplasm management, improvement, and utilization program. CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico.Google Scholar
Wet, J. M. J. de (1979) Tripsacum introgression and agronomic fitness in maize (Zea mays L.). Proceedings of the Conference on Broadening Genetic Base of Crops, pp. 203–209. Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Widstrom, N. W., Wiser, W. J. and Baumann, L. F. (1970) Recurrent selection in maize for earworm resistance. Crop Sci. 10, 674–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widstrom, N. W., Wiseman, B. R. and McMillian, W. W. (1972) Resistance among some maize inbreds and single crosses to fall armyworm injury. Crop Sci. 12, 290–292.Google Scholar
Widstrom, N. W. and McMillian, W. W. (1973) Genetic effects conditioning resistance to earworm in maize. Crop Sci. 13, 459–461.Google Scholar
Widstrom, N. W., Hanson, W. D. and Redlinger, M. L. (1975) Inheritance of maize weevil resistance in maize. Crop Sci. 15, 467–470.Google Scholar
Widstrom, N. W., Wiseman, and McMillian, W. W. (1984) Registration of GT-R14 maize germplasm. Crop Sci. 24, 626.Google Scholar
Williams, W. P. and Davis, F. M. (1983) Recurrent selection for resistance in corn to tunnelling by the second brood southwestern corn borer. Crop Sci. 23, 169–170.Google Scholar
Williams, W. P., Davis, F. M. and Scott, G. E. (1978) Resistance of corn to leaf feeding damage by the fall armyworm. Crop Sci. 18, 861–863.Google Scholar
Wiseman, B. R., Davis, F. M. and Campbell, J. E. (1980) Mechanical infestation device used in fall armyworm plant resistance programs. Fla Ent. 63, 425–432.Google Scholar
Zuber, M. S., Fairchild, M. L., Keaster, A. J., Fergason, V. L., Krause, G. F., Hilderbrand, E. and Loesch, P. J. Jr (1971) Evaluation of ten generations of mass selection for corn earworm resistance. Crop Sci. 11, 16–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar