Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:53:14.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biology, natural enemies and damage of the sugarcane whitefly (Neomaskellia andropogonis) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2018

Alireza Askarianzadeh  and
Mehrnoosh Minaeimoghadam
Alireza Askarianzadeh*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, College of Agricultural Sciences, Shahed University, PO Box 18151/159, Tehran, Iran
Mehrnoosh Minaeimoghadam
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, College of Agricultural Sciences, Shahid Chamran University, Ahwaz, Iran
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An outbreak of the sugarcane whitefly (Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett) recently occurred in sugarcane fields in Khuzestan Province of Iran. This pest sucks plant sap producing large amounts of honeydew. In Khuzestan Province, populations of all developmental stages increase from early August until late November. At this time, when sugarcane is at the ripening stage, nymphs suck the sap, and in cases of severe infestation, retard the growth of sugarcane plants. In this study, we investigated the biology of the pest on different cultivars of sugarcane and under different temperatures. Also, we conducted experiments to determine the damage caused by the pest in the field. Mean pre-adult developmental times were 24.09, 28.06, 27.27 and 26.64 days on CP69-1062, CP57-1062, CP48-103 and NCO-310 cultivars, respectively, and only female progeny were produced. Mean longevity of females on the four cultivars was 6, 8.49, 4.15 and 4.60 days, respectively. Adult females laid an average of 61.80, 58.80, 41.10 and 39.38 eggs on the four cultivars, respectively. Results show that the optimum temperature for development of different stages of N. andropogonis is 30±1°C during the day and 25±1°C at night, and at this temperature, egg and nymphal duration (including first, second, third instars and pupae) and adult longevity were 6.2, 17.0 and 7.6 days, respectively. Females of cultivar CP69-1062 laid an average of 50.09 eggs. Analysis of data on the quality of damage (including Brix, pol and refined sugar factors) shows that damage was inversely and significantly correlated with the number of infested leaves. Whitefly damage differed among cultivars; and, based on the quality of damage, early maturing cultivars were more susceptible to whitefly damage. We collected two parasitoid wasps from nymphs—Encarsia inaron (Walker) (Hym.: Aphelinidae) and Eretmocerus delhiensis Mani (Hym.: Aphelinidae). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the biology, damage and natural enemies of N. andropogonis on sugarcane in Iran.

Keywords

SugarcaneNeomaskellia andropogonisbiologydamagenatural enemy
Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 381 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © icipe 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Askarianzadeh, A. and Manzari, S. (2006) Neomaskellia andropogonis (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), a new genus and species record for Iran. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran 26, En13–En14.Google Scholar
Butani, D. K. (1965) Bionomics and control of sugarcane whitefly. Journal of Science and Technology 3, 159–167.Google Scholar
Byrne, D. N., Bellows, T. S. and Parrella, M. P. (1990) Whitefly in agricultural systems. In Whiteflies: Their Bionomics, Pest Status and Management (edited by Gerling, D.). Intercept, Andover, Hant, UK.Google Scholar
Danialy, M. (1985) Investigation of usage biological control, cultural and chemical methods against sugarcane borer in Hafttapeh/Khuzestan/Iran. MSc Thesis, Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran, 114 pp.Google Scholar
David, H. and Banerji, D. K. (1981) Some observations on the whitefly, Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett infesting sugarcane. Pestology 5, 7–8.Google Scholar
Green, S. B., Salkind, N. J. and Akey, T. M. (2000) Using SPSS for Windows: Analyzing and Understanding Data, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, USA.Google Scholar
ICUMSA (International Commission for Uniform Methods of Sugar Analysis) (1998) Method GS5/7-1, Cane Pol (Polarization), Brix, Fiber in Cane and Bagasse by the Wet Disintegrator Method. British Sugar Technical Centre, England.Google Scholar
Inayatullah, C. (1984) Sugar-cane aleurodids, Aleurolobus barodensis (Maskell) and Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett (Hom.: Aleyrodidae) and their natural enemies in Pakistan. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 5, 279–282. doi:10.1017/S1742758400001570.Google Scholar
Nayar, K. K., Ananthakrishnan, T. N. and David, B. V. (1976) General and Applied Entomology, 2nd edn. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, Delhi. 1184 pp.Google Scholar
Sandhu, J. S. and Singh, S. (1963) Studies on the biology of sugarcane whitefly, Aleurolobus barodensis (Maskell). Indian Journal of Sugar Research 7, 83–88.Google Scholar
Shishehbor, P. and Brennan, P. A. (1996) Adult longevity, fecundity and population growth rates for Trialeurodes ricini Misra (Hom.: Aleyrodidae) at different constant temperatures. The Canadian Entomologist, 128, 859–863.Google Scholar
Vasantharaj, B. V. and Ananthakrishnan, T. N. (2006) General and Applied Entomology. 2nd edn. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, Delhi, India. 1184 pp.Google Scholar