Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:35:03.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioural and electrophysiological response of sorghum chafer Pachnoda interrupta (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to plant compounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2007

Yitbarek Wolde-Hawariat ,
Emiru Seyoum ,
Bekele Jembere ,
Merid Negash ,
Bill S. Hansson  and
Ylva Hillbur
Yitbarek Wolde-Hawariat*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Addis Ababa University, PO Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 44, 230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
Emiru Seyoum
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Addis Ababa University, PO Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Bekele Jembere
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Addis Ababa University, PO Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Merid Negash
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Addis Ababa University, PO Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Bill S. Hansson
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 44, 230 53 Alnarp, Sweden Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knoell-Strasse 8, 0774 Jena, Germany
Ylva Hillbur
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 44, 230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Behavioural and antennal responses of the sorghum chafer Pachnoda interrupta (Olivier) were tested to the synthetic compounds, such as eugenol, methyl salicylate, methyl anthranilate, isoamyl acetate and butyl butyrate. In the field, all odour-baited traps, except isoamyl acetate applied on cotton dispensers, were significantly more attractive than blank (unbaited) traps and all compounds, except isoamyl acetate, elicited dose-dependent responses in both male and female antennae. Dispenser type (cotton wick or rubber septum), trap location (inside or outside sorghum fields) and season (mating/July or feeding/September) affected the performance of the different compounds as lures. In July, methyl salicylate applied on cotton was the most attractive lure, whereas the most attractive treatments in September were eugenol and isoamyl acetate on rubber septa. Possibly due to odour and visual competition from the sorghum plants, traps placed outside the sorghum fields caught significantly more beetles than traps placed inside the fields. The trapping efficiency of a locally produced trap was found not to be competitive with that of the commercially available Japanese beetle trap. Overall, the results suggest that trapping with semiochemicals has a potential in sorghum chafer management, either for mass trapping and/or as part of an integrated pest management programme.

Keywords

sorghum chaferPachnoda interruptaColeopteraScarabaeidaetrap designtrap locationdispenser typeplant compounds
Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 53 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alm, S. R. and Dawson, C. G. (2003) Evaluation of two prototype traps and existing trap designs for captures of Japanese beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 453–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, S. R., Yeh, T., Dawson, C. G. and Klein, M. G. (1996) Evaluation of trapped beetle repellency, traps height, and string pheromone dispensers on Japanese beetle captures (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Environmental Entomology 25, 1274–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderbrant, O., Bengtsson, M., Löfqvist, J. and Baeckström, P. (1992) Field response of the pine sawfly Neodiprion sertifer to controlled release of diprionyl acetate, diprionyl propionate and trans-perillenal. Journal of Chemical Ecology 18, 1707–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Yakir, D., Bazar, A. and Chen, M. (1995) Attraction of Maladera matrida (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to eugenol and other lures. Journal of Chemical Ecology 88, 415–420.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, M., Jaastad, G., Knudsen, G., Kobro, S., Bäckman, A.-C., Pettersson, E. and Witzgall, P. (2006) Plant volatiles mediate attraction to host and non-host plant in apple fruit moth, Argyresthia conjugella. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 118, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blight, M. M. and Smart, L. E. (1999) Influence of visual cues and isothiocyanate lures on capture of the pollen beetle, Meligethes aeneus in field traps. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25, 1501–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. O. S. and Crowe, T. J. (1978) The Genus Pachnoda in Ethiopia. Identification, Pest Status and Control of the Species. Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 19 pp.Google Scholar
Crocker, R. L., Klein, M. G., Wie, X. and Nailon, W. T. (1999) Attraction of Phyllophaga congrua, Phyllophaga crassissima, Phyllophaga crinita, and Cyclocephala lurida (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) adults to selected volatile compounds. Southwestern Entomologist 24, 315–320.Google Scholar
Domek, J. M. and Johnson, D. T. (1988) Demonstration of semiochemically induced aggregation in the green June beetle, Cotinis nitida (L.) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Environmental Entomology 17, 147–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, J. M. I., McGovern, T. P. and Ladd, T. L. (1986) Trapping techniques and attractants for Cetoniinae and Rutelinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 79, 374–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, J. M. I., McGovern, T. P. and Ladd, T. L. (1990) Floral attractant for Cetoniinae and Rutelinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 83, 1298–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunshaw, J. P. (1992) Field studies on the biology and economic importance of Pachnoda interrupta (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Mali West Africa. Bulletin of Entomological Research 82, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harari, A. R., Ben-Yakir, D. and Rosen, D. (1994) Mechanism of aggregation behavior in Maladera matrida Argaman (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 20, 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, D. W. and Potter, D. A. (2004) Floral characteristics affect susceptibility of hybrid tea Rosa × hybrida to Japanese beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillbur, Y. (2001) Tracking the tiny: identification of sex pheromone of the pea midge as prerequisite for pheromone based monitoring. PhD Dissertation. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences..Google Scholar
Hillbur, Y., El-Sayed, A., Bengtsson, M., Löfqvist, J., Biddle, A., Plass, E. and Francke, W. (2000) Laboratory and field study of male midges, Contarinia pisi, to synthetic sex pheromone components. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26, 1941–1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiwot, L. (2000) Historical background on the pest status and control of sorghum chafer, Pachnoda interrupta (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Ethiopia, pp. 9–15. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Development of Monitoring and Control Strategy Against Sorghum Chafer, Pachnoda interrupta (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Ethiopia. 28 February – 2 March 2000. MOA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Imai, T., Tsuchiya, S., Maekawa, M., Fujimori, T. and Leal, W. S. (1997) Methyl anthranilate, a noble attractant for soybean beetle Anomala rufocuprea Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 32, 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffé, K., Sánchez, P., Cerda, H., Hernández, J. V., Jaffé, R., Urdaneta, N., Guerra, G., Martínez, R. and Miras, B. (2000) Chemical ecology of the palm weevil Rhynchophorus palmarum (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): attraction to host plants and to a male-produced aggregation pheromone. Journal of Chemical Ecology 19, 1703–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jago, N. D. (1995) Population monitoring and crop loss assessment in integrated pest management of panicle pests of sorghum and pearl millet, pp. 103–113. In Panicle Insect Pests of Sorghum and Pearl Millet (Edited by Youm, O.). ICRISAT, Niamey, Niger.Google Scholar
Kevan, P. G. and Baker, H. G. (1983) Insects as flower visitors and pollinators. Annual Review of Entomology 28, 407–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, M. G. and Edwards, D. C. (1989) Captures of Popillia lewisi (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) and other scarabs on Okinawa with Japanese beetle lures. Journal of Economic Entomology 82, 101–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, M. G., Lawrence, K. D. and Ladd, T. L. (1973) A modified trap of Japanese beetle. Journal of Economic Entomology 66, 275–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, T. L. (1986) Enhancement of lures for Japanese beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) by Eugenol and Japonilure. Journal of Economic Entomology 79, 405–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, T. L., Klein, M. G. and Tumlinson, J. H. (1981) Phenethyl propionate + eugenol + geraniol (3:7:3) and Japonilure: A highly effective joint lure for Japanese beetles. Journal of Economic Entomology 74, 665–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarque, A. L., Maestri, D. M., Zygadlo, J. A. and Grosso, N. R. (1998) Volatile constituents from flowers of Acacia caven (Mol.) Mol. var. caven, Acacia aroma Gill. ex Hook., Erythrina crista-galli L. and Calliandra tweedii Benth. Flavour and Fragrance Journal 13, 266–268.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, M. C., Stensmyr, M. C., Bice, S. B. and Hansson, B. S. (2003) Attractiveness of electrophysiologically active fruit and flower volatiles to Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 29, 1253–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, W. S., Mochizuki, F., Wakamura, S. and Yasuda, T. (1992) Electroantennographic detection of Anomala cuprea Hope (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) sex pheromone. Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 27, 289–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughrin, J. H., Potter, D. A. and Hamilton-Kemp, T. R. (1995) Volatile compounds induced by herbivory act as aggregation kairomones for the Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica Newman). Journal of Chemical Ecology 21, 1457–1467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macku, C. and Jennings, W. J. (1987) Production of volatiles by ripening bananas. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 35, 845–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGovern, T. P. and Ladd, T. L. (1984) Japanese beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) attractant: Tests – with eugenol substitute and phenethyl propionate. Journal of Economic Entomology 77, 370–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOA (2003) Pest status of sorghum chafer Pachnoda interrupta (Olivier) in Afar Region, pp. 36–39. In Proceedings of a Workshop on Recent Developments in Sorghum Chafer, Pachnoda interrupta (Olivier) Research 25–26 June 2003. Crop Protection and Regulatory Department (CPPTRD), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
MOA and EARO (1999) Control measures used by farmers and associated problems, pp. 19–23. In Proceedings of a Workshop on the Significance, Distribution and Control of Sorghum Chafer, Pachnoda interrupta (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Amhara and Afar regions 10–13 March, 1999. MOA and EARO, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Murai, T., Imai, T. and Maekawa, M. (2000) Methyl anthranilate as an attractant for two thrips species and the thrips species parasitoids Ceranisus menes. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26, 2557–2565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, D. A. and Held, D. W. (2002) Biology and management of the Japanese beetle. Annual Review of Entomology 47, 175–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, D. K., Lee, M. H., Kim, S. H. and Klein, M. G. (1991) Attraction of scarab beetle populations (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to Japanese beetle lures in the Republic of Korea. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 36, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruther, J. and Mayer, C. J. (2005) Response of garden chafer, Phyllopertha horticola, to plant volatiles: From screening to application. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 115, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruther, J. and Tolasch, T. (2004) Attraction of garden chafer, Phyllopertha horticola, to floral Japanese beetle lure. Journal of Applied Entomology 128, 158–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPSS (2001) SPSS for Windows. Version 13.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago.Google Scholar
Seneshaw, A. and Mulugeta, N. (2002) Study on the biology of sorghum chafer, Pachnoda interrupta (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) under laboratory condition. Pest Management Journal of Ethiopia 6, 31–36.Google Scholar
Tasin, M., Anfora, G., Ioriatti, C., Carlin, S., Decristofaro, A., Schmidt, S., Bengtsson, M., Versini, G. and Witzgall, P. (2005) Antennal and behavioral responses of grapevine moth Lobesia botrana females to volatiles from grapevine. Journal of Chemical Ecology 31, 77–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yitbarek, W. H. and Hiwot, L. (2000) Yield loss assessment of sorghum chafer, Pachnoda interrupta (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Ethiopia, pp. 40–43. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Development of Monitoring and Control Strategy Against Sorghum Chafer, Pachnoda interrupta (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Ethiopia 28 February–2 March, 2000. MOA, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Zar, J. H. (1984) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey. 718 pp.Google Scholar