Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:20:46.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Traditional Values of Caterpillars (Insecta: Lepidoptera) Among the Bisa People of Zambia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

K. J. Mbata
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Zambia, P. O. Box 32379, Zambia
E. N. Chidumayo
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Zambia, P. O. Box 32379, Zambia
Get access

Abstract

The traditional values of caterpillars to the Bisa people of northern Zambia were assessed through a questionnaire survey involving 104 households from 24 villages. Information validation was by Participatory Rural Appraisal, Focus Group Discussions, caterpillar collection and identification. Caterpillars of eight Saturniidae moth species are valued very highly by the Bisa. Six of these were collected and identified from the miombo woodlands of the study area. The harvesting of Gynanisa maja (Klug), Gonimbrasia belina (Westwood), Cirina forda (Westwood), Imbrasia epimethea (Drury), I. rubra (Bouvier) and Imbrasia sp.3 caterpillars by local people, provides an alternative source of dietary animal protein and is associated with several cultural and spiritual processes and beliefs which bind the people together as one tribe. Edible caterpillars are bartered and sold at markets, enabling the local people to gain access to goods and services that normally are out of their reach. An individual collector processed 11.5 kg of sun-dried edible caterpillars worth Zambian Kwacha (ZK) 172,600 (US$ 52) during the caterpillar-harvesting period in 1999, while a household averaging six members processed 69.1 kg caterpillars worth ZK 1,036,098 (US$ 309). The income generated from sales of edible caterpillars far outstripped that generated from the sale of agricultural produce. Estimates of household incomes for 1999, an edible-caterpillar bumper harvest year, and the Bisa traditional edible-caterpillar management system are discussed.

Résumé

Les valeurs traditionelles des chenilles ont été evaluées chez la tribu Bisa du nord de la Zambie. Pour cela, une enquëte sous forme de questionnaire a été conduite chez 104 families réparties dans 24 villages. Les résultats ont été validés de trios façons: (1) méthode d'“Evaluation Rurale Participative”; (2) méthode de “Discussions avec groupes cibles” et; (3)“échantillonnage et identification des chenilles”. Les résultats montrent que huit espèces de chenilles de la famille des Attacidae ont une très grande valeur chez les Bisa. Six de ces espèces ont été échantillonées et identifiées dans la forêt de type miombo de la localité étudiée. La récolte des chenilles des espèces, Gynanisa maja (Klug), Gonimbrasia belina (Westwood), China forda (Westwood), Imbrasia epimethea (Drury), Imbrasia rubra (Bouvier) et Imbrasia sp.3 constitue sans doute l'une des plus grandes sources de protéines animales du régime alimentaire des Bisa. En outré, cette récolte est associée à plusieurs croyances et pratiques culturelles et spirituelles des Bisa, qui les unissent et tant que membres d'une meme tribu. Sur le plan socio-économique, les chenilles comestibles font l'objet de trocs et sont vendues aux marchés, permettant ainsi à la population de subvenir à ses besoins qu'elle n'est pas à même de se procurer autrement. Au cours de la saison de récolte 1999, un récolteur a préparé 11,5 kg de chenilles comestibles séchées d'une valeur de 172.600 ZK (= 52 dollars américains), tandis qu'une famille des six members en moyenne a préparé 69,10 kg de chenilles pour une valeur de 1.036.098 ZK (= 309 dollars américains). Les revenues provenant de la vente des chenilles comestibles dépassent de loin ceux provenant de la vente des produits agricoles. On discute de l'estimation des revenues en 1999, année de récolte exceptionnelle des chenilles, ainsi que du système tradítíonnel de gestion des chenilles comestibles par les Bisa.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agrawal, A. (1995) Indigenous and scientific knowledge: Some critical comments. Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor 3, 36.Google Scholar
Berkes, F., Colding, J. and Folke, C. (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol. Appl. 10, 12511262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[CSO] Central Statistics Office (2001) National Census Results for the Year 2000. Central Statistics Office, Lusaka.Google Scholar
Cunningham, T. (1996) Saturniid subsidy: Cash and protein from edible caterpillars of Zambesian woodlands, pp. 107108. In TheMiombo in Transition: Woodlands and Welfare in Africa (Edited by Campbell, B.). Centre for International Forestry Research, Bagor, Indonesia.Google Scholar
De Foliart, G. (1989) The human use of insects as food and as animal feed. Entomol. Bull. Entomol. Soc. America 36, 2235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Foliart, G. (1990) Insects as food in indigenous populations. Ethno-biology: Implications and applications. Proceedings of the First International Congress ofEthno-biology, Belém 1, 145150.Google Scholar
De Foliart, G. (1991) Insect fatty acids: Similar to those of poultry and fish in their degree of unsaturation, but higher in the polyunsaturates. The Food Insects Newsletter 4, 14.Google Scholar
Ferreira, A. (1995) Saving the mopane worm—South Africa's wiggly protein snack in danger. The Food Insect Newsletter 8, 6.Google Scholar
Holden, S. T. (1991) Edible caterpillars—a potential agroforestry resource? The Food Insect Newsletter 4, 34.Google Scholar
Leleup, N. and Daems, H. (1969) Les chenilles alimentaires du Kwango. Causes de leur raréfaction et measures préconisées pour y remédier. J. Agric. Trop. Botan. Appl. 16, 121.Google Scholar
Lungu, P. K. (1999) Community Environmental Action Plan (CEAP) for senior chief Kopa's chiefdom. Ministry of Tourism, Environment and Natural Resources (MTENR). Lusaka. 26 pp.Google Scholar
Malaisse, F. (1997) Se nourrir en forêt claire africaine, approche écologique et nutritionelle. Centre Technique de Cooperation Agricole et Rurale, CTA, Wageningen/Les Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux, Gembloux. 384 pp.Google Scholar
Malaisse, F. and Parent, G. (1980) Les chenilles comestibles du Shaba méridonal (Zaire). Les Naturalistes Beiges 61, 224.Google Scholar
Morris, M. G., Collins, N. M., Vane-Wright, R. I. and Waage, J. (1991) The utilization and value of non-domesticated insects, pp. 319347. In The Conservation of Insects and Their Habitats (Edited by Collins, N. M. and Thomas, J. A.). Academic Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Huis, A. (1996) The traditional use of arthropods in sub-saharan Africa. Proceedings of the Section Experimental and Applied Entomology of the Netherlands Entomological Society 7, 320.Google Scholar
Vane-Wright, R. I. (1991) Why not eat insects? Guest editorial. Bull. Entomol. Res. 81, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar