Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:52:53.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tick infestation of livestock and tick control methods in Brazil: A situation report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

David E. Evans
David E. Evans
Affiliation:
Embrapa-CNPGL, Rodovia MG-133 KM42, 36.155 Coronel Pacheco, MG, Brazil
Get access

Abstract

Boophilus microplus is Brazil's outstanding livestock ectoparasitic pest (annual losses, US$ 1B), affecting, to varying extents, all its States, with a national herd of some 130 M cattle. The country's 8.5 M sq km and 23,000 km of land frontier with 10 tick infested countries complicate any concepts of national campaigns. Whereas Brazil is increasingly climatically suitable for B. microplus from south (three generations annually) to central (four) to north (potentially up to five), direct problems caused are incidentally decreased due to greater use of Bos indicus cattle at lower stocking rates; five tick population survival mechanisms are suggested. Voluntary, empirical chemical tick control remains the tradition, with little government involvement. Formamidine and synthetic pyrethroid acaricides dominate the market, due to former tick resistance to arsenicals, organochlorines and organophosphates, and market forces. Plunge dips, various sprayers, and “pour-on” formulations are used; first suspicions of tick resistance to synthetic pyrethroids have been reported. Various ecologically based “improved” tick control schemes produced promising results experimentally, but require a complementary vaccine against babesiosis/anaplasmosis before wide recommendation. Intensive use of synthetic pyrethroid acaricides has created tick-borne diseases and heightened demand for a live, frozen “vaccine”, in its pre-commercialization phase in Brazil. A strategic research and development approach has been adopted for widespread improvement to cattle ticks and tick-borne disease control in Brazil.

Résumé

Boophilus microplus est l'ectoparasite predominant nuisible aux bovines du Brésil (pertes, USS IB annuellement). Il affecte, à différents degrés, tous les Etats de la nation, qui ont un total de 130 M de bovins. Le Brésil a 8,5 M km2 et 23,000 km de terre frontière avec 10 pays infestés de B. microplus; ce qui complique les concepts des campagnes nationales. Du point de vue climatique, le Brésil devient de plus en plus approprié pour B. microplus, de la zone sud (3 générations annuellement) jusqu'à la zone central (4) et au nord (avec un potentiel de jusqu'à 5); 5 mechanisms pour preserver les populations du tique au Brésil sont suggéres. En pratique pourtant, les problèmes directs du tique sont diminués accidentelement vers cettes directions, qui accompagnent l'utilisation de plus en plus du Bos indicus et moins de bétail sur les patûrages. L'utilisation volontaire de contrôle empirique du tique qui employe les produits chimiques continue a être la tradition brasiliènne; la participation du gouvernement est minimale. Les acaricides faits de formamidines et de pyrethroides synthétiques sont prédominants, à cause de la résistance du tique aux produits d'arsénic, des organochloriques et des organophosphoriques, et aussi de la publicité. Les bains d'emmersion, divers pulverisateurs, et les formulations “pour-on” sont employés. Les premiers soupcons de la résistance du tique aux produits de pyrethroides synthétiques ont été preséntés. Divers plans pour améliorer le contrôle du tique, basés sur l'écologie, ont produit des résultats prométeurs; cependant un vaccin contre la babesiose/anaplasmose de bovins est nécéssaire avant d'être généralement recommander. L'utilisation intensive des produits de pyrethroides synthétiques a crée des maladies transmises par le tique et a augmenté la demande pour un vaccin vivant et congelé, qui au Brésil est dans la phase de précommercialisation. Une méthode stratégique de recherche et développement a été adopté pour améliorer largement le control du tique et les maladies transmises par lui au Brésil.

Keywords

Cattle ticktick controlBoophilus microplusBrazilacaricide groupsacaricide resistanceecological studiesBabesiaAnaplasma“vaccine”computer modelssystems analysisLe tique des bovinsle contrôle du tiqueBoophilusmicroplusBrésilles catégories chimiquesla resistance chimiqueles études ecologiquesBabesiaAnaplasma“vaccin”les modèles de computateurl'analyse des systèmes
Type
Field Situation Reports
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 13 , Special Issue 4: Status and Recent Advances in Tick Management in Africa , August 1992 , pp. 629 - 643
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alves Branco, F. de P. J., Pinheiro, A. da C. and Sapper, M. de F. M. (1989) Contrôle do Boophilus microplus com esquemas de banhos estratégicos em bovinos Hereford. Anais, II Curso de Parasitologia Animal (Edited by Macedo, J. B. R. R. de), pp. 109–124. Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Animal, EMBRAPA–CNPO, Bagé, RS, Brazil.Google Scholar
Arteche, C. C. P. (1990) Eritrovac (Uso Veterinário). Technical Pamphlet, Laboratório Hemopar. Indústria e Comércio (M.E.), S. do Livramento, RS, Brazil.Google Scholar
Bittencourt, A. J., Fonesca, A. H. and Faccini, J. L. H. (1990) Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1887): infestações artificials, biologia da fase não parasitária e prevalência em caprinos e equinos. Arq. Univ. Fed. Rural R. Jan, Rio de Janeiro, RF, Brazil. (In press).Google Scholar
Brum, J. G. W. (1979) Postura e eclosão de Boophilus microplus (Can. 1887) em diferentes localisações geográficas do Rio Grande do Sul. M.Sc. thesis, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.Google Scholar
Daemon, E. (1985) Biologia da fase não parasitária de Anocentor nitens (Neumann, 1897) (Acarina: Ixodidae). M.Sc. thesis, UFRRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.Google Scholar
Evans, D. E. (1978a) Points arising from present data on tick distribution in Latin America. Proceedings: Workshop on the Ecology and Control of Ectoparasites on Bovines in Latin America (Edited by Thompson, K. C.), PP. 29–37. Cali, Colombia, August, 1975. Series CE-13, CIAT, Cali, Colombia.Google Scholar
Evans, D. E. (1978b) Boophilus microplus ecological studies and a tick fauna synopsis related to the developing cattle industry in the Latin American and Carribean Region. Ph.D. thesis, CNAA, London, UK.Google Scholar
Evans, D. E. (1984) Cattle tick ecology and control project, IPVDF-SA, RS/ODA/British Council, Brazil, 1978–1983. A Final Report. ODA, London, UK.Google Scholar
Evans, D. E. (1985) Ecologia do Boophilus microplus destacando a contribuição da ecologia nos estudos e ao controle dos problemas de carrapatos no Brasil. Anais, III Seminário Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária (Edited by Beck, A. A. H.), Balneário Camboriú, SC, Brazil, October, 1982, 69–88. EMBRAPA-DDT, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.Google Scholar
Evans, D. E. (1989a) Epidemiologia do carrapato de bovinos, Boophilus microplus, no Brasil. Anais, II Curso de Parasitologia Animal (Edited by Macedo, J. B. R. R.), Bagé RS, Brazil, August, 1988, 72–88. Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Animal, EMBRAPA-CNPO, Bagé, RS, Brazil.Google Scholar
Evans, D. E. (1989b) Tick ecology and tick control in Brazil. Proceedings: UN FAO Expert Consultation, Eradication of Ticks with Special Reference to Latin America, Mexico City, Mexico, June 1987; FAO Anim. Prod. Hlth. Pap. 75, 277–287.Google Scholar
Evans, D. E. and Arteche, C. C. P. (Editors) (1984) Anais do Seminário: Perfil das Atividades Desenvolvidas Contra o Carrapato dos Bovinos (Boophilus microplus) no Brasil e nos Paises Limítrofesdo Cone Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, April 1983. British Council, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.Google Scholar
Evans, D. E. and Arteche, C. C. P. (Editors) (1986) Programme II Workshop: Ticks, Tickborne Diseases and Insect Pests of Cattle in the Southern Cone Countries of South America — Progress Since 1983, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, April 1986. EMBRAPA/IICA, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.Google Scholar
Falce, H. C. (1982) Ixodídeos dos equídeos, muares e asininos no Estado do Paraná, Brasil. (Acari; Ixodidae). Ph.D. thesis, UF Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlong, J. and Evans, D. E. (1991) Epidemiologia do carrapato, Boophilus microplus, no Brasil: necessidade de uma abordagem amplo para seu estudo realístico. Anais VII Seminário Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, September 1991. pp. 48–50.Google Scholar
Gomes, A., Honer, M. R., Schenk, M. A. M. and Curvo, J. B. E. (1989) Populations of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus), on pure bred Nellore, Ibagé and Nellore x European crossbreds in the Brazilian savanna. Trop. anim. Health Prod. 21, 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzales, J. C. (1975) O Controle do Carrapato dos Bovinos. Livraria Sulina Editora, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.Google Scholar
Gonzales, J. C., Farias, N. A., Chies, J. M., Santos, T. B. and Jonas, A. B. (1990) Ocorrência de Boophilus microplus livre de Babesia spp. em regiāo indene (Santa Vitória do Palmar, RS, Brasil). A Hora Veterinária, Brazil, 10, 11–14.Google Scholar
Gonzales, J. C., Silva, N. R. da, Franco, N. and Pereira, I. H. de O. (1975) A vida livre do Boophilus microplus (Can. 1887). Arq. Fac. Vet. UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 3, 21–28.Google Scholar
Grahame, O. H. and Hourrigan, J. L. (1977) Eradication programmes for the arthropod parasites of livestock. Review Article. J. Med. Entomol. 13, 629–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, K. L. S. and Wilkinson, P. R. (1964) A comparison of cattle tick control by “conventional” acaricidal treatment, planned dipping and pasture spelling. Aust. J. agric. Res. 15, 841–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, K. L. S. and Wilkinson, P. R. (1971) A modification to pasture spelling to reduce acaricide treatments for cattle tick control. Aust. vet. J. 47, 108–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrington, L. W. and Tripp, R. (1984) Recommendation domains: a framework for on-farm research. CIMMYT Economics Programme Working Paper 02/84. CIMMYT, Mexico.Google Scholar
Honer, M. R. (1989) Epidemiologia da Tristeza Parasitária Bovina. Anais, II Curso de Parasitologia Veterinária (Edited by Macedo, J. B. R. R.), pp. 129–148. Bagé, RS, Brazil, August 1988. Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Animal, EMBRAPA-CNPO, Bagé, RS, Brazil.Google Scholar
Honer, M. R. and Gomes, A. (1989) Desenvolvimento e sobrevivência de larvas do carrapato Boophilus microplus nos Cerrados: análises e simulaçoes. Anais; VI Conferência Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Edited by Echevarria, F. A. M. and Borba, M. F. S.), p. 70. Bagé, RS, Brazil, September 1989. Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Animal, EMBRAPA-CNPO, Bagé, RS/MSDAgVet, Brazil. (Abstract).Google Scholar
Hoogstraal, H. (1973) Acarina (Ticks). In Viruses and Invertebrates (Edited by Gibbs, A. J.), Chapter 5, pp. 91–103. North Holland Publishing Co., New York, USA.Google Scholar
Ivancovich, J. C. (1980) Bioecologia de la garrapata del ganado, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1888). Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INTA, Buenos Aires, Argentina, XII, 1–54.Google Scholar
Kessler, R. H. (1989) Avanços no controle da TPB. Anais; VI Conferência Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Edited by Echevarria, F. A. M. and Borba, M. F. S.), pp. 13–14. Bagé, RS, Brazil, September 1989. EMBRAPA-CNPO, Bagé, RS/MSDAgVet, Brazil. (Abstract).Google Scholar
Kessler, R. H., Sacco, A. M. S., Madruga, C. R. and Honer, M. R. (1989) Novos alternativas de contrôle de TPB; parasitos atenuados. Anais, II Curso de Parasitologia Animal (Edited by Macedo, J. B. R. R.), pp. 151–154. Bagé. RS, Brazil, August 1988. EMBRAPA-CNPO, Bagé, RS, Brazil.Google Scholar
Laranja, R. J. (1979) Poder infestante da larva de Boophilus microplus (Can. 1887) em difoerentes condiçoes e periodos de envel cimirento. M.Sc. thesis, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS. Brazil.Google Scholar
Laranja, R. J., Cereser, V. H., Correa, B. L. and Martins, J. R. de S. (1988) Carrapaticidas Usados e em uso no Rio Grande do Sul. Bol. IPVDF, Guaiba, RS, Brazil, pp. 57–69.Google Scholar
Laranja, R. J., Cereser, V. H., Martins, J. R. de S., Castagna, M., Ferreira, F. and Evans, D. E. (1986) Potêncial de reprodução do Boophilus microplus na Região de Campos de Cima da Serra, Vacaria, RS. Bol. IPVDF, Guaiba, RS, Brazil, pp. 9–17.Google Scholar
Laranja, R. J., Martins, J. R. de S., Correa, B. L. and Ferraz, C. (1989) Identificação de uma estirpe de Boophilus microplus resistente aos carrapaticidas piretroides no Estado de Rio Grande do Sul. Anais; VI Conferência Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Edited by Echevarria, F. A. M. and Borba, M. F. S.), p. 83. Bagé, RS, Brazil, September 1989. EMBRAPA-CNPO, Bagé, RS'MSDAgVet, Brazil. (Abstract).Google Scholar
Leite, R. C. (1988) Boophilus microplus (Can, 1887): Susceptibilidade, uso atual e retrospetivos de carrapaticidas em propriedades das regiões fisogeográficas da Baixada de Grande Rio e Rio de Janeiro; uma abordagem epidemiológica. Ph.D. thesis, UFRRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.Google Scholar
Magalães, F. E. P. (1989) Aspectos biológicos e ecológicos e de controle de Boophilus microplus (Can, 1887) no Município de Pedro Leopoldo, MG, Brasil. Ph.D. thesis, UFBH, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.Google Scholar
Maywald, G. F., Dallwitz, M. J. and Sutherst, R. W. (1980) A systems approach to cattle tick control. Proceedings, 4th Biennial Conference, Simulation Society of Australia, Brisbane, Qld, Australia, August, 1980. pp. 132–139.Google Scholar
McCulloch, R. N. and Lewis, I. J. (1968) Ecological studies of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus, in the north coast district of New South Wales. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19, 689–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministério da Agriculture, Brasil (1984) Carrapato, berne e bicheira no Brasil, 1983. Secretaria de Defesa Sanitária Animal (Miscellaneous Publication), Brasília, DF, Brazil.Google Scholar
Ministério da Agricultura, Brasil (1985) Prováveis prejuizos causados pelos carrapatos, Brasil, 1983. Boletin da Secretaria de Defesa Sanitária Animal (No. Especial), Brasília, DF, Brazil.Google Scholar
Norris, K. R. (1957) Strategic dipping for the control of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) in S. Queensland. Aust. J. agric. Res. 8, 768–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, G. A. (1989) Systems analysis and decision tools for ticks and tick-borne disease control — philosophy, concepts and techniques. Introductory lecture. In Report on a Series of Workshops on Tick and Tick-borne Disease Control held in Brazil, 1–22 December 1988 (Edited by Norton, G. A. and Evans, D. E.), pp. 6–14. Embrapa, Coronel Pacheco, MG, Brazil/SCPM, Ascot, Berks, UK.Google Scholar
Norton, G. A. and Evans, D. E. (1989) (Editors) Report on a Series of Workshops on Tick and Tick-borne Disease Control held in Brazil, 1–22 December 1988. Embrapa, Coronel Pacheco, MG, Brazil/SCPM, Ascot, Berks, UK.Google Scholar
Norton, G. A. and Heong, K. L. (1988) An approach to improving pest management: rice in Malaysia. Crop. Prot. 7, 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, G. A. and Walker, B. H. (1985) A decision analysis approach to savanna management. J. environ. manage. 21, 15–31.Google Scholar
Norton, G. A., Sutherst, R. W. and Maywald, G. F. (1983) A framework for integrating control methods against the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus, in Australia. J. appl. Ecol. 20, 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira de Oliveira, G., Costa, R. de P., Mello, R. P. and Menguelli, C. (1974) Estudo ecológico de fase não-parasitário do Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1887), (Acarina: Ixodidae) no Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Arq. Univ. Fed. Rural R. Jan., Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 4, 1–10.Google Scholar
Radley, D. E., Martins, J. R. and Cheong, F. H. (1991) Sistemas de contrôle de carapatos e da “Tristeza Parasitária Bovina”. Special Publication; IPVDF/ODA UK, El Dorado do Sul, RS, Brazil.Google Scholar
Snowball, G. H. (1957) Ecological observations on the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). Aust. J. agric. Res. 8, 394–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, A. P. de, Gonzales, J. C., Ramos, C. R., Paloschi, C. G. and Morães, A. N. de (1988) Fase de vida livre do Boophilus microplus no Planalto Catarinense. Pesq. agropec. bras., Brasília, DF, Brazil, 23, 427–434.Google Scholar
Souza, A. P., Paloschi, C. G., Bellato, V., Sartor, A. A., Ramos, C. I. and Dalagnol, C. (1989) Poder infestante das larvas de Boophilus microplus (Can., 1887) em condicões naturais dos campos de Lages, SC. Anais; VI Conferência Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária (Edited by Eschevarria, F. A. M. and Borba, M. F. S.), p. 71. Bagé, RS, Brazil, September 1989. EMBRAPA-CNPO, Bagé, RS/MSDAgVet, Brazil. (Abstract).Google Scholar
Sutherst, R. W. (1987) (Editor) Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases: Proceedings of an International Workshop on the Ecology of Ticks and Epidemiology of Tick-borne Diseases, Nyanga, Zimbabwe, 17–21 February, 1986. AGIAR Proceedings No. 17.Google Scholar
Sutherst, R. W. and Dallwitz, M. J. (1978) Progress in the development of a population model for the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. Proc. 4th Int. Congr. Acarol. Saalfelden, Austria, August 1974. pp. 557–563.Google Scholar
Sutherst, R. W. and Maywald, G. F. (1985) A computerised system for matching climates in ecology. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 13, 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherst, R. W., Norton, G. A., Barlow, N. D., Conway, G. R., Birley, M. and Comins, H. N. (1979) An analysis of management strategies for cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) control in Australia. J. appl. Ecol. 16, 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherst, R. W., Wharton, R. H. and Utech, K. B. W. (1978) Guide to studies on tick ecology. CSIRO Division of Entomology Technical Paper No. 14.Google Scholar
Utech, K. B. W., Sutherst, R. W., Dallwitz, M. J., Wharton, R. H., Maywald, G. F. and Sutherland, I. D. (1983) A model of the survival of larvae of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus, on pasture. Aust. J. agric. Res. 34, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, R. H., Harley, K. L. S., Wilkinson, P. R., Utech, K. B. W. and Kelly, B. M. (1969) A comparison of cattle tick control by pasture spelling, planned dipping and tick resistant cattle. Aust. J. agric. Res. 20, 783–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, P. R. (1957) The spelling of pastures in tick control. Aust. J. agric. Res. 8, 414–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, P. R. (1970) Factors affecting the distribution and abundance of the cattle tick in Australia: observations and hypotheses. Acarologia 12, 492–508.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, P. R. and Wilson, J. T. (1959) Survival of cattle ticks in central Queensland pastures. Aust. J. agric. Res. 10, 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar