Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:18:54.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Symposium: Trophodynamics and life histories of larger marine protozoa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

O. Roger Anderson  and
Rudolf Röttger
O. Roger Anderson
Affiliation:
Biological Oceanography, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, U.S.A.
Rudolf Röttger
Affiliation:
Institut für Allgemeine Mikrobiologie, Der Universität, Kiel, F.R.G.
Get access

Extract

The unique habitats of marine environments including some organically rich, but physically variable, benthic environments, and the rather uniform, regionally stable, open ocean environments have both produced species of biomineralizing protozoa of remarkable size ranging from several hundreds of microns to several millimetres (for solitary forms of foraminifera and radiolaria for example). Some colonial radiolaria are several centimetres in diameter and may reach lengths of over a metre for filiform species. These larger, free-living protozoa aften harbour algal symbionts and exhibit unusual adaptations to enhance their survival in their unique habitat and to stabilize, if not enhance, their association with their algal symbionts through structural and physiological modifications to complement the unique requirements imposed by animal–algal associations.

Keywords

Trophodynamicslife historiesmarine protozoadiatom symbiontssize in foraminifera
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 7 , Special Issue 3: Progress in Entomology: Proceedings of the VII International Congress of Protozoology , June 1986 , pp. 417 - 420
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hallock, P. (1985) Why ate larger foraminifera large? Paleo-biology 11, 195–208.Google Scholar
Le Calvez, J. (1938) Recherches sur les foraminiferes. 1. Development et reproduction. Arch. Zool. exp. gen. 80, 163–333.Google Scholar
Lee, J. J. (1980) Nutrition and physiology of the foraminifera. In Biochemistry and Physiology of Protozoa (Edited by Levandowsky, M. and Hutner, S. H.), 2nd edn, Vol. 3, pp. 43–66Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lee, J. J. (1983) Perspective on algal endosymbionts in larger foraminifera. Int. Rev. Cyt. suppl. 11, 49–77.Google Scholar
Lee, J. J. and McEnery, M. (1983) Symbiosis in foraminifera. In Algal Symbiosis (Edited by Goff, L. J.), pp. 37–68. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leutenegger, S. (1984) Symbiosis in benthic foraminifera: specificity and host adaptations. J. Foraminif. Res. 14, 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhumbler, L. (1909) Die Foraminiferen (Thalamophoren) der Plankton-Expedition, 1. Teil. In Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition der Hwnboldl-Stiftung (Edited by Hensen, V.), pp. 1–331. Keil, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Taylor, F. J. R. (1983) Some eco-evolutionary aspects of intracellular symbiosis. Int. Rev. Cyt. suppl. 14, 1–28.Google Scholar
Trench, R. K. (1979) The cell biology of plant-animal symbiosis. A. Rev. Pl. Physiol. 30, 485–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar