Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:12:09.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resistance of three-way cross experimental maize hybrids to post-harvest insect pests, the larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus) and maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2011

Tadele Tefera ,
Stephen Mugo ,
Paddy Likhayo  and
Yoseph Beyene
Tadele Tefera*
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), ICRAF House, UN Avenue, Gigiri, PO Box 1041-00621 Village Market, Nairobi, Kenya
Stephen Mugo
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), ICRAF House, UN Avenue, Gigiri, PO Box 1041-00621 Village Market, Nairobi, Kenya
Paddy Likhayo
Affiliation:
Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI), National Agricultural Research Laboratories, PO Box 14733-00800, Nairobi, Kenya
Yoseph Beyene
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), ICRAF House, UN Avenue, Gigiri, PO Box 1041-00621 Village Market, Nairobi, Kenya
*
*E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The larger grain borer Prostephanus truncatus Horn and the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky are important pests of stored maize in the tropics, particularly where maize is stored on-farm with little control of moisture content and without use of pesticides. This study was undertaken to determine level of resistance among new experimental maize hybrids against P. truncatus and S. zeamais. Out of the 54 experimental hybrids tested, eight hybrids were resistant, six were susceptible and the remaining 40 hybrids were moderately resistant. Five hybrids showed considerable reduction in losses for both P. truncatus and S. zeamais (CKPH08013, CKPH08021, CKPH08003, CKPH08004 and CKPH08009), suggesting that they contained genes that confer resistance to the two pests. Low grain weight loss, powder production and low insect multiplication on resistant grains reduce the negative impact of the two beetle pests. Therefore, host plant resistance can be used as a vital component of an integrated pest management strategy against P. truncatus and S. zeamais.

Keywords

host resistancemaizeProstephanus truncatusSitophilus zeamaispost-harvest loss
Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 31 , Issue 1-2 , June 2011 , pp. 3 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, T. (1991) The biology, significance and control of the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motsch., (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on stored maize. MSc Thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Altieri, M. A. and Nicholls, C. I. (2003) Soil fertility management and insect pests: harmonizing soil and plant health in agroecosystems. Soil and Tillage Research 72, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnason, J. T., Gale, J., Conilh de Beyssac, B., Sen, A., Miller, S. S., Philogene, B. J. R., Lambert, J. D. H., Fulcher, R. G., Serratos, A. and Mihm, J. (1993) Role of phenolics in resistance of maize grain to the stored grain insects, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) and Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. Journal of Stored Products Research 28, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnason, J. T., Baum, B., Gale, J., Lambert, J. D. H., Bergvinson, D., Philogene, B. J. R., Serratos, J. A., Mihm, J. and Jewell, D. C. (1994) Variation in resistance of Mexican landraces of maize to maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais, in relation to taxanomic and biochemical parameters. Euphytica 74, 227–236.Google Scholar
Bamaiyi, L. J., Dike, M. C. and Onu, I. (2007) Relative susceptibility of some sorghum varieties to the rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Entomology 4, 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergvinson, D. J. (2001) Storage pest resistance in maize, pp. 32–39. Maize Research Highlights 1999–2000. CIMMYT Technical Bulletin 6815 (edited by Pandey, S.), CIMMYT, Mexico DF.Google Scholar
Bergvinson, D. J., Vasal, S. K., Singh, N. N., Panwar, V. P. S. and Sekhar, J. C. (2004) Advances in conventional breeding for insect resistance in tropical maize, pp. 325–338. In New Technologies for the New Millennium. Proceedings of the 8th Asian Regional Maize Workshop, Bangkok, Thailand, 5–8 August 2002 (edited by Srinivasan, G., Zaidi, P. H., Prasanna, B. M., Gonzalez, F. and Lesnick, K.). International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico DF.Google Scholar
Boxall, R. A. (2002) Damage and loss caused by the larger grain borer Prostephanus truncatus. Integrated Pest Management Review 7, 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demissie, G., Tefera, T. and Tadesse, A. (2008) Importance of husk covering on field infestation of maize by Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) at Bako, Western Ethiopia. African Journal of Biotechnology 7, 3774–3779.Google Scholar
Derera, J., Giga, P. D. and Pixley, K. (1999) Resistance of maize to the maize weevil: II. Non-preference. African Crop Science Journal 9, 441–450.Google Scholar
Derera, J., Giga, D. P. and Pixley, K. V. (2001) Resistance of maize to the maize weevil: II. Non-preference. African Crop Science Journal 9, 441–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhliwayo, T. and Pixley, K. V. (2003) Divergent selection for resistance to maize weevil in six maize populations. Crop Science 43, 2043–2049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobie, P. (1974) The susceptibility of different types of maize to postharvest infestation by Sitophilus zeamais and Sitotroga cerealella and the importance of this factor at the small-scale farm level, pp. 98–113. In Proceedings of the 1st International Working Conference on Stored-Product Entomology. 7–11 October 1974, Savannah, Georgia, USA. (edited by Brady, E. U., Brower, J. H., Hunter, P. E., Jay, E. G., Lum, P. T. M., Lund, H. O., Mullen, M. A. and Davis, R.). IWCSPP, USA.Google Scholar
Garcia-Lara, S. G., Bergvinson, D. J., Burt, A. J., Ramputh, A. I., Pontones, D. M. D. and Arnason, J. T. (2004) The role of pericarp cell wall components in maize weevil resistance. Crop Science 44, 1546–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giga, D. P. and Mazarura, U. W. (1991) Levels of resistance to the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais in exotic, local open pollinated and hybrid maize germplasm. Insect Science and Its Application 12, 159–169.Google Scholar
Golob, P. (2002) Chemical, physical and cultural control of Prostephanus truncatus. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 7, 245–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueye, M. T., Goergen, G., Badiane, D., Hell, K. and Lamboni, L. (2008) First report on occurrence of the larger grain borer Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) in Senegal. African Entomology 16, 309–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M. G., Borgemeister, C. and Nansen, C. (2004) Ecological studies on the larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Col.: Bostrichidae) and their implications for integrated pest management. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 7, 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kankolongo, M. A., Hell, K. and Nawa, I. N. (2009) Assessment for fungal, mycotoxin and insect spoilage in maize stored for human consumption in Zambia. Journal of Food Science and Agriculture 89, 1366–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. K., Brewbaker, J. L. and Hallauer, A. R. (1988) Insect and disease resistance from tropical maize for use in temperate zone hybrids, pp. 194–226. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Corn and Sorghum Conferences, Chicago, IL. 8–9 December 1988. American Seed Trade Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kumar, H. (2002) Resistance in maize to the larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 38, 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L. (1988) Behavioral ecology and life history evolution in the larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn). PhD thesis, University of Reading, UK. 229 pp.Google Scholar
Markham, R. H., Wright, V. F. and Rios Ibarra, R. M. (1991) A selective review of research on Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Col.: Bostrichidae) with an annotated and updated bibliography. CEIBA 32, 90 pp.Google Scholar
Mugo, S., Mulaa, M., Likhayo, P. and Gichuki, S. (2008) Insect Resistant Maize for Africa (IRMA) Project. IRMA Project Document no. 30. CIMMYT, Nairobi.Google Scholar
Mutiro, C. F., Giga, D. P. and Chetsanga, P. (1992) Postharvest damage in small farmers' stores. Zimbabwe Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 49–59.Google Scholar
Mwololo, J. K., Mugo, S., Okori, P., Tefera, T. and Munyiri, S. W. (2010) Genetic diversity for resistance to larger grain borer in maize hybrids and open pollinated varieties in Kenya, pp. 535–539. In Second RUFORUM Biennial Meeting. 20–24 September 2010. Entebbe, Uganda.Google Scholar
Pantenius, C. U. (1988) Storage losses in traditional maize granaries in Togo. Insect Science and Its Application 9, 725–735.Google Scholar
Schneider, H., Borgemeister, C., Sétamou, M., Affognon, H., Bell, A., Zweigert, M. E., Poehling, H.-M. and Schulthess, F. (2004) Impact assessment of Teretrius nigrescens Lewis (Coleoptera: Histeridae), an introduced predator of the larger grain borer Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) in Togo and Benin. Biological Control 30, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serratos, A., Arnason, J. T., Nozzolillo, C., Lambert, J. D. H., Philogene, B. J. R., Fulcher, G., Davidson, K., Peacock, L., Atkinson, J. and Morand, P. (1987) Factors contributing to resistance of exotic maize populations to the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais. Journal of Chemical Ecology 13, 751–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sing, D. N. and McCain, F. S. (1963) Relationship of some nutritional properties of corn kernel to weevil infestation. Crop Science 3, 259–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tipping, P. W., Rodriguez, J. G., Poneleit, C. G. and Legg, D. E. (1988) Resistance of dent corn inbreds to oviposition by the maize weevil. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 61, 131–134.Google Scholar
Withers, T. M. (1997) Changes in plant attack over time in no-choice tests: an indicator of specificity. Proceedings of the 50th New Zealand Plant Protection Society Conference 50, 214–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar