Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:27:31.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pure research and science policy in tropical developing countries*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Thomas R. Odhiambo
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Extract

The conventional theology regarding the role of science in the social and economic development of the Third World is that its crucial function must be the transfer of technology from the science-based industrialized countries to the developing regions of the world. Indeed, ever since 1963, when the world took part in the “United Nations Conference for the Application of Science and Technology to Development” in Geneva, Switzerland, national planners in the Third World and economic planners attached to the donor community, have been consumed by the concept of transfer of technology as a short-cut to science-driven socio-economic development in the Third World. The 1979 United Nations Conference on Science and Technology for Development, on the same theme held in Vienna, Austria, reinforced this concept, and rather confirmed the policy of focussing human and financial resources on the technology facets of science rather than on the fundamental research aspects.

Type
Plenary Lectures I–III
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Broad, W. and Wade, N. (1985) Betrayers of Truth. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brumby, P. J. and Trail, J. C. M. (1986) Animal breeding and productivity studies in Africa. ILCA Bull. 23, 2327.Google Scholar
Carrel, A. (1935) Man the Unknown. Harper and Brothers, London.Google Scholar
Carter, T. R., Konijn, N. T. and Watts, R. G. (1984) The role of agroclimatic models in climate impact analysis. Working Paper (WP-84–98), 26 pp. IASSA, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. (1985) Science and Technology in World Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford and UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
Fordham, H. R. (1983) Intercropping—What are the advantages? Outlook on Agric. 12(3), 142146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forel, A. (1908) The Senses of Insects. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Hart, M. H. (1978) The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History. A & W Publishers, Inc. New York.Google Scholar
Meister, U. (1986) Africa's lost illusions. Swiss Review of World Affairs, August 1986, pp. 811.Google Scholar
Monod, J. (1970) On values in the Age of Science. In: The Place of Value in a World of Facts (Edited by Tiselius, A. and Nilsson, S.) pp. 1927. Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Tiselius, A. and Nilsson, S. (1970) Opening address. In: The Place of Value in a World of Facts, pp. 1115. Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar