Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T10:35:11.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preference of flight morph of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) for three plant legumes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2018

Olufunmilayo E. Ajayi*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Storage Technology Programme, Federal University of Technology, P.M. B. 704, Akure 340001, Nigeria Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, 301 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL 36849-5413, USA
Tolulope O. Morawo
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, 301 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL 36849-5413, USA
Henry Y. Fadamiro
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, 301 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL 36849-5413, USA
*
Get access

Abstract

We studied host discrimination in flight morph of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) among the legume plants Ife-brown (IB) and black-eyed (BE) cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L. Walp), soybean (SB), and Glycine max (L.) and analysed legume volatiles towards developing an attractant for C. maculatus. Olfactometry studies were conducted to investigate attraction of mated 3–4-day-old female C. maculatus to legume plants with the green pod (PGP), green pods (GP), plant with the ripened pod (PRP), ripened pod (RP), and plant without pod (PWP). We also assessed the response of beetles to phenological stages of the most attractive legume. In Y-tube bioassays, C. maculatus showed greater attraction to individual legumes at three phenological stages: PGP (73–93%), PRP (80–100%), and RP (63–93%) compared with PWP (6–36%). In four-choice bioassays, C. maculatus preferred IB at all stages to other legumes. SB had an insignificant attraction on the beetle. The RP of IB was the most attractive part of the plant. Gas chromatography (GC) and GC–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analyses of volatiles emitted by RP of the legumes revealed a variation in the compositions of odour blends. Benzaldehyde was found in the volatiles of IB and BE with a higher emission in IB. Octanone was detected only in IB. The two compounds were undetected in SB volatiles. These results reveal that in addition to infesting cowpea plants at RP stage as reported in previous studies, C. maculatus could also infest cowpea plants at the GP stage.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © icipe 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abate, T., Alene, A. D., Bergvinson, D., Shiferaw, B., Silim, S., Orr, A. and Asfaw, S. (2012) Tropical Grain Legumes in Africa and South Asia: Knowledge and Opportunities. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Nairobi, Kenya. 112 pp. ISBN: 978-92-9066-544-1.Google Scholar
Adedire, C. O. and Ajayi, O. E. (2003) Potential of sandbox, Hura crepitans (L.) seed oil for protection of cowpea seeds from Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) infestation. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 110, 602610.Google Scholar
Ajayi, O. E., Balusu, R., Morawo, T. O., Zebelo, S. and Fadamiro, H. (2015) Semiochemical modulation of host preference of Callosobruchus maculatus on legume seeds. Journal of Stored Products Research 63, 3137.Google Scholar
Ashford, R. D. (1994) Ashford's Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals. Wavelength Publications Ltd, London, England. 389 pp.Google Scholar
Awmack, C. S. and Leather, S. R. (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 47, 817844.Google Scholar
Balusu, R. R. and Fadamiro, H. Y. (2011) Host finding and acceptance preference of the yellowmargined leaf beetle, Microtheca ochroloma (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), on cruciferous crops. Environmental Entomology 40, 14711477.Google Scholar
Beck, J. J., Light, D. M. and Gee, W. S. (2012) Electroantennographic bioassay as a screening tool for host plant volatiles. Journal of Visualized Experiments 63, 3931. doi: 10.3791/3931.Google Scholar
Bernays, E. A. and Chapman, R. F. (1994) Host-plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. Chapman and Hall, New York. 312 pp.Google Scholar
Birkett, M. A., Chamberlain, K., Guerrieri, E., Pickett, J. A., Wadhams, L. J. and Yasuda, T. (2003) Volatiles from whitefly-infested plants elicit a host-locating response in the parasitoid, Encarsia formosa. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29, 15891600.Google Scholar
Biswas, G. C. (2013) Insect pests of soybean (Glycine max L.), their nature of damage and succession with the crop stages. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Science 39, 18.Google Scholar
Booker, R. H. (1967) Observations on three bruchids associated with cowpea in Northern Nigeria. Journal of Stored Products Research 3, 115.Google Scholar
Bruce, T. J. A., Wadhams, L. J. and Woodcock, C. M. (2005) Insect host location: A volatile situation. Trends in Plant Science 10, 269274.Google Scholar
Burkholder, W. E. (1990) Practical use of pheromones and other attractants for stored-product insects, pp. 497516. In Behavior-Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants (edited by Ridgeway, R. L., Silverstein, R. M. and Inscoe, M. N.). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Cardè, R. T. and Minks, A. K. (1995) Control of moth pests by mating disruption: Successes and constraints. Annual Review of Entomology 40, 559585.Google Scholar
Caswell, G. H. (1984) The value of the pod in protecting cowpea seed from attack by bruchid beetles. Samaru Journal of Agricultural Research 2, 4955.Google Scholar
Crook, D. J., Khrimian, A., Francese, J. A., Fraser, I., Poland, T. M., Sawyer, A. J. and Mastro, V. C. (2008) Development of a host-based semiochemical lure for trapping emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Environmental Entomology 37, 356365.Google Scholar
D'Alessandro, M., Brunner, V., von Mérey, G. and Turlings, T. C. J. (2009) Strong attraction of the parasitoid Cotesia marginiventris towards minor volatile compounds of maize. Journal of Chemical Ecology 35, 999. doi: 10.1007/s10886-009-9692-7.Google Scholar
Devereau, A. D., Credland, P. F., Appleby, J. and Jackai, L. (1999) Rapid screening of grain for insect resistance, pp. 1826. In Proceedings of the 7th International Working Conference on Stored-Product Protection (edited by Jin, Z., Liang, Q., Liang, Y., Tan, X. and Guan, L.). Sichuan Publishing House of Science and Technology, Chengdu, P.R. China.Google Scholar
De Moraes, C. M., Lewis, W. J., Paré, P. W., Alborn, H. T. and Tumlinson, J. H. (1998) Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasitoids. Nature 393, 570573.Google Scholar
Dötterl, S., Wolfe, L. M. and Jürgens, A. (2005) Qualitative and quantitative analyses of flower scent in Silene latifolia. Phytochemistry 66, 203213.Google Scholar
Duke, J. A. (1990) Introduction to food legumes, pp. 142. In Insect Pests of Tropical Food Legumes (edited by Singh, S. R.). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
El-Sayed, A. M., Suckling, D. M., Byers, J. A., Jang, E. B. and Wearing, C. H. (2009) Potential of “lure and kill” in long-term pest management and eradication of invasive species. Journal of Economic Entomology 102, 815835.Google Scholar
Farré-Armengol, G., Filella, I., Llusia, J. and Peñuelas, J. (2013) Floral volatile organic compounds: Between attraction and deterrence of visitors under global change. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 15, 5667.Google Scholar
Foster, S. P. and Harris, M. O. (1997) Behavioral manipulation methods for insect pest-management. Annual Review of Entomology 42, 123146.Google Scholar
George, J. and Verma, K. K. (1999) Laboratory rearing of the ‘active’ phase of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 37, 584588.Google Scholar
Hammack, L. (2001) Single and blended maize volatiles as attractants for diabroticite corn rootworm beetles. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27, 13731390.Google Scholar
Huber, F. K., Kaiser, R., Sauter, W. and Schiest, F. P. (2005) Floral scent emission and pollinator attraction in two species of Gymnadenia (Orchidaceae). Oecologia 142, 564575. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1750-9.Google Scholar
IITA [International Institute of Tropical Agriculture] (1989) IITA Annual Report: 1988/89. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
James, D. G. (2005) Further field evaluation of synthetic herbivore-induced plant volatiles as attractants for beneficial insects. Journal of Chemical Ecology 31, 481495. doi: 10.1007/s10886-005-2020-y.Google Scholar
Jarriault, D., Gadenne, C., Rospars, J.-P. and Anton, S. (2009) Quantitative analysis of sex-pheromone coding in the antennal lobe of the moth Agrotis ipsilon: A tool to study network plasticity. The Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 11911201.Google Scholar
Köllner, T.G., Schnee, C., Gershenzon, J. and Degenhardt, J. (2004) The variability of sesquiterpenes emitted from two Zea mays cultivars is controlled by allelic variation of two terpene synthase genes encoding stereoselective multiple product enzymes. The Plant Cell 16, 11151131.Google Scholar
Koul, O., Walia, S. and Dhaliwal, G. S. (2008) Essential oils as green pesticides: Potential and constraints. Pesticide International 4, 6384.Google Scholar
Kreuzwieser, J., Scheerer, U., Kruse, J., Burzlaff, T., Honsel, A., Alfarraj, S., Georgiev, P., Schnitzler, J.-P., Ghirardo, A., Kreuzer, I., Hedrich, R. and Rennenberg, H. (2014) The Venus flytrap attracts insects by the release of volatile organic compounds. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 755766. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert455.Google Scholar
Kumar, U., Sharma, P. K. and Srivastava, S. (2012) Spectrum of insect pest complex of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) at Lambapeelpal village in Kota Region, India. ISCA Journal of Biological Sciences 1, 8082.Google Scholar
Lale, N. E. S. (2002) Stored Products Entomology and Acarology. Mole Publications (NiSi) Ltd., Maiduguri, Nigeria. 236 pp.Google Scholar
Li, P., Zhu, J. and Qin, Y. (2012) Enhanced attraction of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) to pheromone-baited traps with the addition of green leaf volatiles. Journal of Economic Entomology 105, 11491156.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Ma, H., Wan, Y., Li, T., Liu, X., Sun, Z. and Li, Z. (2016) Volatile organic compounds emissions from Luculia pinceana flower and its changes at different stages of flower development. Molecules 21, 531. doi: 10.3390/molecules21040531.Google Scholar
Mbata, G. N. (1993) Evaluation of susceptibility of varieties of cowpea to Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) and Callosobruchus subinnotatus (Pic.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 29, 207213.Google Scholar
McCormic, A. C., Unsicker, S. B. and Gershenzon, J. (2012) The specificity of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in attracting herbivore enemies. Trends in Plant Science 17, 303310.Google Scholar
Messina, F. J. and Renwick, J. A. A. (1985) Dispersal polymorphism of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): Variation among populations in response to crowding. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 78, 201206.Google Scholar
Morawo, T. and Fadamiro, H. (2014) Attraction of two larval parasitoids with varying degree of host specificity to single components and a binary mixture of host-related plant volatiles. Chemoecology 24, 127135. doi: 10.1007/s00049-014-0154-5.Google Scholar
Mullen, M. A. (1992) Development of a pheromone trap for monitoring Tribolium castaneum. Journal of Stored Products Research 28, 245249.Google Scholar
Najar-Rodriguez, A. J., Galizia, C. G., Stierle, J. and Dorn, S. (2010) Behavioral and neurophysiological responses of an insect to changing ratios of constituents in host plant-derived volatile mixtures. Journal of Experimental Biology 213, 33883397. doi: 10.1242/jeb.046284.Google Scholar
Ngowi, A. V. F., Mbise, T. J., Ijani, A. S. M., London, L. and Ajayi, O. C. (2007) Smallholder vegetable farmers in Northern Tanzania: Pesticides use practices, perceptions, cost and health effects. Crop Protection 26, 16171624.Google Scholar
Nishida, R. (2014) Chemical ecology of insect–plant interactions: Ecological significance of plant secondary metabolites. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 78, 113. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2014.877836.Google Scholar
Obadofin, A. A. (2014) Screening of some cowpea varieties for resistance to Callosobruchus maculatus. International Journal of Pure and Applied Science Technologies 22, 917.Google Scholar
Phillips, T. W. (1997) Semiochemicals of stored-product insects: Research and applications. Journal of Stored Products Research 33, 1730.Google Scholar
Phillips, T. W. and Strand, M. (1994) Larval secretions and food odors affect orientation in female Indian meal moth. Plodia interpunctella. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 71, 185193.Google Scholar
Phillips, T. W., Jiang, X. L., Burkholder, W. E., Phillips, J. K. and Tran, H. Q. (1993) Behavioral responses to food volatiles by two species of stored-product Coleoptera, Sitophilus oryzae (Curculionidae) and Tribolium castaneum (Tenebrionidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 19, 723734.Google Scholar
Phillips, T. W., Phillips, J. K., Webster, F. X., Tang, R. and Burkholder, W. E. (1996) Identification of sex pheromones from cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus, and related studies with C. analis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 22, 22332249.Google Scholar
Piñero, J. C. and Dorn, S. (2007) Synergism between aromatic compounds and green leaf volatiles derived from the host plant underlies female attraction in the oriental fruit moth. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 125, 185194.Google Scholar
Price, P. W., Denno, R. F., Eubanks, M. D., Finke, D. L. and Kaplan, I. (2011) Insect Ecology: Behavior, Populations, and Communities. Cambridge University Press, New York. 802 pp.Google Scholar
Rees, D. (2004) Insects of Stored Products. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.Google Scholar
Sano-Fujii, I. (1979) Effect of parental and developmental rate on the production of active form of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 10, 283293.Google Scholar
Sano-Fujii, I. (1984) Effect of bean water content on the production of the active form of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 20, 153161.Google Scholar
Scheirs, J., De Bruyn, L. and Verhagen, R. (2003) Host nutritive quality and host plant choice in two grass miners: Primary roles for primary compounds? Journal of Chemical Ecology 29, 13731389.Google Scholar
Sharma, K. R. and Fadamiro, H. Y. (2013) Fire ant alarm pheromone and venom alkaloids act in concert to attract parasitic phorid flies, Pseudacteon spp. Journal of Insect Physiology 59, 11191124.Google Scholar
Shiojiri, K. and Karban, R. (2006) Plant age, communication, and resistance to herbivores: Young sagebrush plants are better emitters and receivers. Oecologia 149, 214220.Google Scholar
Siderhurst, M. S. and Jang, E. B. (2010) Cucumber volatile blend attractive to female melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett). Journal of Chemical Ecology 36, 699708.Google Scholar
Singh, R. S. (1990) Insect Pests of Tropical Food Legumes. John Willey and Sons, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore. 467 pp.Google Scholar
Swella, G. B. and Mushobozy, D. M. K. (2009) Comparative susceptibility of different legume seeds to infestation by cowpea bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Plant Protection Science 45, 1924.Google Scholar
Tasin, M., Bäckman, A.-C., Bengtsson, M., Ioriatti, C. and Witzgall, P. (2006) Essential host plant cues in the grapevine moth. Naturwissenschaften 93, 141144.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. N. (1998) The evolution of diet breadth: Monophagy and polyphagy in swallowtail butterflies. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 11, 563578.Google Scholar
Umar, A. and Turaki, J. M. (2014) Comparative studies on the biology of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) on soya beans and bambara groundnut. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2, 5861.Google Scholar
Utida, S. (1972) Density dependent polymorphism in the adult of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 8, 111125.Google Scholar
Vallat, A. and Dorn, S. (2005) Changes in volatile emissions from apple trees and associated response of adult female codling moths over the fruit-growing season. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53, 40834090.Google Scholar
Visser, J. H. (1986) Host odour perception in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 31, 121144.Google Scholar
Wajnberg, E. and Haccou, P. (2008) Statistical tools for analyzing data on behavioral ecology of insect parasitoids, pp. 402429. In Behavioral Ecology of Insect Parasitoids: From Theoretical Approaches to Field Applications (edited by Wajnberg, E., Bernstein, C. and van Alphen, J.). Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Webster, B., Bruce, T., Dufour, S., Birkemeyer, C., Birkett, M., Hardie, J. and Pickett, J. (2008) Identification of volatile compounds used in host location by the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 34, 11531161.Google Scholar
Yu, S., Chen, Y., Zhang, L., Shan, M., Tang, Y. and Ding, A. (2011) Quantitative comparative analysis of the bio-active and toxic constituents of leaves and spikes of Schizonepeta tenuifolia at different harvesting times. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 12, 66356644. doi: 10.3390/ijms12106635.Google Scholar
Yuan, J. S., Himanen, S. J., Holopainen, J. K., Chen, F. and Neal Stewart, C. Jr. (2009) Smelling global climate change: Mitigation of function for plant volatile organic compounds. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24, 323331.Google Scholar
Zannou, E. T., Glitho, I. A., Huignard, J. and Monge, J. P. (2003) Life history of flight morph females of Callosobruchus maculatus F.: Evidence of a reproductive diapause. Journal of Insect Physiology 49, 575582.Google Scholar
Zebelo, S., Piorkowski, J., Disi, J. and Fadamiro, H. (2014) Secretions from the ventral eversible gland of Spodoptera exigua caterpillars activate defense-related genes and induce emission of volatile organic compounds in tomato, Solanum lycopersicum. BMC Plant Biology 14, 140.Google Scholar