Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:15:46.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparative study of domestic survey techniques for the Chagas' disease vector Triatoma infestans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

R. Pinchin
Affiliation:
Núcleo de Pesquisas de Produtos Naturais, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Bloco H, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 21941, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
D. M. Fanara
Affiliation:
Núcleo de Pesquisas de Produtos Naturais, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Bloco H, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 21941, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
C. W. Castleton
Affiliation:
Núcleo de Pesquisas de Produtos Naturais, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Bloco H, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 21941, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
A. M. Oliveira Filho
Affiliation:
Núcleo de Pesquisas de Produtos Naturais, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Bloco H, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 21941, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Get access

Abstract

The detection of household infestations of Triatominae in regions endemic for Chagas' disease is a criterion frequently used in the selection of areas, or of individual houses, for treatment in insecticide campaigns as well as for the evaluation of insecticide performance.

Several methods for the detection of domestic infestations with Triatominae were compared: diurnal capture of live bugs with the aid of a flushing-out agent, night-capture without using flushing-out agents and the use of cardboard boxes of the the Gómez-Núñez type. The flushing-out and Gómez-Núñez box methods were found to be equally sensitive, although each gave several houses as uninfested in which infestation was detected by the other method. The night-capture method was slightly more sensitive but was found to be impractical for large-scale surveys. Improvements to the flushing-out method, notably the introduction of a systematic search technique, made it much more sensitive than the Gómez-Núñez box method for both heavily infested houses and for houses 3 months after insecticide treatment.

Coating the inside surfaces of the boxes with adhesive did not increase the sensitivity of this method and, although this can be achieved by leaving the boxes in place for long periods of time, this also limits the value of the information thus obtained as regards the evaluation of insecticides. On the basis of the results presented, the flushing-out method using a systematic search of the house was found to be the most suitable sampling technique, but it is recognized that this method still has limitations.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arcoverde De Freitas, C. (1962) Combate á doença de Chagas (programa para 1962). Revta bras. Malar. Doenç. trop. 14, 415421.Google Scholar
Arcoverde De Freitas, C. (1974/1975) Alguns aspectos da epidemiologia e profilaxia da doença de Chagas no Brasil. Revta bras. Malar Doenç. trop. 26/27, 6192.Google Scholar
Bustamante, F. M., Carvalho, A. G., Verano, O. T. and Padilha, C. (1957) Observações sobre a ação dos inseticidas dieldrin e BHC contra O Triatoma infestons no interior das habitações. Revta bras. Malar. Doenç. trop. 9, 305311.Google Scholar
Bustamante, F. M. and Gusmão, J. B. (1954) Sobre a possibilidade de erradicação do Triatoma infestons com duas ou três aplicações domiciliares de BHC. Resultado de uma prova de campo. Revta bras. Malar. Doenç. trop. 6, 102113.Google Scholar
Dias, J. C. P. and Dias, R. B. (1979) Doença de Chagas— u ma visão socio-econômica e cultural. In Congresso International Sobre a Doença de Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
Dias, E., Silva Pinto, O., Pellegrino, J. and Castro, J. A. (1952) Ensaio experimental de luta contra os Triatomineos por meio de inseticida de ação residual. Revta bras. Malar. Doenç. trop. 4, 2246.Google Scholar
Fomm, A. S., Noda, J., Ishiata, G. K., and Maluf, F. (1971) Observações sobre reinfestações por T. infestons em area controlada por BHC, Estado de Sào Paulo, Brasil. Revta bras. Malar. Doenç. trop. 23, 2940.Google Scholar
Forattini, O. P., Juarez, E. and Corrêa, R. R. (1969a) Medida de infestação domiciliar por Triatoma infestons. Revta Saúde publ. São Paulo 3, 11–16.Google Scholar
Forattini, O. P., Juarez, E., Rabello, E. X., Pattoli, D. and Corrêa, R. R. (1969b) Infestação domiciliar por Triatoma infestons e alguns aspectos epidemiolôgicos da tripanossomose americana em área do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Revta Soude publ Sào Paulo 3, 159172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forattini, O. P., Rabello, E. X., Pattoli, D. G. B. and Corrêa, R. R. (1971) Observações sobre a infestaçào domiciliar residual por Triatoma infestons. Revta Soude publ. Sào Paulo 5, 1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamboa, C. J. (1965) Comprobacion de la presencia de Rhodnius prolixus en la vivienda rural. Boln. Dir. Malar. San. Amb. 5, 270274.Google Scholar
Gómez-Núñez, J. C. (1965) Desarrollo de um nuevo método para evaluar la infestaciôn intradomiciliaria por Rhodnius prolixus. Acta tient, venez. 16, 2631.Google Scholar
Pedreira De Freitas, J. L. (1963) Importância do expurgo seletivo dos domicilios e anexos para a profilaxia da molestia de Chagas pelo combate aos Triatomineos. Archos Hig. Sait de publ. 28, 217272.Google Scholar
Pinchin, R. (1981) Insecticide field trials for the control of Chagas' disease vectors: a review and recommendations. WHO/VBC unpublished document. In press.Google Scholar
Pinchin, R., Oliveira Filho, A. M., Ayala, C. A. C. and Gilbert, B. (1978) Slow-release insecticides for triatomine control: preliminary field trials. Revta bras. Malar. Doenç. trop. 30, 5763.Google ScholarPubMed
Pinchin, R., Oliveira Filho, A. M., Fanara, D. M. and Gilbert, B. (1980a) A preliminary field trial of decamethrin (OMS 1998) for the control of Triatoma infestons. WHO/VBC unpublished document No. 80.797.Google Scholar
Pinchin, R., Oliveira Filho, A. M. and Gilbert, B. (1979) Field trials of slow-release formulations of chlorpyrifos and malathion for the control of Chagas' disease vectors. Reuta bras. Malar. Doenç. trop. 31, 1927.Google Scholar
Pinchin, R., Oliveira Filho, A. M. and Gilbert, B. (1980b) Field trial of permethrin for the control of Triatoma infestons. WHO/VBC unpublished document, No. 80.779.Google Scholar
Pinchin, R., Oliveira Filho, A. M. and Pereira, A. C. B. (1980c) Flushing-out activity of pyrethrum and some synthetic pyrethroids on Panstrongylus megistus, a vector of Chagas’ disease. Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 74, 801803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinotti, M. (1954) Controle da doença de Chagas no Brasil. Revta bras. Malar Doenç. trop. 6, 301310.Google Scholar
Schenone, H., Villarroel, F., Rojas, A. and Carrasco, J. (1979) Estudio comparativo del rendimiento de tres métodos de detección de la presencia de Triatoma infestons. Boln chil. Parasit. 34, 721.Google Scholar
Schofield, C. J. (1978) A comparison of sampling techniques for domestic populations of Triatominae. Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 72, 449455.Google Scholar
Sherlock, I. A. (1976) Field evaluation of insecticides. In New Approaches in American Trypanosomiasis Research, pp. 279281. Scientific Publication No. 318. Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Tonn, R. J., Otero, M. A. and Jimenez, J. (1976) Comparación del método hora-hombre con la trampa Gómez-Núñez en la busqueda de Rhodnius prolixus. Boln Dir. Malar. San. Amb. 16, 269275.Google Scholar