Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:30:51.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical control of cereal stem-borers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

M. G. Jotwani
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India
Get access

Abstract

There are several stem-borer species recorded on important cereals such as rice, maize and sorghum as well as on grain legumes like cowpea. Those of considerable economic importance are: Chilo partellus, Sesamia infer ens, Sesamia eretica, Busseola fusca and Eldana saccharina on maize and sorghum; Sesamia infer ens. Chilo spp., Maliarpha separatella and Tryporyza incertulas on rice; and Maruca testu-lalis on cowpea.

Chemical control of insect pests will continue to be a major component of integrated pest management. However, control of tissue borers with insecticides is relatively more difficult than control of the insect pests feeding externally on foliage, shoots and stems. The foliar application of dust and spray formulation of most of the available insecticides has generally proved to be unsatisfactory as these cannot penetrate deep inside the tissues in sufficient quantities to kill the borers.

The recent advances in pest control technology, placing greater emphasis on use of various pest management components as well as insecticide selectively based on improved application methods has now made the control of stem-borers more effective and economical. Advantage can now be taken of the knowledge of the specific habits of the pests, period of peak activity of the most vulnerable stage and the economic thresholds for determining the appropriate time of application to control these pests. The development of new systemic insecticides and their granular formulation has further contributed towards the effective control of these borers. The recent research findings and recommendations for the control of cereal stem-borers are reviewed and discussed.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adeymi, S. A. O., Donnelly, J. and Odetoyinbo, J. A. (1966) Studies on chemical control of the stem-borers of maize. Niger. ayric. J. 3, 6166.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. M. and Young, W. R. (1969) Field studies on the chemical control of stem-borers, C. partellus on hybrid sorghum in India. J. econ. Ent. 62, 478482.Google Scholar
Al-Dabbas, A. K. and Al-Salih, G. A. (1978) [Chemical control of corn stem-borer, Sesamia cretica Led. (Lepidoptera-Phalaenidae) and determination of times of insecticide application] Yearbook of Plant Protection Research, Iraq, Ministry of Agriculture and Agrarian Reform (1974/1976) 1, 7981.Google Scholar
Ayoade, K. A. (1969) Insecticidal control of the pod-borer Maruca testulalis Gey. (Lepidoptera:Pyralidae) on west bred cowpea (Vigna sp.). Bull. ent. Soc. Niger. 5, 2333.Google Scholar
Ayoade, K. A. (1975) Preliminary investigations into the effects of some insecticides, sprayers and methods of applicationon the insect pests and yields of cowpea (Vigna unguieulata) (L.) Walp. Niger. J. Ent. 1, 133141.Google Scholar
Barry, B. D. and Andrews, D. (1971) A sprayer for the control of Busseola fusca in the whorls of sorghum. J. econ. Ent. 67, 310311.Google Scholar
Baskaran, P. (1971) Efficacy of soil applied insecticides for the control of sorghum shootfly and stem-borer. Ph.D. Thesis, Post-Graduate School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Caballero, G., De Vinuesa, J. I., Alvarado Cordobes, M. and Bernaldel Villar, J. M. (1972) (Comparative test of the effectiveness of azodrin and endrin against the maize borer 1971) Ensayo, comparative de eficacia del azodrin contra el taladro del maiz. ano 1971. Boletin Informativo de Plagas 90, 3136.Google Scholar
Centre for Overseas Pest Research London (1976) PANS Manual No. 3. Pest control in rice, 122–123.Google Scholar
Centre for Overseas Pest Research London (1981) Pest control in tropical grain legumes, p. 140.Google Scholar
Chatterji, S. M., Sarup, P., Bhamburkar, M. W., Marwaha, K. K., Panwar, V. P. S. and Siddiqui, K. H. (1972) Evolution of control schedule for the pests of maize with particular reference to stem-borer, Chilo zonellus (Swinhoe). Ind. J. Ent. 34, 142147.Google Scholar
Dina, S. O. (1977a) Effects of monocrotophos on insect damage and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguieulata) in Southern Nigeria. Expl Agric. 13, 155159.Google Scholar
Dina, S. O. (1977b) Insecticide testing program to increase grain yield in cowpea. Tropical Grain Legume Bull. 8, 1417.Google Scholar
Dina, S. O. and Medaiyedu, J. A. (1976) Field tests with insecticides to control Maruca testulalis and other pod boring insects of cowpea in Southern Nigeria. J. econ. Ent. 69, 173177.Google Scholar
Harris, K. M. (1962) Lepidopterous stem-borers of cereals in Nigeria. Bull. ent. Res. 53, 139171.Google Scholar
Jotwani, M. G. and Young, W. R. (1972) Recent development on chemical control of insect pests of sorghum. In Sorghum in Seventies (Ed. by Rao, N. G. P. and House, L. R.), pp. 377398. Oxford & IBH, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Noor, A. and Pareek, B. L. (1978) Relative effect of some insecticidal treatments on control of maize stem-borer. Entomon. 3, 193196.Google Scholar
Nye, I. W. B. (1960) The insect pests of graminaceous crops in East Africa. Colonial Res. Study 31, London Colonial Office.Google Scholar
Pathak, M. D. (1964) Recent developments in and future prospects for the chemical control of the rice stem-borers at IRRI. In The Major Insect Pests of Rice Plant. International Rice Research Institute, pp. 335349. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1967.Google Scholar
Pathak, M. D. (1969) Insect Pests of Rice. International Rice Research Institute. Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines, 77 pp.Google Scholar
Puttarudriah, M. (1958) Glimpses of agricultural entomology in Mysore. Dharwar agric. Coll. Mag. 11, 839.Google Scholar
Rensburg, J. B. J. and Walters, M. C. (1978) The efficacy of systemic insecticides applied to the soil for the control of Cicadulina mbila (Naude) (Hem. Cicadellidae) the vector of maize streak disease and the maize stalk-borer Busseola fusca (Fuller) (Lep. Noctuidae). Phytophylactica 10, 4952.Google Scholar
Rensburg, J. B. J., Walters, M. C. and Stemmet, G. P. (1978) A preliminary study on the application of carbofuran granules to the soil for the control of grain sorghum pests. Phytophylactica 10, 2830.Google Scholar
Saad, A. S. A. K. (1977) Aerial spraying for control of Sesamia cretica Led. on corn in Iraq (International Symposium on Phytopharmacy and Phytiatry 1977). Mededelingen van de Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen Rijksuniversiteit Gent (1977) 42, 911913.Google Scholar
Saad, A. S. A. K., Zeid, M. and El-Sebae, A. H. (1971) Chemical control of Sesamia cretica Led. Chilo agamemnon Bles. and Ostrinia nubilalis Hb. (Lepidoptera) and number of sprays required. Z. angew. Ent. 69, 9198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivagami, R. and Sulochna Bai, B. (1965) Experiments on the control of the cholam stem-borer, Chilo zonellus Swinhoe. Ind. J. Ent. 27, 249252.Google Scholar
Taley, Y. M. and Thakare, K. R. (1979) Chemical control of sorghum tissue borers. Ind. J. Ent. 41, 134138.Google Scholar
Trehan, K. N. and Butani, D. K. (1949) Note on life history, bionomics and control of Chilo zonellus (Swinhoe) in Bombay province. Indian J. Ent. 11, 4759.Google Scholar
Vaishampayan, S. M. and Veda, O. P. (1978) Sorghum stemborer, Chilo partellus (Swinh.) and its control by modern insecticides on hybrid sorghum. Pesticides 12, 1921.Google Scholar
Walters, M. C. and Drink Water, T. W. (1975) Preliminary studies on the application of systemic insecticides to the soil for the control of maize stalk-borer Busseola fusca (Fuller) (Lep: Noctuidae). Phytophylactica 7, 121123.Google Scholar
Young, W. R. (1962) Insect control studies. Sorghum Newslett. 5, 6364.Google Scholar