Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:55:19.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The biology and control of the sorghum shootfly, Atherigona soccata Rondani, in Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

B. Meksongsee
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology and Zoology, Department of Agriculture, Bangkok 9, Thailand
M. Chawanapong
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology and Zoology, Department of Agriculture, Bangkok 9, Thailand
U. Sangkasuwan
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology and Zoology, Department of Agriculture, Bangkok 9, Thailand
P. Poonyathaworn
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology and Zoology, Department of Agriculture, Bangkok 9, Thailand
Get access

Abstract

The biology of the sorghum shootfly, Atherigona soccata Rondani, was studied at the Corn and Sorghum Research Centre, Thailand. The preoviposition period is 3–5 days long. The females deposited a mean of 238 eggs with an average incubation period of 3 days. The larval development required an average of 7.8 days, and the pupal stage was 7.1 days long. The adults were reared with ordinary sugar, yeast and water. The females lived an average of 30 days and the males 20 days.

Carbofuran granular formulation is still the leading product for the control of the shootfly at the Research Centre. The application rate in the seed furrow is 0.45–0.60 kg a.i./ha with a row spacing of 75 cm. Furadan® 30ST, an emulsifiable formation of carbofuran, can also be used as a seed dressing at a rate of 20 cm3/kg of seeds. Counter®, another soil systematic insecticide, has been found effective in controlling the sorghum shootfly.

A modification of the ICRISAT trap for the sorghum shootfly is described. The trap may be effective in reducing the fly population.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anonymous (1975) Insecticidal control of the sorghum shootfly, Atherigona varia soccata Rondani. National Corn and Sorghum Program 1975, Annual Report, pp. 347349.Google Scholar
Barry, D. (1972) Notes of life history of a sorghum fly, Atherigona varia soccata. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65, 586589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, D. G. (1972) Some observations on the use of pheromone traps as a survey tool for Spodoptera lituralis. Miscellaneous Reports, COPR, London, 4.Google Scholar
Granados, Y. R. (1972) The role of wild hosts on the population dynamics of the sorghum shootfly in Thailand. In Control of Sorghum Shootfly (Jotwani, M. G. and Young, W. R.), pp. 112118. Oxford & IBH, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Meksongsee, B., Konkanjana, A., Sangkasuwan, U. and Young, W. R. (1978) Longevity and oviposition of sorghum shootfly adults on different diets. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 71, 852853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogwaro, K. (1978) Observations on longevity and fecundity of the sorghum shootfly, Atherigona soccata (Diptera; Anthomyiidae). Entomologia exp. appl. 23, 131138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seshu Reddy, K. V. & Davies, J. C. (1978) The use of attractant traps for the assessment of sorghum shootfly Atherigona soccata Rondani (Muscidae: Diptera) populations. Oriental Entomology Mini Workshop on Population Ecology in Relation to Insects of Economic Importance, 18–20 January 1978, Bangalore, 560 024, India.Google Scholar
Soto, P. E. (1972) Mass rearing of the sorghum shootfly and screening for host plant resistance under green-house conditions. In Control of Sorghum Shootfly (Ed. by Jotwani, M. G. and Young, W. R.), pp. 137148. Oxford & IBH, New Delhi.Google Scholar