Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:25:56.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Artificial rearing of the peach fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2014

P. Sookar ,
M. Alleck ,
N. Ahseek ,
S. Permalloo ,
S Bhagwant  and
C.L. Chang
P. Sookar*
Affiliation:
Entomology Division, Ministry of Agro Industry, Food Production and Security, Reduit, Republic of Mauritius
M. Alleck
Affiliation:
Entomology Division, Ministry of Agro Industry, Food Production and Security, Reduit, Republic of Mauritius
N. Ahseek
Affiliation:
Entomology Division, Ministry of Agro Industry, Food Production and Security, Reduit, Republic of Mauritius
S. Permalloo
Affiliation:
Entomology Division, Ministry of Agro Industry, Food Production and Security, Reduit, Republic of Mauritius
S Bhagwant
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius, Reduit, Republic of Mauritius
C.L. Chang
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius, Reduit, Republic of Mauritius US Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, 64 Nowelo St, Hilo Hawaii96720, USA
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Integration of the sterile insect technique (SIT) into the area-wide management of the peach fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) is a promising alternative to the localized use of chemical control tactics. Implementation of the SIT requires adequate numbers of sterile male insects that are produced in large mass-rearing facilities. The present study was carried out to improve the rearing methods of the peach fruit fly so as to contribute to the development of effective mass-rearing protocols. Commercially available papaya, mango, peach and guava juices were found to be equally effective as oviposition stimulants. Moreover, with respect to the fecundity and fertility of flies, water was found to be as effective as the tested fruit juices. During the first 3 weeks, 90% of the total eggs produced were collected from adult oviposition cages holding 50,000 flies. A larval diet composed of sugarcane bagasse, ground maize, sugarcane sugar, waste brewer's yeast, wheat bran, benzoic acid, nipagin and water resulted in the following values for the quality control parameters: egg hatch 85%, pupal recovery >67%, pupal weight >4.2 g, pupation >95%, adult emergence >89%, and fliers >65%. Adult emergence and flight ability were similar for pupae placed in sand and vermiculite as the pupation medium.

Keywords

rearingegging stimulantegging deviceliquid larval dietpupation mediumquality control parameters.
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 34 , Issue S1 , November 2014 , pp. S99 - S107
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burn, R. W. (1997) National Fly Control Programme: Report on Data Collection and Analysis. Entomology Division, Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Réduit, Mauritius. 134 pp.Google Scholar
Chang, C. L., Caceres, C. and Jang, E. B. (2004) A novel liquid larval diet and its rearing system for melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97, 524–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christenson, L. D. and Foote, R. H. (1960) Biology of fruit flies. Annual Review of Entomology 5, 171–192.Google Scholar
Churchill-Stanland, C., Stanland, R., Wong, T. T. Y., Tanaka, N., McInnis, D. O. and Dowell, R. V. (1986) Size as a factor in the mating propensity of Mediterranean fruit flies, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae), in the laboratory. Journal of Economic Entomology 79, 614–619.Google Scholar
DeBach, P. and Rosen, D. (1991) Biological control by Natural Enemies, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 140–148.Google Scholar
EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization) (2008) Bactrocera zonata. Available at:http://www.eppo.org/QUARANTINE/bactrocera_zonata/bactrocera.htm.Google Scholar
FAO/IAEA (2000) Action Plan: Peach Fruit Fly, Bactrocera zonata (Saunders). Joint FAO/IAEA Programme, Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
FAO/IAEA/USDA (2003) Joint FAO/IAEA Programme of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture. Manual, Version 5.0., Product Quality Control and Shipping Procedures for Sterile Mass-Reared Tephritid Fruit Flies. Available at:http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/ipc/public/ipc-mass-reared-tephritid.html. IAEA, Vienna, Austria. 85 pp.Google Scholar
Iwahashi, O. and Routhier, W. (2001) Aedeagal length and its variation of the peach fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) (Diptera: Tephritidae), which recently invaded Egypt. Applied Entomology and Zoology 36, 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapoor, V. C. (1993) Indian Fruit Flies (Insecta: Diptera: Tephritidae). International Science Publishers, New York, USA. 228 pp.Google Scholar
Klassen, W. (2005) Area-wide integrated pest management and the sterile insect technique, pp. 39–68. In Sterile Insect Technique. Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management (edited by Dyck, V. A., Hendrichs, J. and Robinson, A. S.). Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luck, R. F. and Dahlsten, D. L. (1975) Natural decline of a pine needle scale (Chionaspis pinifoliae (Fitch)), outbreak at South Lake Tahoe, California, following cessation of adult mosquito control with malathion. Ecology 56, 893–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAFNR (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Natural Resources) (1988) Entomology Division, pp. 53–61. In Annual Report for the Year 1988. Agricultural Services of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Natural Resources, Mauritius.Google Scholar
Miller, G. T. (2004) Sustaining the Earth, 6th edition. Thompson Learning, Inc., Pacific Grove, California, pp. 211–216.Google Scholar
Orian, J. E. A. and Moutia, L. A. (1960) Fruit flies of economic importance in Mauritius. Revue Agricole et Sucriere de L'Ile Maurice 39, 142–150.Google Scholar
Permalloo, S., Seewooruthun, S. I., Joomaye, A., Soonnoo, A. R., Gungah, B., Unmole, L. and Boodram, R. (1998) An area wide control of fruit flies in Mauritius, pp. 203–210. In Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of Agricultural Scientists (edited by Lalouette, J. A., Bachraz, D. Y., Sukurdeep, N. and Seebaluck, B. D.). Food and Agricultural Research Council, Réduit, Mauritius.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2001) SAS/STAT User's Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sharp, J. L., Boller, E. F. and Chambers, D. L. (1983) Selection for flight propensity of laboratory and wild strains of Anastrepha suspensa and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 76, 302–305.Google Scholar
Sookar, P., Permalloo, S., Gungah, B., Alleck, M., Seewooruthun, S. I. and Soonnoo, A. R. (2008) An area wide control of fruit flies in Mauritius, pp. 261–269. In Fruit Flies of Economic Importance: From Basic to Applied Knowledge. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Fruit Flies of Economic Importance. 10–15 September 2006, Salvador, Brazil (edited by Sugayama, R. L., Zucchi, R. A., Ovruski, S. M. and Sivinski, J.). Biofábrica Moscamed Brasil, SBPC, Salvador, Brazil.Google Scholar
Soonnoo, A. R., Smith, E. S. C., Joomaye, A., Permalloo, S. and Gungah, B. (1996) A large scale fruit fly control programme in Mauritius, pp. 52–60. In Problems and Management of Tropical Fruit Flies. Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Tropical Fruit Flies (edited by Chua, T. H. and Khoo, S. G.). Kuala Lumpur. The Working Group on Malaysian Fruit Flies, Universiti Malaya.Google Scholar
Tanaka, N. (1965) Artificial egging receptacles for three species of tephritid flies. Journal of Economic Entomology 58, 177–178.Google Scholar
Tanaka, N., Steiner, L. F., Ohinata, K. and Okamoto, R. (1969) Low-cost larval rearing medium for mass production of oriental and Mediterranean fruit flies. Journal of Economic Entomology 62, 967–968.Google Scholar
Van Driesche, R. G. and Taub, G. (1983) Impact of parasitoids on Phyllonorycter leafminers infesting apple in Massachussetts, USA. Protection Ecology 5, 303–317.Google Scholar
Vargas, R. I. and Chang, H. B. (1991) Evaluation of oviposition stimulants for mass production of melon fly, oriental fruit fly, and Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 84, 1695–1698.Google Scholar
Vargas, R. I., Chang, H. B. C., Komura, M. and Kawamoto, D. S. (1986) Evaluation of two pupation methods for mass production of Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 79, 864–867.Google Scholar
Vreysen, M. J. B., Robinson, A. S. and Hendrichs, J. (eds) (2007) Area-Wide Control of Insect Pests. From Research to Field Implementation. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 789 pp.Google Scholar
White, I. M. and Elson-Harris, M. (1994) Fruit Flies of Economic Significance: Their Identification and Bionomics. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. 601 pp.Google Scholar