Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Raab, Stephen S.
Grzybicki, Dana Marie
Hart, Alison R.
Kiely, Sharon
Andrew-JaJa, Carey
and
Scioscia, Eugene
2002.
Willingness to Pay for New Papanicolaou Test Technologies.
American Journal of Clinical Pathology,
Vol. 117,
Issue. 4,
p.
524.
Shackley, Phil
and
Donaldson, Cam
2002.
Should we use willingness to pay to elicit community preferences for health care?.
Journal of Health Economics,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 6,
p.
971.
Zillich, Alan J.
Blumenschein, Karen
Johannesson, Magnus
and
Freeman, Patricia
2002.
Assessment of the Relationship Between Measures of Disease Severity, Quality of Life, and Willingness to Pay in Asthma.
PharmacoEconomics,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 4,
p.
257.
Whynes, David K
Frew, Emma
and
Wolstenholme, Jane L
2003.
A comparison of two methods for eliciting contingent valuations of colorectal cancer screening.
Journal of Health Economics,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 4,
p.
555.
Greenberg, Dan
Bakhai, Ameet
Neumann, Peter J.
and
Cohen, David J.
2004.
Willingness to pay for avoiding coronary restenosis and repeat revascularization: results from a contingent valuation study.
Health Policy,
Vol. 70,
Issue. 2,
p.
207.
Roux, Larissa
Ubach, Christina
Donaldson, Cam
and
Ryan, Mandy
2004.
Valuing the Benefits of Weight Loss Programs: An Application of the Discrete Choice Experiment.
Obesity Research,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 8,
p.
1342.
Skinner, Tom
Miller, Howard
and
Bryant, Chris
2005.
The literature on the economic causes of and policy responses to obesity.
Food Economics - Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
128.
Reichl, Verena
2005.
Prospektive Auswirkungen der Kosteneinsparung im Gesundheitswesen auf Ärzte, Patienten und die Industrie.
p.
273.
Le Goff-Pronost, Myriam
and
Nassiri, Nabil
2005.
Two New Approaches for Telemedicine Economic Evaluation: Contingent Evaluation and Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (Deux Approches Nouvelles Pour L'evaluation Economique De La Telemedecine: L'evaluation Contingente Et L'Analyse Multicritere).
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Bolin, Kristian
Lindgren, Björn
and
Rössner, Stephan
2006.
The significance of overweight and obesity for individual health behaviour: An economic analysis based on the Swedish surveys of living conditions 1980—81, 1988—89, and 1996—97.
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 4,
p.
422.
Martin, Louis F.
2007.
Surgical Management of Obesity.
p.
57.
Cawley, John
2008.
Contingent valuation analysis of willingness to pay to reduce childhood obesity.
Economics & Human Biology,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 2,
p.
281.
Stokes, Robert J.
MacDonald, John
and
Ridgeway, Greg
2008.
Estimating the effects of light rail transit on health care costs.
Health & Place,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
45.
Sjöström, Lars
2008.
Handbook of Obesity.
p.
503.
Martin, Louis F.
2009.
Tratamiento Quirúrgico de la Obesidad.
p.
57.
Liu, Jin-Tan
Tsou, Meng-Wen
and
Hammitt, James K.
2009.
Willingness to pay for weight-control treatment.
Health Policy,
Vol. 91,
Issue. 2,
p.
211.
Romé, Åsa
Persson, Ulf
Ekdahl, Charlotte
and
Gard, Gunvor
2010.
Willingness to pay for health improvements of physical activity on prescription.
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 2,
p.
151.
Jonas, Daniel E.
Russell, Louise B.
Chou, Jon
and
Pignone, Michael
2010.
Willingness‐to‐pay to avoid the time spent and discomfort associated with screening colonoscopy.
Health Economics,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 10,
p.
1193.
Fu, Tsu-Tan
Lin, Yih-Ming
and
Huang, Chung L.
2011.
Willingness to pay for obesity prevention.
Economics & Human Biology,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 3,
p.
316.
Havet, Nathalie
Morelle, Magali
Remonnay, Raphaël
and
Carrere, Marie-Odile
2011.
Valuing the Benefit for Cancer Patients of Receiving Blood Transfusions at Home.
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 3,
p.
1.