Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:52:34.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Value of information analysis for a new technology: Computer-assisted total knee replacement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2007

Hengjin Dong ,
Doug Coyle  and
Martin Buxton
Hengjin Dong
Affiliation:
Heidelberg University
Doug Coyle
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Martin Buxton
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to demonstrate how value of information analysis can measure the upper limit on returns to future research and identify the research priorities for computer-assisted total knee replacement (CAS-TKR).

Methods: Using a previous economic analysis of CAS-TKR compared with conventional TKR, the population expected value of perfect information (EVPI) was calculated using Monte Carlo simulation to provide an estimate of the upper limit on returns to future research. The population expected value of partial perfect information (EVPPI) for both individual parameters and groups of parameters was estimated to inform specific future research priorities.

Results: The UK individual EVPI would be £21.4 if the willingness to pay for one QALY (quality-adjusted life-year) were £30,000. The population EVPPI would be £8.3 million, assuming a 10-year time horizon for CAS-TKR. In this instance, the expected value of information is positively related to willingness to pay for one QALY for the range of £0 to £50,000. Although each individual parameter had an EVPPI of £0, groups of utility parameters had positive EVPPI. Population EVPPI was £5.6 million for utility parameters, £20,000 for transition probabilities relating to CAS-TKR, and £5,000 for transition probabilities related to conventional TKR.

Conclusions: The study provides evidence on which parameters further information may be of most value. Focusing research on the utility values associated with health states relating to TKR would be of greatest value.

Keywords

Total knee replacementComputer-assisted surgeryValue of information analysis
Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , July 2007 , pp. 337 - 342
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ades AE, Lu G, Claxton K. 2004 Expected value of sample information calculations in medical decision modeling. Med Decis Making. 24: 207– 227.Google Scholar
Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, et al. 2004 Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 86: 682– 687.Google Scholar
Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, et al. 2004 Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 86: 818– 823.Google Scholar
Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. 2004 Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 86: 372– 377.Google Scholar
Claxton K, Neumann PJ, Araki S, Weinstein MC. 2001 Bayesian value-of-information analysis. An application to a policy model of Alzheimer's disease. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 17: 38– 55.Google Scholar
Coyle D, Buxton MJ, O'Brien BJ. 2003 Measures of importance for economic analysis based on decision modeling. J Clin Epidemiol. 56: 989– 997.Google Scholar
Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F. 1998: Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 49– 56.Google Scholar
Dong H, Buxton M. 2006 Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: A Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 22: 191– 202.Google Scholar
Figgie HE III, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS III, Gordon NH. 1986 The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 68: 1035– 1340.Google Scholar
Gaweda K, Jablonski M. 2000 Function of patellofemoral joints after total knee replacement with polyethylene patellar articular surface in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. J Orthopaed Traumatol. 2: 79– 82.Google Scholar
Hassaballa MA, Porteous AJ, Newman JH. 2004 Observed kneeling ability after total, unicompartmental and patellofemoral knee arthroplasty: Perception versus reality. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 12: 136– 139.Google Scholar
Her Majesty's Treasury. Appraisal and evaluation in central government. 2003. Available at: URL://greenbook.treasury.gov.uk.
Kane RL, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, et al. 2003. Total knee replacement. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 86 (prepared by Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota). AHRQ Publication No. 04-E006-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality;
National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 2005. 2nd annual report. Available at: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/documents/reports/NJR2_part_2.pdf; Accessed: March 21, 2006.
NHS National Institute for Clinical Excellence. 2004. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: NHS National Institute for Clinical Excellence;
Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. 2003 Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 85: 830– 835.Google Scholar