Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:54:34.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Technology Assessment—Answers to all Questions?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

1. Editorial. Warnock proposals in trouble. Nature, 1985, 313, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Grobstein, C., Flower, M., & Mendeloff, J.Frozen Embryos: Policy Issues. New England Journal of Medicine, 1985, 24, 15841588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Gutzwiller, F., Grob, P., Boppart, I., & Marguerat, P.Swiss AFP Screening Collaborative Group. Results of a nationwide AFP Pilot-Screening Program. Bulletin des Médecins Suisses, 1985, 66, 264273.Google Scholar
4.Holtzman, N. A.Screening for Congenital Abnormalities. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1985, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.McNeil, B. J. Preface. In Critical Issues in Medical Technology, McNeil, B. J. & Cravalho, E. G. (eds.), Boston, Mass.: Auburn House Publishing Company, 1982, v–viii.Google Scholar
6.Modell, B.Chorionic Villus Sampling—Evaluating Safety and Efficacy. Lancet, 1985, 1, 737740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Perry, T. B., Vekemans, M.J. J., Lippman, A. et al. , Chorionic villi sampling: clinical experience, immediate complications, and patient attitudes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985, 151, 161–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed