Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T06:29:01.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technology assessment, priority setting and appropriate care in Dutch health care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2004

Marc Berg ,
Tom van der Grinten  and
Niek Klazinga
Marc Berg
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Tom van der Grinten
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Niek Klazinga
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

References 8, 29, and 32 are incorrect as they appear in the article entitled “Technology assessment, priority setting, and appropriate care in Dutch health care,” by Marc Berg, Tom van der Grinten, and Niek Klazinga (Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20[1]:35-43). They should appear as follows: 8. Burgers JS, Bailey JV, Klazinga NS, et al. Inside guidelines: comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries. Diabetes Care 2002;11:1933-1939.29. Zwart-van Rijkom JE, Leufkens HG, Busschbach JJ, et al. Differences in attitudes, knowledge and use of economic evaluations in decision-making in The Netherlands. The Dutch results from the EUROMET Project. Pharmacoeconomics 2000;2:149-160.32. Van der Grinten TED. Hervorming van de gezondheidszorg. Zal het deze keer wel lukken? Beleid & Maatschappij 2002;3:172-176.

Type
ERRATUM
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , November 2004 , pp. 564
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)