Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:51:26.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Technology assessment and knowledge brokering: The case of assisted reproduction in The Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2006

Jessika van Kammen
Affiliation:
Netherlands Organisation for Research and Development ZonMw
Carin W. Jansen
Affiliation:
Paediatric Association of the Netherlands
Gouke J. Bonsel
Affiliation:
Amsterdam Medical Centre
Jan A. M. Kremer
Affiliation:
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
Johannes L. H. Evers
Affiliation:
Maastricht University
Juriy W. Wladimiroff
Affiliation:
Erasmus Medical Centre

Abstract

Objectives: Even when policy makers show interest and evidence-informed and convincing HTA studies are available, use of assessment products is not guaranteed. In this article, we report our experience with knowledge brokering to foster evidence-informed policy making on cost-effective treatment and reimbursement of assisted reproduction in The Netherlands.

Methods: From earlier work in the field of knowledge brokering, we foresaw the need for a deliberative strategy to manage the inherent tension between scientific rigor demanded by researchers and responsiveness to real-time needs demanded by policy makers. Therefore, we structured the process in three distinct steps: (i) agreement about the main messages from the research, (ii) analysis of the policy context and of the meaning of the main messages for the actors involved, and (iii) an invitational meeting to make recommendations for action.

Results: One of the recommendations that would require changes in ministerial policy was followed up instantly, whereas the other recommendation is still under debate. The Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology activated the revision of two guidelines. The patient organization uses the new scientific insights in informing members and the public. Closing the loop, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) funded research to close knowledge gaps that became apparent in the process.

Conclusions: Knowledge brokering is a promising approach to bring HTA into practice. We conclude that the methodologies to feed research results into the policy process are still in an incipient stage and need further development.

Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agence d'évaluation des technologies et des mode d'intervention en santé. Available at: http://www.aetmis.gouv.qc.ca/site/index.php?en_publication. Accessed 2 November 2005.
Canadian Health Services Research Foundation and the NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D Program. 2005 Making evidence synthesis more useful for management and policy-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 10 (Suppl 1). Available at: http://select.ingentaconnect.com/rsm/13558196/contp1-1.htm. Accessed 2 November 2005.
Ham C, Hunter DJ, Robinson R. 1995 Evidence based policymaking. BMJ. 310: 712.Google Scholar
Lomas J. 2001 Using ‘linkage and exchange’ to move research into policy at a Canadian Foundation. Health Aff (Millwood). 19: 236240.Google Scholar
Lomas J. 2005 Using research to inform healthcare managers' and policy makers' questions: From summative to interpretive synthesis. Healthcare Policy. 1: 5571.Google Scholar
Weiss C. 1979 The many meanings of research utilisation. Publ Adm Rev. 39: 426431.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. The Mexico statement on health research. Knowledge for better health: strengthening health systems. From the Ministerial Summit on Health Research; November 16-20, 2004; Mexico DF. Available at: http://www.who.int/rpc/summit/agenda/en/mexico_statement_on%20health_research2.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2005.