Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T01:47:01.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REAL-WORLD CLINICAL EVALUATION AND COSTS OF TELEMEDICINE FOR CHRONIC WOUND MANAGEMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2018

Myriam Le Goff-Pronost ,
Bénédicte Mourgeon ,
Jean-Pierre Blanchère ,
Luc Teot ,
Hervé Benateau  and
Anne Dompmartin
Myriam Le Goff-Pronost
Affiliation:
IMT Atlantique (Télécom Bretagne), [email protected]
Bénédicte Mourgeon
Affiliation:
réseau TELAP
Jean-Pierre Blanchère
Affiliation:
réseau TELAP
Luc Teot
Affiliation:
CHU Montpellier, réseau Cicat LR
Hervé Benateau
Affiliation:
chirurgie maxillo-faciale CHU
Anne Dompmartin
Affiliation:
Caen University Hospital Center
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Chronic wounds are frequent, affect quality of life, and increase care costs. Telemedicine provides potential for effective wound care management, especially for the monitoring of complex wounds at home.

Objectives:

The objective of the present study was to determine the clinical effects and costs of telemedicine for the follow-up of complex chronic wounds from the perspective of the public health insurance. The study ran over a period of 9 months.

Methods:

We conducted a prospective, pragmatic, open-label, observational study and carried out a cost-effectiveness analysis. A total of 116 patients with chronic wounds were assigned to their choice of two groups: telemedicine (N = 77) and traditional follow-up (control; N = 39). The primary outcome was the time to healing. Secondary outcomes included percentage of wounds reaching target objective, percentage of wounds healed completely, outpatient care costs, travel costs, and hospitalizations.

Results:

Time to healing was shorter in the telemedicine group than in the control group (137 versus 174 days; p < .05). The percentage of wounds completely healed was not statistically different between the telemedicine and control group (66 percent versus 61 percent; p > .05). Outpatient care and hospitalization costs were not significantly different. The main results in terms of economic savings were medical transport costs reimbursed by the French public health insurance, which were significantly lower in the telemedicine group. Telemedicine costs were found to be €4,583 less per patient compared with standard practice over 9 months.

Conclusions:

This trial suggests that telemedicine saves travel costs and results in a shorter healing time than traditional follow-up.

Keywords

Cost analysisTelemedicineComplex woundHealingHealthcare spending
Type
Assessment
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 34 , Issue 6 , 2018 , pp. 567 - 575
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank the funders of the study: the French digital health agency ASIP Santé; the Regional Health Agency (ARS) of Basse-Normandie; the ARS of Languedoc-Roussillon; and the healthcare cooperation consortium GCS e-health. We also thank the Regional Directorate of Health Insurance of Rouen, in particular Dr. Kuhn, and all health professionals and patients of TELAP network who participated in the trial. No conflicts of interest.

References

REFERENCES

1.Graham, I, Harrison, M, Nelson, E, Lorimer, K, Fisher, A. Prevalence of lower-limb ulceration: A systematic review of prevalence studies. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2003;16:305–316.Google Scholar
2.Järbrink, K, Ni, G, Sönnergren, H, et al. Prevalence and incidence of chronic wounds and related complications: A protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2016;5:152.Google Scholar
3.Gottrup, F. A specialized wound-healing center concept: Importance of a multidisciplinary department structure and surgical treatment facilities in the treatment of chronic wounds. Am J Surg. 2004;187:38S–43S.Google Scholar
4.Nordheim, LV, Haavind, MT, Iversen, MM. Effect of telemedicine follow-up care of leg and foot ulcers: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv. Res 2014;14:565.Google Scholar
5.Tricco, AC, Antony, J, Vafei, A, et al. Seeking effective interventions to treat complex wounds: An overview of systematic reviews. BMC Med. 2015;13:2–23.Google Scholar
6.Tricco, AC, Cogo, E, Isaranuwatchai, W, et al. A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of complex wound interventions reveals optimal treatments for specific wound types. BMC Med. 2015;13:90.Google Scholar
7.Wicke, C, Bachinger, A, Coerper, S, et al. Aging influences wound healing in patients with chronic lower extremity wounds treated in a specialized wound care center. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:25–33.Google Scholar
8.Gorecki, C, Brown, JM, Nelson, EA, et al. European Quality of Life Pressure Ulcer Project group. Impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life in older patients: A systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:1175e83.Google Scholar
9.Guest, JF, Ayoub, N, McIlwraith, T, et al. Health economic burden that different wound types impose on the UK's National Health Service. Int Wound J. 2017;14:322–330.Google Scholar
10.Kolltveit, B, Gjengedal, E, Graue, M, et al. Telemedicine in diabetes foot care delivery: Health care professionals’ experience. BMC Health Serv. Res 2016;16:134.Google Scholar
11.Sood, A, Granick, MS, Trial, C, et al. The role of telemedicine in wound care: A review and analysis of a database of 5,795 patients from a mobile wound-healing center in Languedoc-Roussillon, France. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:248S–256S.Google Scholar
12.Chanussot-Deprez, C, Contreras-Ruiz, J. Telemedicine in wound care: A review. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2013;26:78–82.Google Scholar
13.Bergmo, TS. How to measure costs and benefits of eHealth interventions: An overview of methods and frameworks. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:11.Google Scholar
14.Arora, M, Harvey, LA, Glinsky, JV, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of telephone-based support for the management of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in India and Bangladesh. Spinal Cord. 2017;55:1071.Google Scholar
15.Stern, A, Mitsakakis, N, Paulden, M, et al. Pressure ulcer multidisciplinary teams via telemedicine: A pragmatic cluster randomized stepped wedge trial in long term care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:83.Google Scholar
16.Fasterholdt, I, Gerstrøm, M, Rasmussen, BSB, et al. Cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring of diabetic foot ulcer patients. Health Informatics J. 2018;24:245–258.Google Scholar
17.HAS, Haute Autorité de Santé. Dressings: Indications and recommended uses. Leaflet on good practice in health care technology use, 2011, Paris: HAS.Google Scholar
18.Makady, A, de Boer, A, Hillege, H, Klungel, O, Goettsch, W. What is real -world data? A review of definitions based on literature and stakeholder interviews. Value Health. 2017;20:858–865.Google Scholar
19.Terry, M, Halstead, LS, O'Hare, P, et al. Feasibility study of home care wound management using telemedicine. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009;22:358–364.Google Scholar
20.Jelnes, R. Telemedicine in the management of patients with chronic wounds. J Wound Care. 2011;20:187–190.Google Scholar
21.Rees, RS, Bashshur, N. The effects of TeleWound management on use of service and financial outcomes. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13:663–674.Google Scholar
22.Wootton, R, Bahaadinbeigy, K, Hailey, D. Estimating travel reduction associated with the use of telemedicine by patients and healthcare professionals: Proposal for quantitative synthesis in a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:185.Google Scholar
23.Rodrigues, JJ, Pedro, LM, Vardasca, T, de la Torre-Díez, I, Martins, HM. Mobile health platform for pressure ulcer monitoring with electronic health record integration. Health Informatics J. 2013;19:300–311.Google Scholar
24.Wiseman, JT, Fernandes-Taylor, S, Barnes, ML, et al. Conceptualizing smartphone use in outpatient wound assessment: Patients’ and caregivers’ willingness to use technology. J Surg Res. 2015;198:245–251.Google Scholar
25.Zarchi, K, Haugaard, VB, Dufour, DN, Jemec, GB. Expert advice provided through telemedicine improves healing of chronic wounds: Prospective cluster controlled study. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135:895–900.Google Scholar
26.Ameen, J, Coll, AM, Peters, M. Impact of tele-advice on community nurses' knowledge of venous leg ulcer care. Adv Nurs. 2005;50:583–594.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Le Goff-Pronost et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Le Goff-Pronost et al. supplementary material(File)
File 33 KB