Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Heitman, Elizabeth
1998.
Ethical Issues in Technology Assessment:Conceptual Categories and Procedural Considerations.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 3,
p.
544.
Harper, Gareth
Townsend, Joy
and
Buxton, Martin
1998.
The Preliminary Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies for the Prioritization of Health Technology Assessments: A Discussion.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 4,
p.
652.
Oortwijn, Wija
Banta, David
Vondeling, Hindrik
and
Bouter, Lex
1999.
Identification and priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands: actors and activities.
Health Policy,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 3,
p.
241.
Weedon, David
1999.
Health technology assessment in Australia.
Medical Journal of Australia,
Vol. 171,
Issue. 10,
p.
551.
Giacomini, Mita K.
1999.
The Which-Hunt: Assembling Health Technologies for Assessment and Rationing.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 4,
p.
715.
Taylor, Rod
2001.
Pharmaceutical Regulation: The Early Experience of the NHS National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) Appraisal Process—Where Are We Headed? Presented at the ISPOR 5th Annual International Meeting, Crystal City, VA, 24 May 2000.
Value in Health,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 1,
p.
8.
Boer, A
2001.
Wordt er na het NHG-wetenschapsbeleid beter vraaggestuurd onderzoek verricht?.
Huisarts en Wetenschap,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 3,
p.
706.
Oortwijn, Wija J
Vondeling, Hindrik
van Barneveld, Teus
van Vugt, Christel
and
Bouter, Lex M
2002.
Priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands: principles and practice.
Health Policy,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 3,
p.
227.
McDaid, David
and
Cookson, Richard
2003.
Evaluating health care interventions in the European Union.
Health Policy,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 2,
p.
133.
Sassi, Franco
2003.
Setting priorities for the evaluation of health interventions: when theory does not meet practice.
Health Policy,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 2,
p.
141.
Fleurence, Rachael L
and
Torgerson, David J
2004.
Setting priorities for research.
Health Policy,
Vol. 69,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
García-Altés, Anna
2004.
La introducción de tecnologías en los sistemas sanitarios: del dicho al hecho.
Gaceta Sanitaria,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 5,
p.
398.
Oliver, Adam
Mossialos, Elias
and
Robinson, Ray
2004.
Health technology assessment and its influence on health-care priority setting.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Poluta, M.
Nunziata, E.
Knaflitz, M.
and
Balestra, G.
2005.
Do we have the data to take informed decisions in Healthcare Technology Management (HTM) related issues? A Conceptual HTM-IS Framework.
p.
7099.
Douw, Karla
and
Vondeling, Hindrik
2006.
Selection of new health technologies for assessment aimed at informing decision making: A survey among horizon scanning systems.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 2,
p.
177.
Douw, Karla
Vondeling, Hindrik
and
Oortwijn, Wija
2006.
Priority setting for horizon scanning of new health technologies in Denmark: Views of health care stakeholders and health economists.
Health Policy,
Vol. 76,
Issue. 3,
p.
334.
Fleurence, Rachael L.
2007.
Setting priorities for research: a practical application of ‘payback’ and expected value of information.
Health Economics,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 12,
p.
1345.
Schneider, A.
von Knebel-Doeberitz, M.
Muth, C.
Kühn, W.
and
von Keyserling, H.
2007.
Sekundäre Prävention des Zervixkarzinoms: aktueller Stand der Diagnostik.
Der Gynäkologe,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 5,
p.
377.
Bridges, John F. P.
and
Jones, Christopher
2007.
Patient-based health technology assessment: A vision of the future.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 1,
p.
30.
Noorani, Hussein Z.
Husereau, Donald R.
Boudreau, Rhonda
and
Skidmore, Becky
2007.
Priority setting for health technology assessments: A systematic review of current practical approaches.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 3,
p.
310.