Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:31:59.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PP072 Applying Sensitivity Analysis For Robust Choice Of Health Technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
INTRODUCTION:

The aim of this work is to evaluate the stability and robustness of the solution obtained at the end of the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) process by conducting a sensitivity analysis. Sensitivity analysis allows identification of the elements representing the source of uncertainty and to determine the impact of this variability on the stability of the assessment results, in order to provide more adequate and objective support to decision-making process.

METHODS:

A new method for health technologies evaluation, Decision-oriented HTA (1), which integrates the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) (2) in the model Core Model® of the European Network for HTA (EUnetHTA) was taken into account. In this context, a mathematical model was implemented to conduct a sensitivity analysis on weights and on performance values of the technology alternatives evaluated. The objective is to evaluate the effects on AHP results induced by a change on initial values of each criterion of the decision-making model. Sensitivity analysis was carried out by calculating the minimum changes of the weights and performances needed to reverse the current ranking of alternatives technologies (3).

RESULTS:

This approach was applied to some technology assessment studies such as video-laparoscopy, femtosecond laser, da Vinci robot, to test their efficacy and reliability. It is very important to perform a sensitivity analysis and assure the stability of the solution when the performance values associated to the technology alternatives are close because, in this case, a small change of performance values reversed the ranking of alternatives technologies.

CONCLUSIONS:

Applying sensitivity analysis to such decision-making processes is essential to ensure the consistency of final decisions. This evidence has shown that this method allows for a more rapid interpretation of results, thus facilitating the choice of decision-makers about the decision to invest or not in new technology.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

References

REFERENCES:

1. Ritrovato, M, Faggiano, FC, Tedesco, G, et al. Decision-Oriented Health Technology Assessment: one-step forward in supporting the decision making process in hospitals. Value Health. 2015;18 (4):505–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Saaty, TL. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. NewYork: McGraw-Hill, 1980.Google Scholar
3. Triantaphyllou, E, Sánchez, A. A Sensitivity Analysis Approach for Some Deterministic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods. Decision Sciences 1997;28 (1):151194.Google Scholar