Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T16:47:58.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PD91 Gaps And Challenges In The Health Technology Assessment Of Genetic And Genomic Applications: A Systematic Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2025

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Evaluating genetic and genomic applications is critical for their adoption in healthcare practice, but this has several challenges, including limited evidence on clinical and non-clinical benefits and rapid development processes. Since these challenges lack comprehensive discussion, this study aimed to identify and analyze all the barriers emerging in the health technology assessment (HTA) of genetic and genomic tests.

Methods

The protocol of this study was registered in the Open Science Framework database. A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science bibliographic databases was undertaken to identify all studies that specifically discussed any difficulty, gap, or barrier in the HTA evaluation of genetic or genomic technologies. No restrictions were imposed on HTA domain, study type, or publication date. Gaps and challenges were then grouped into domains outlined in the EUnetHTA HTA Core Model®. A narrative synthesis of the results was performed for each HTA domain.

Results

Of the 457 publications identified, 23 were included. Article designs exhibited considerable diversity, ranging from systematic reviews to semi-structured interviews, and stakeholder involvement varied from universities to national research groups. The challenges we found referred to the general HTA framework or, in most cases, to specific domains. More than 25 percent of the challenges were associated with economic aspects, with cost-effectiveness analysis being the focal point of debate. In addition, clinical effectiveness, in terms of non-health outcomes, lack of evidence, and clinical utility, was also frequently discussed, accounting for 23 percent of the challenges identified.

Conclusions

Our study systematically summarized gaps and barriers in the HTA of genetic and genomic applications, providing a thorough analysis and categorization of these issues. Various challenges surfaced across different domains, notably related to costs, economic evaluation, and clinical effectiveness. There is a need for exhaustive discussions on potential solutions to facilitate and enhance the assessment process for these genetic and genomic applications.

Type
Poster Presentations (online)
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press