Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:23:12.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PD53 Improving Patient Involvement In The National Institute For Health And Care Excellence’s Appeals Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2022

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Involving patients in the health technology assessment (HTA) lifecycle is a core principle at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) that helps build public confidence in healthcare decision-making. The last stage in this lifecycle is an appeal whereby stakeholders, including patient organizations, can appeal against the HTA committee’s decision based on two specific grounds: (i) the committee has failed to act fairly or NICE has exceeded its powers; and (ii) the recommendation is unreasonable considering the evidence submitted to NICE. Improving patient involvement in the appeals process was identified as a key area from consultative work undertaken with patient organizations in 2019.

Methods

In September 2020, surveys were sent to patient organizations for their feedback. The organizations received a survey tailored to their circumstances in relation to the following four outcomes.

  1. (i) An appeal was lodged that: (a) resulted in an appeal hearing; or (b) did not result in an appeal hearing.

  2. (ii) An appeal was not lodged but the organization had received: (a) negative guidance; or (b) ‘optimized’ guidance.

Results

Sixteen responses were received across the four surveys. The key findings in priority order were as follows.

  1. (i) The legalist nature of appeal hearings is off-putting.

  2. (ii) The online appeals guide and template letter are not easy to use.

  3. (iii) Organizations would like more information on appeal hearings and timelines.

  4. (iv) Organizations would like patient-friendly materials and training on par with the support they receive for other HTA participation.

Conclusions

As a result of these findings, we are iteratively developing materials to support patient organizations, including:

  • a glossary;

  • a redesigned appeals web page with clearer timelines and a template letter;

  • a ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ document specifically for patient organizations; and

  • a video podcast from a lay appeals panel Chair explaining appeals in a patient-friendly way.

We are also including a section on appeals in our introductory training for all patient organizations participating in medicines HTAs.

Type
Poster Debate
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press