Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T19:01:59.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PD26 Seeking Sustainability For The Brazilian Public Healthcare System: Cost-Utility Analysis Of Pembrolizumab For Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2025

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Pembrolizumab is used as a monotherapy or in addition to chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as an alternative to platinum-based chemotherapy. The objective was to conduct a cost-utility analysis for subgroups of patients with NSCLC using the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) threshold of BRL120,000 (USD24,458) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).

Methods

We built a partitioned survival model with three health states based on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves for three scenarios according to programed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression as follows: (i) pembrolizumab monotherapy for at least 50 percent PD-L1; (ii) pembrolizumab monotherapy for at least one percent PD-L1; and (iii) pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for one to 49 percent PD-L1. The outcome of interest was QALYs, so utility values were derived from pre- and post-progression states according to the treatment received. Survival curves were extrapolated for 20 years using different distributions. The best fitted distribution was selected by visual inspection, clinical plausibility, and Akaike and Bayesian information criterion tests. Direct costs were also considered.

Results

Pembrolizumab provided incremental gains of 1.23, 0.35, and 1.10 QALYs when compared with platinum-based chemotherapy for scenarios one, two, and three, respectively. The subgroup with the best incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was pembrolizumab monotherapy for at least 50 percent PD-1 (BRL201.366 [USD41,041] per QALY gained), followed by pembrolizumab with chemotherapy for one to 49 percent PD-L1 (BRL267.216 [USD54,463] per QALY gained). When assessed for all PD-L1 positive patients, the ICUR reached BRL571.425 (USD116,465), which was 4.5 times the cost-effectiveness threshold. Sensitivity analysis showed that pembrolizumab must cost a maximum of BRL4.761 (USD970) per vial to be cost effective for the SUS, which is a 40.7 percent reduction in the base case price.

Conclusions

Evidence shows that pembrolizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy is more effective than platinum-based chemotherapy for treating patients with NSCLC, especially those with a high expression of PD-L1. However, price reduction is essential for pembrolizumab to be cost effective for treating these patients in the SUS.

Type
Poster Presentations (online)
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press