Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T17:04:03.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PD204 Comparison Of Reimbursement Systems In France Denmark, Norway, And The United Kingdom - Possibilities Of Implementation In Poland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2025

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Reimbursement schemes should be regularly updated to maintain a trade-off between costs for the system and access to medicines. The aim of this study was to review reimbursement systems in several European countries in terms of solutions that could have a positive impact on the health technology assessment (HTA) and reimbursement processes in Poland (e.g., increasing patient access to medicines while maintaining payers’ spending).

Methods

Secondary publications and the websites of key institutions responsible for drug policy (the Ministry of Health, HTA agencies, and payers) in selected European countries were searched to find unique solutions that could have a positive impact on drug policies in Poland. The keywords used were “drug reimbursement” and “HTA”. A more specific search was conducted as needed.

Results

The following solutions considered worthy of further consideration:

  • central organization of tenders for hospital drugs and conducting price negotiations with regional financial responsibility;

  • determining the maximum annual copayment per patient for reimbursed drugs;

  • complementary private health insurance that reduces patient copayments;

  • creating a separate path for hybrid drugs in the HTA and pricing processes;

  • increasing the number of consultations with the market authorization holder, clinical experts, and the public during drug evaluation; and

  • not accounting for the costs of lost productivity during HTA due to the discrimination of seniors and children.

Conclusions

Minor changes in the HTA process, such as increasing the role of consultations, as well as major systemic changes (e.g., introducing complementary private insurance, creating a separate path for hybrid drugs, and introducing a maximum annual copayment for reimbursed drugs) could improve patients’ access to drugs. Implementing these solutions requires significant adaptation of the local legal framework.

Type
Poster Presentations (online)
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press