Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:30:50.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organizational and patient-related assessments in HTAs: State of the art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2009

Anne Lee ,
Line Sinding Skött  and
Helle Ploug Hansen
Anne Lee
Affiliation:
University of Southern Denmark, Odense
Line Sinding Skött
Affiliation:
University of Southern Denmark, Odense
Helle Ploug Hansen
Affiliation:
University of Southern Denmark, Odense
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: The use and implementation of health technologies do influence and are influenced by organizational structures and processes as well as patient's experiences and actions. The objective of this study is to discuss the content and managing of organizational and patient-related assessments in HTAs.

Methods: Quantitative and qualitative analysis were performed based on a review of organizational and patient-related assessments included in a random sample of fifty HTA reports. The reports were identified from INAHTA members’ Web sites where homepages of HTA agencies where searched for full HTA reports, published in English or Scandinavian languages.

Results: HTA reports including organizational assessments mainly comprised issues related to process and structure, while issues such as control and evaluation of the technology were included less often. Cultural and environmental issues were included in a little over half of the reports. Reports including patient-related assessments mainly comprised psychological issues. Patients’ perceptions of the technology's effect on their health, patient-information, and social and ethical issues were included less often. Few reports included implications for the patient's significant others. There was considerable variation in how comprehensive the issues were managed as there was in the methodological transparency of the HTA reports.

Conclusions: There is room for improvement in the assessments of organizational and patient-related issues. Absence of a description of the considerations made when determining the content and methods of the assessments limits the usefulness of an HTA. The reader is left uncertain of the relevance and validity of the organizational and patient-related assessments.

Keywords

Health technology assessmentMethodologyOrganizationPatient
Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , October 2009 , pp. 530 - 536
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Banta, HD, Luce, B. Health care technology and its assessment. An international perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Draborg, E, Gyrd-Hansen, D, Poulsen, PB, Hørder, M. International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:89–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Fulop, N, Allen, P, Clarke, A, Black, N. From health technology assessment to research on the organisation and delivery of health services: addressing the balance. Health Policy. 2002;63:155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. García-Alrés, A, Ondategui-Parra, S, Neumann, PJ. Cross-national comparison of technology assessment processes. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:300–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Granados, A, Jonsson, E, Banta, HD, et al. EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup Report on Dissemination and Impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:220–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Hansen, HP. The patient. In: Kristensen, FB, Sigmund, H, eds. Health technology assessment handbook. Copenhagen: Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment, National Board of Health; 2007.Google Scholar
7. Johri, M, Lehoux, P. The great escape? Prospects for regulating assess to technology through health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19:179–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Kristensen, FB, Sigmund, H, eds. Health technology assessment handbook. Copenhagen: Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment, National Board of Health; 2007.Google Scholar
9. Lee, A, Sinding, LS. A review of organisational and patient-related assessments in HTAs. Copenhagen: INAHTA members of the National Board of Health, Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment; 2007.Google Scholar
10. Lehoux, P, Blume, S. Technology assessment and the sociopolitics of health technologies. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000;25:1084–1120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Lehoux, P, Tailliez, S, Denis, J-L, Hivon, M. Redefining health technology assessment in Canada: Diversification of products and contextualisation of findings. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Liberati, A, Sheldon, TA, Banta, D. EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup report on methodology. Methodological guidance for the conduct of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:186–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Perry, S, Gardner, E, Thamer, M. The status of health technology assessment worldwide. Results of an international survey. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:81–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Poulsen, PB. Health technology assessment and diffusion of health technology. Odense, Denmark: Odense University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
15. Velasco, M, Perleth, M, Drummond, M, et al. Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18:361–422.Google ScholarPubMed