Patients with hematological malignancies are likely to develop hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) and subsequent infections. Immunoglobulin (Ig) replacement is commonly given to prevent infections, but the total costs and cost effectiveness of its use are unknown.

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to assess evidence on the costs and cost effectiveness of Ig replacement, administered intravenously (IVIg) or subcutaneously (SCIg), in adult patients with hematological malignancies. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022321908).

Six studies were included out of a total of 3,612 citations. A narrative synthesis was conducted because of the high level of heterogeneity across the included studies. Two economic evaluations were identified: one cost-utility analysis (CUA) of IVIg versus no Ig and one comparing IVIg with SCIg. The quality of the evidence was low, with most studies having small patient numbers and a high risk of bias. Compared with no treatment, Ig replacement reduced the hospitalization rate in patients with hematological malignancies.

One study reported no change in hospitalization rates following a program to reduce IVIg use, and an observational study comparing IVIg with SCIg found more hospitalizations with SCIg but lower total costs per patient. The CUA comparing IVIg with no IVIg suggested that IVIg treatment was not cost effective, but this study was published in 1991 and had significant limitations. The other CUA found that home-based SCIg was more cost effective than IVIg, but model inputs were derived from unpublished data in a very small patient cohort with HGG and different malignancies.

Our review highlights key gaps in the literature. The cost effectiveness of Ig replacement in patients with hematological malignancies is still very uncertain. Despite the increasing use of Ig replacement there are limited data regarding its direct and indirect costs, and its optimal use and implications for healthcare resources remain unclear. Given the paucity of data on the cost and cost effectiveness of Ig treatment in this population, further health economic research is warranted.