Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:43:06.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

OP61 Cost-Utility Analyses Of Biologics For Refractory Ulcerative Colitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
INTRODUCTION:

Although many biologics (Bs) have been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC) in patients who have responded inadequately to conventional therapy, the selection of Bs is controversial due to the lack of head-to-head trials. Indirect economic comparisons of these costly drugs are available from National Healthcare perspectives that are not the Italian ones. Therefore, the objective is to evaluate cost-utility of Bs for the treatment of refractory moderate-to-severe UC both in Italy and in the Lombardy Region.

METHODS:

A Markov model (considering three transition states: remission, clinical response, relapse) was constructed using the software R 3.3.1 markovchain-package to evaluate incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR) of adalimumab (ADA), infliximab (IFX), infliximab biosimilar (IFX-B), golimumab (GOL) and vedolizumab (VED) treatments of patients over a 10-year time horizon from the perspective of the Italian (N) and Lombardy Region (R) healthcare system. Clinical parameters were derived from clinical trials. Costs (actualized by – 1.5 percent) were obtained from the National database and Regional public tender. Utility was expressed as QALY (Quality-Adjusted Life Years).

RESULTS:

Costs per treatment were different from a N and R perspective (ADA -55 percent; IFX -16.7 percent; IFX-B -29.6 percent; GOL -9.6 percent; VED -10 percent). Direct healthcare costs (treatment cost, visits, laboratory tests, hospital admissions) were calculated over 10 years of treatment per patient: ADA (N: EUR114,227, R: EUR68,314, -40.2 percent), IFX (N: EUR130,595, R: EUR103,081, -21 percent), IFX-B (N: EUR110,438, R: EUR78,852, -28.6 percent), GOL (N: EUR118,602, R: EUR96,922, -18.3 percent), VED (N: EUR113,852, R: EUR102,932, -9.6 percent) with associated QALY respectively of 6.68, 6.66, 6.66, 6.70, 7.02. From a N perspective, IFX-B was dominating compared to all other treatments. The ICUR of VED/IFX-B was EUR9,483 for 10 years (willingness to pay EUR948/QALY). From a R perspective, ADA was dominating compared to all other treatments. The ICUR of VED/ADA was EUR101,818 for 10 years (Willingness to Pay, WTP EUR10,182/QALY).

CONCLUSIONS:

National and Regional cost-utility analyses produced different results. As Regional price discounts can occur, local analysis is needed to estimate the economic impact of therapies to ensure optimal choice.

Type
Oral Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018