Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:17:57.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

OP39 Evaluation Of Discharge Planning And Transitional Care For The Elderly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2019

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

According to our local data, elderly patients accounted for 14 percent of the population yet, represent 58 percent of hospitalization and, they are more likely to return after discharge. These patients are more likely to return to the hospital following discharge. In order to meet ministerial target for length of stay of patient on a stretcher, the UETMIS-SS was requested to evaluate interventions aiming to improve the fluidity of patient trajectories in the acute care services. The objective of this health technology assessment is to evaluate the effectiveness of discharge planning and transitional care interventions aiming at reducing the readmission rate of the elderly.

Methods:

An umbrella review was conducted following the PRISMA statement to summarize the scientific evidence. The search was conducted in five databases along with the grey literature search. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, the quality assessment and the data extraction. To better illustrate the activities and the healthcare professionals (HCP) involved in the interventions, an analytical framework was developed. Results were summarized in a narrative synthesis. The contextual and experiential data were collected through interviews with HCP and directorates from different settings. The level of evidence was and a committee was then held to elaborate the recommendations.

Results:

In the nine systematic reviews included in the narrative synthesis, three models were identified: Post-discharge planning and follow-up by the same HCP was established to be effective in reducing the readmission rate. Discharge planning interventions with follow-up by non-specific HCP have been shown to be promising, while discharge planning without follow-up after the hospital discharge has shown to be ineffective in reducing the readmission rate.

Conclusions:

An individualized discharge plan, coordination of services and follow-up performed by the same HCP is established to be effective in reducing readmission rate.

Type
Oral Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018