Few studies have explored the relationship between different venous access devices and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients with breast cancer in China. This study aimed to evaluate the HRQoL of patients with breast cancer in China who underwent different venous access devices and to estimate the association between type of venous access device and HRQoL.

A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in three tertiary hospitals from three major geographical regions in China. The final sample consisted of 472 patients aged from 18 to 78 years. The HRQoL was measured with the EQ-5D-5L scale and the EuroQoL Group visual analog scale. The venous access devices were divided into totally implantable venous access devices (TIVAD), peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC), and other devices. The multivariate regression analyses were used to explore the association between type of venous access device and HRQoL.

Of 472 participants, 352 (75%) used the TIVAD device, 89 (19%) used the PICC device, and 31 (7%) used other devices. The TIVAD group had the highest EQ-5D-5L values (mean 0.89, standard deviation [SD] 0.178), while the PICC group had the lowest values (mean 0.85, SD 0.239). The EQ-5D-5L values for the other venous access device group was in between (mean 0.88, SD 0.127). However, the multivariate analysis indicated that the VAS and EQ-5D-5L scale dimension scores among patients were not significantly different (P>0.05) for the various central venous access devices.

This study demonstrates a non-significant association between the type of venous access device used and the HRQoL of patients with breast cancer in China. Although patients with a TIVAD experienced more pain during device insertion and access for chemotherapy, the negative effect on HRQoL scores was smaller than for PICCs.