Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:34:45.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the (Near) Equivalence of Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Charles E. Phelps  and
Alvin I. Mushlin
Charles E. Phelps
Affiliation:
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry
Alvin I. Mushlin
Affiliation:
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many people believe that cost-effectiveness (CE) and cost-benefit (CB) analyses require different assumptions. However, when CE analysis supports decisions to use medical resources, it makes the same assumptions that CB analysis requires. They are mathematically equivalent. Differences between CE and CB hinge more on reporting style than on fundamental assumptions.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , Winter 1991 , pp. 12 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Eddy, D. M.Screening for cancer. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
2.Eddy, D. M., Hasselblad, V., McGivney, W., & Hendee, W.The value of mammography screening in women under age 50 years. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1988, 259, 1512–CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Harberger, A. C.Three basic postulates for applied welfare economics: An interpretive essay. Journal of Economic Literature, 1971, 9, 785–97.Google Scholar
4.Neuhauser, D., & Lewicki, A. M.What can we learn from the 6th stool guaiac? New England Journal of Medicine, 1975, 293, 226–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Rawls, J.Justice as fairness: Political, not metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1985, 14, 223–50.Google Scholar
6.Torrance, G. W.Measurement of health status utilities for economic appraisal: A review. Journal of Health Economics, 1986, 5, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Warner, K., & Luce, B.Cost benefit and cost effectiveness analysis in health care: Principles, practice, and potential. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1982.Google Scholar
8.Weinstein, M. C., Fineberg, H. V., et al. , Clinical decision analysis, Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1980.Google Scholar
9.Weinstein, M. C., & Stason, W. B.Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. New England Journal of Medicine, 1977, 296, 716–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed