Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:02:19.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labor and Health Status in Economic Evaluation of Health Care: The Health and Labor Questionnaire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Leona Van Roijen ,
Marie-Louise Essink-bot ,
Marc A. Koopmanschap ,
Gouke Bonsel  and
Frans F. H. Rutten
Leona Van Roijen
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Marie-Louise Essink-bot
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Marc A. Koopmanschap
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Gouke Bonsel
Affiliation:
Academic Medical CentreAmsterdam
Frans F. H. Rutten
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A health care program may influence both costs and health effects. We developed the Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ), which consists of four modules, to collect data on absence from work, reduced productivity, unpaid labor production, and labor-related problems. We applied the HLQ in several studies, and the results are encouraging.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , Summer 1996 , pp. 405 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Central Bureau for Statistics (CBS) Data from Time Use Survey. 1988.Google Scholar
2.Central Bureau for Statistics (CBS). Data on absence from work. 1993.Google Scholar
3.Central Planning Bureau (CPB). Uncertainties on labour time reduction in the medium term (in Dutch). Working document 14. Den Haag: CPB, 1987.Google Scholar
4.Cull, R. E., Wells, N. E. J., & Miocevich, M. L.The economic cost of migraine. British Journal of Medical Economy, 1993, 2, 103–15.Google Scholar
5.Ferber, M. A., & Birnhaum, B. G.The new home economics: Retrospects and prospects. Journal of Consumer Research, 1977, 4, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Gronau, R.Home production: A forgotten industry. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1980, 62, 408–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Harwryslyshyn, O.Toward a definition of non-market activities. Review of Income and Wealth, 1977, 23, 79–96.Google Scholar
8.Homan, M. E.The allocation of time and money in one-earner and two-earner families; An economic analysis. Ablasserdam: Kanters Press, 1988.Google Scholar
9.Juster, F. T., & Stafford, F. P.The allocation of time: Empirical findings, behavioral models and problems of measurement. Journal of Economic Literature, 1991, 4471–522.Google Scholar
10.Koning, J., & Tuyl, F. A. W. M.The relation between labour time, production and employment (in Dutch), Rotterdam; Netherlands Economic Institute, 1984.Google Scholar
11.Koopmanschap, M. A., & Rutten, F. F. H.Indirect costs in economic studies, PharmacoEconomics, 1993, 4, 406.Google Scholar
12.Koopmanschap, M. A., Rutten, F. F. H., van Ineveld, B. M., & van Roijen, L.The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. Journal of Health Economics, in press.Google Scholar
13.Leving, L. A., & Jönsson, B.Costs-effectiveness of thrombolysis: A randomized study of intravenous rt-PA in suspected myocardial infarction. European Heart Journal, 1992; 13, 2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Olesen, J.Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia, an International Journal of Headache, 1988, 8 (Suppl. 7), 408.Google Scholar
15.Osterhaus, J. T., Gutterman, D. L., & Plachetka, J. R. Health care resource and lost labor costs of migraine headache in the US. PharmacoEconomics, 1992, 67–76.Google Scholar
16.Quah, E.Persistent problem in measuring household production: Definition, quantifying, joint activities and valuation issues are solvable. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1986, 45, 235–45.Google Scholar
17.Quah, E.Valuing family household production: A contingent evaluation approach. Applied Economics, 1987, 19, 875–89.Google Scholar
18.van Roijen, L., Essink-Bot, M. L., Rutten, F. F. H., & Koopmanschap, M. A.Societal perspective on the burden of migraine, PharmacoEconomics 1995, 7, 170–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.van Roijen, L., & Wunderink, S. R.The distribution of household production and leisure (in Dutch). Economical Statistical Messages, 1994, 78, 365–68.Google Scholar
20.Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D.The MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). I: Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 1992, 30, 247–483.Google Scholar