Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:27:42.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Evolution of Laparoscopic Surgery in Routine Health Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Naarilla Hirsch  and
David Hailey
Naarilla Hirsch
Affiliation:
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
David Hailey
Affiliation:
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now widely used, diffusion of other laparoscopic surgical methods has been more modest. Uptake of most laparoscopic methods has been influenced by considerations of effectiveness compared with open surgery, competing minimally invasive therapies, and the inconvenience and cost of technical change.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , Fall 1995 , pp. 779 - 785
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Amid, P. K., Shulman, A. G., & Lichtenstein, I. L.A critical comparison of laparoscopic hernia repair with Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Medical Journal of Australia, 1994 161, 239–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1.Banta, H. D.Cost effectiveness often selected applications in minimally invasive therapy. Health Policy, 1993, 23, 135–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Banta, H. D., & Vondeling, H.Diffusion of minimally invasive therapy in Europe. Health Policy, 1993, 23, 125–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Catts, P. F., Aroney, M., & Indyk, J. S.Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. Medical Journal of Australia, 1994, 161, 243–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Cook, J., Richardson, J., & Street, A.A cost utility analysis of treatment options for gallstone disease: Methodological issues and results. Health Economics, 1994, 3, 157–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Cushieri, A.Minimal access surgery and the future of interventional laparoscopy. American Journal of Surgery, 1991, 161, 404–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Fleming, J. S.Laparoscopically directed appendicectomy: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985, 25, 238–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Fletcher, D. R.Changes in the practice of biliary surgery and ERCP during the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to Australia: Their possible significance. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 1994, 64, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Hardy, K. J., Miller, H., Fletcher, D. R., et al. An evaluation of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. Medical Journal of Australia, 1994, 160, 58–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Hirsch, N. A.Cost and diffusion of minimally invasive techniques in gynaecology. Minimally Invasive Therapy, 1994, 3, 343–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Hirsch, N. A.Minimal access surgery: An update. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 1994.Google Scholar
12.Hirsch, N. A.Technologies for the treatment of menorrhagia and uterine myomas. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 1993.Google Scholar
13.Hugh, T. B.Laparoscopic hernia repair. Medical Journal of Australia, 1993, 159, 151–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Jones, I. S. C., & Lapsley, H. M.Quality assurance applied to laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: A pilot study. Journal of Quality in Clinical Practice, 1994, 14, 121–29.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Marshall, D., Hailey, D., Hirsch, N., et al. The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Canada and Australia. Canberra & Ottawa: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment, 06 1994.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Mclntosh, J. H., Byth, K., Tsang, N., et al. Trends in peptic ulcer mortality in Sydney from 1971 to 1987. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 1993, 16, 346–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Paget, G. W.Laparoscopic inguinal hernia. Medical Journal of Australia, 1994, 161, 249–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Polglase, A. L., & McMurrick, P. J.Laparoscopic or open repair of inguinal hernias? Medical Journal of Australia, 1994, 161, 238–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Richardson, J., Smith, N., Milthorpe, F., & Ryan, J.The diffusion of technology in Australia: Report of a survey. Melbourne: National Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Technical Report No. 1, 1993.Google Scholar
20.Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Policy statement: New technology and surgical practice. RACS Bulletin, 11 1993.Google Scholar
21.Sculpher, M.A snip at the price? A review of the economics of minimal access surgery. Uxbridge: Brunei University, 10 1993.Google Scholar
22.Steiner, C. A., Bass, E. B., Talamini, M. A., et al. Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparosocopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. New England Journal of Medicine, 1994, 330, 403–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Wexner, S. D., Cohen, S. M., Johansen, O. B., et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A prospective assessment and current perspective. British Journal of Surgery, 1993, 80, 1602–05.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Wickham, J. E. A.An introduction to minimally invasive therapy. Health Policy, 1993, 23, 7–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed