Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:46:42.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of initial combination therapy with interferon/peginterferon plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C in Germany: A health technology assessment commissioned by the German Federal Ministry of Health and Social Security

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2005

Uwe Siebert  and
Gaby Sroczynski
Uwe Siebert
Affiliation:
Ludwig-Maximilians-University and Harvard Medical School
Gaby Sroczynski
Affiliation:
Ludwig-Maximilians-University and Harvard Medical School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this health technology assessment (HTA), commissioned by the German Federal Ministry of Health and Social Security, was to systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of antiviral treatment (AVT) with interferon (INF) or peginterferon (PegIFN) in combination with ribavirin (RBV) in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and to apply these data in the context of the German health-care system.

Methods: We performed a systematic literature search on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of AVT and summarized results using meta-analysis and evidence tables. We applied the German Hepatitis C Model (GEHMO), a decision-analytic Markov model, to determine long-term clinical effectiveness, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of the examined treatment strategies. Model parameters were derived from German databases, published international randomized clinical trials (RCT), and a Cochrane Review.

Results: Overall, nine RCTs, two HTA reports, one Cochrane review, two meta-analyses, and seven economic evaluations met the inclusion criteria. These studies indicate that PegIFN+RBV achieved the highest sustained virological response rates (SVR) (54–61 percent), followed by IFN+RBV (38–54 percent) and IFN monotherapy (11–21 percent). Based on our meta-analysis, PegIFN+RBV reduced cases without SVR by 17 percent compared with INF+RBV. International cost-effectiveness studies indicate that INF+RBV is cost-effective when compared with INF monotherapy. For PegIFN+RBV, our decision analysis yielded an ICER of €9,800 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.

Conclusions: This HTA suggests that initial combination therapy prolongs life, improves quality of life, and is cost-effective in patients with CHC. Peginterferon plus ribavirin is the most effective and efficient treatment among the examined options. However, because not all chronic hepatitis C patients will develop progressive liver disease, a thorough assessment of the eligibility and appropriateness of treatment with combination therapy must be performed in each individual patient.

Keywords

Chronic hepatitis CAntiviral therapyHealth technology assessmentDecision analysis
Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 55 - 65
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter H, Seeff L. 2000 Recovery, persistence, and sequelae in hepatitis C virus infection: A perspective on long-term outcome. Semin Liver Dis. 20: 17– 35.Google Scholar
Alter M, Kruskon-Moran D, Nainan O, et al. 1999 The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States 1988 through 1994. N Engl J Med. 341: 556– 562.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1999 Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation—Revidierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsensus. Hannoveraner Konsensus Gruppe. Gesundheitsökonomie Qualitätsmanagement. 4: A62– A65.
Anonymous. 1999 EASL International Consensus Conference on Hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 30: 956– 961.
Anonymous. 2002. Rote Liste: Arzneimittelverzeichnis für Deutschland. Available at: http://www.rote-liste.de.
Baltussen R, Ament A, Leidl R. 1996 Making cost assessments based on RCTs more useful to decision-makers. Health Policy. 37: 163– 183.Google Scholar
Barbaro G, Di Lorenzo G, Soldini M, et al. 2000 Evaluation of long-term efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in combination in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C: An Italian multicenter experience. Ribavirin-Interferon in Chronic Hepatitis Italian Group Investigators. J Hepatol. 33: 448– 455.Google Scholar
Bennett WG, Inoue Y, Beck JR, et al. 1997 Estimates of the cost-effectiveness of a single course of interferon-alpha 2b in patients with histologically mild chronic hepatitis C. Ann Intern Med. 127: 855– 865.Google Scholar
Buti M, Casado M, Fosbrook L, Wong JB, Esteban R. Cost-effectiveness of combination therapy for naive patients with chronic hepatitis C J Hepatol. 2000; 33: 651– 658.Google Scholar
Chemello L, Cavalletto L, Bernardinello E, et al. 1995 The effect of interferon alfa and ribavirin combination therapy in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 23 (Suppl 2): 8– 12.Google Scholar
Cochrane Collaboration. 2002. Cochrane Collaboration open learning material for reviewers. Available at: http://www.cochrane-net.(org)/org/(HTML)/HTML11-4.htm.
Desmet VJ, Gerber M, Hoofnagle JH, Manns M, Scheuer PJ. 1994 Classification of chronic hepatitis: Diagnosis, grading, and staging. Hepatology. 19: 1513– 1520.Google Scholar
Di Bisceglie A, Goodman Z, Ishak K, et al. 1991 Long-term clinical and histopathological follow-up of chronic posttransfusion hepatitis. Hepatology. 14: 969– 974.Google Scholar
Dore G, Freeman A, Law M, Kaldor JM. 2002 Is severe liver disease a common outcome for people with chronic hepatitis C? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 17: 423– 430.Google Scholar
Drummond M, Bloom BS, Carrin G, et al. 1992 Issues in the cross-national assessment of health technology. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 8: 671– 682.Google Scholar
Drummond MF, O'Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. 1997. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. New York: Oxford University Press;
Freeman A, Dore G, Law M, et al. 2001 Estimating progression to cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology. 34: 809– 816.Google Scholar
Fried M, Shiffman M, Reddy R, et al. 2002 Peginterferon Alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med. 347: 975– 982.Google Scholar
Gebo K, Jenckes M, Chander G, et al. 2002. Management of hepatitis C. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment. No. 60 (Prepared by the John Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No 290-97-0006). AHRQ Publication No. 02-E030. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality;
Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. 1996. Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press;
Greiner W. 1999. Ökonomische Evaluation von Gesundheitsleistungen: Fragestellungen, Methoden und Grenzen dargestellt am Beispiel der Transplantationsmedizin. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlags-Gesellschaft;
Haycox A, Dubois D, Butterworth M. 1998 Customising an international disease management model to the needs of individual countries. Pharmacoeconomics 14 (Suppl 2): 39– 56.Google Scholar
Hopf U, Moller B, Kuther D, et al. 1990 Long-term follow-up of posttransfusion and sporadic chronic hepatitis non-A, non-B and frequency of circulating antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV). J Hepatol. 10: 69– 76.Google Scholar
Kjaergard L, Krogsgaard K, Gluud C. 2001 Interferon alfa with or without ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C: Systematic review of randomised trials. BMJ. 323: 1151– 1155.Google Scholar
Kjaergard L, Krogsgaard K, Gluud C. Ribavirin with or without alpha interferon versus no intervention, placebo or alpha interferon for chronic hepatitis C. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002 (2): CD002234.Google Scholar
Knodell RG, Ishak KG, Black WC, et al. 1981 Formulation and application of a numerical scoring system for assessing histological activity in asymptomatic chronic active hepatitis. Hepatology. 1: 431– 435.Google Scholar
Koretz R, Abbey H, Coleman E, Gitnick G. 1993 Non-A, non-B post-transfusion hepatitis. Looking back in the second decade. Ann Intern Med. 119: 110– 115.Google Scholar
Lai MY, Kao JH, Yang PM, et al. 1996 Long-term efficacy of ribavirin plus interferon alfa in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 111: 1307– 1312.Google Scholar
Liang TJ, Rehermann B, Seeff LB, Hoofnagle JH. 2000 Pathogenesis, natural history, treatment, and prevention of hepatitis C. Ann Intern Med. 132: 296– 305.Google Scholar
Lühmann D, Siebert U, Droste S, von der Leyen U, Perleth M. Konzeption zur Anpassung und Erstellung von Technologiebewertungen in der Deutschen Arbeitsgruppe Verfahrensbewertung in der Medizin. Toolkit. Informationsmaterial für Verfasser von HTA-Berichten. 1999.
Mangia A, Villani MR, Minerva N, et al. 2001 Efficacy of 5 MU of interferon in combination with ribavirin for naive patients with chronic hepatitis C virus: A randomized controlled trial. J. Hepatol. 34: 441– 446.Google Scholar
Manns M, McHutchison J, Gordon S, et al. 2001 Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: A randomised trial. Lancet. 358: 958– 965.Google Scholar
Marcellin P, Asselah T, Boyer N. 2002 Fibrosis and disease progression in hepatitis C. Hepatology. 36 (Suppl): S47– S56.Google Scholar
Mattsson L. 1993 Outcome of acute symptomatic non-A, non-B hepatitis: A 13-year follow-up study of hepatitis C virus markers. Liver. 13: 274– 278.Google Scholar
McHutchison J, Gordon S, Schiff E, et al. 1998 Interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C. Hepatitis Interventional Therapy Group. N Engl J Med. 339: 1485– 1492.Google Scholar
McHutchison JG, Poynard T. 1999 Combination therapy with interferon plus ribavirin for the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Semin Liver Dis. 19 (Suppl 1): 57– 65.Google Scholar
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2000. OECD Health Data 2003: A comparative analysis of 30 countries. Paris: OECD/CREDES;
Poynard T, Marcellin P, Lee S, et al. 1998 Randomised trial of interferon alpha2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks or for 24 weeks versus interferon alpha2b plus placebo for 48 weeks for treatment of chronic infection with hepatitis C virus. International Hepatitis Interventional Therapy Group (IHIT). Lancet. 352: 1426– 1432.Google Scholar
Reichard O, Norkrans G, Fryden A, et al. 1998 Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of interferon alpha-2b with and without ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C. The Swedish Study Group. Lancet. 351: 83– 87.Google Scholar
Robert Koch Institut. 2002 Zur Situation bei wichtigen Infektionskrankheiten in Deutschland: Virushepatitis B und C bis zum Jahr 2001. Epidemiol Bull. 44: 360– 376.
Sagmeister M, Wong J, Mullhaupt B, Renner E. 2001 A pragmatic and cost-effective strategy of a combination therapy of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 13: 483– 438.Google Scholar
Schreier E, Höhne M. 2001 Hepatitis C—Epidemiologie und Prävention. Bundesgesundheitsblatt. 44: 554– 561.Google Scholar
Sennfält K, Reichard O, Hultkrantz R, Wong J, Jonsson D. 2001 Cost-effectiveness of interferon alfa-2b with and without ribavirin as therapy for chronic hepatitis C in Sweden. Scand J Gastroenterol. 36: 870– 876.Google Scholar
Shepherd J, Waugh N, Hewitson P. 2000 Combination therapy (interferon alfa and ribavirin) in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: A rapid and systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 4: 1– 67.Google Scholar
Siebert U, Behrend C, Mühlberger N, et al. 1999: [Development of a Criteria Catalogue for the Description and Assessment of Economic Evaluations in Germany]. In: Leidl R, vd Schulenburg JM, Wasem J, eds. Ansätze und Methoden der ökonomischen Evaluation—eine internationale Perspektive. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag; 156– 170.
Siebert U, Greiner W, Ravens-Sieberer U, et al. 2003 Preference-based quality-of-life values in patients with chronic hepatitis C: Results from the German hepatitis C quality-of-life study. Abstract. J Hepatol. 38 (Suppl 2): 596.Google Scholar
Siebert U, Mühlberger N, Behrend C, Wasem J. 1999. Technology assessment for health care: A tool for explicitly evaluating economic studies. GMDS '99. Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie. München: MMV Medizin;
Siebert U, Ravens-Sieberer U, Greiner W, et al. 2001 Patient-based health-related quality of life in different health stages of chronic hepatitis C [Abstract]. Hepatology. 34: 222A.Google Scholar
Siebert U, Sroczynski G, on behalf of the German Hepatitis C Model (GEHMO) Group and the HTA Expert Panel on Hepatitis C. 2003. Antivirale Therapie bei Patienten mit chronischer Hepatitis C in Deutschland. Medizinische und ökonomische Evaluation der initialen Kombinationstherapie mit Interferon/Peginterferon und Ribavirin. Health Technology Assessment Vol. 8 (Series of the German Agency for Health Technology Assessment at the German Institute for Medical Documentation and Information commissioned by the Federal Ministry of Health and Social Security). Köln: DIMDI Available at: http://www.dimdi.de.
Statistisches Bundesamt. 2000. Preisindex für Arzt-, Krankenhausund sonstige Dienstleistungen für die Gesundheitspflege.
Stein K, Rosenberg W, Wong J. 2002 Cost effectiveness of combination therapy for hepatitis C: A decision analytic model. Gut. 50: 253– 258.Google Scholar
Tremolada F, Casarin C, Alberti A, et al. 1992 Long-term follow-up of non-A, non-B (type C) post-transfusion hepatitis. J Hepatol. 16: 273– 281.Google Scholar
Weinstein MC. 1999 High-priced technology can be good value for money. Ann Intern Med. 130: 857– 858.Google Scholar
Welte R, Leidl R. Übertragung der Ergebnisse ökonomischer Evaluationsstudien aus dem Ausland auf Deutschland: Probleme und Lösungsansätze. In: Leidl R, vd Schulenburg JM, Wasem J, eds. Ansätze und Methoden der ökonomischen Evaluation—eine internationale Perspektive. Baden-Baden: Nomos; 1999: 171– 202.
WHO. 1999 Global Surveillance and control of hepatitis C. Report of a WHO Consultation organized in collaboration with the Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board, Antwerp, Belgium. J Viral Hepat. 6: 35– 47.
Willke RJ, Glick HA, Polsky D, Schulman K. 1998 Estimating country-specific cost-effectiveness from multinational clinical trials. Health Econ. 7: 481– 493.Google Scholar
Wong J, Davis G, Pauker S, for the International Hepatitis Interventional Therapy Group. 1998 Cost-effectiveness of ribavirin/interferon alfa-2b after interferon relapse in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 28 (Suppl 4, Pt 2): 591A.Google Scholar
Wong J, Poynard T, Ling M, Albrecht J, Pauker S. 2000 Cost-effectiveness of 24 or 48 weeks of interferon alpha-2b alone or with ribavirin as initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C. International Hepatitis Interventional Therapy Group. Am J Gastroenterol. 95: 1524– 1530.Google Scholar
Wong JB, Sonnenberg FA, Salem DN, Pauker SG. 1990 Myocardial revascularization for chronic stable angina. Analysis of the role of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty based on data available in 1989. Ann Intern Med. 113: 852– 871.Google Scholar
Younossi Z, Singer M, McHutchison J, Shermock K. 1999 Cost effectiveness of interferon alpha2b combined with ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 30: 1318– 1324.Google Scholar