Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:39:48.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diffusion of In-Vitro Fertilization in the Netherlands and England: An Exploratory Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Ardine de Wit  and
David Banta
Ardine de Wit
Affiliation:
University of Limburg
David Banta
Affiliation:
University of Limburg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In-vitro fertilization (IVF) is a relatively recent approach to overcoming human fertility problems. This study explored factors in the diffusion of IVF in England and in the Netherlands. Many factors were common to the two countries. Governments in both countries have been passive, apparently wishing to avoid entering a controversial field. Technology assessment has played little part in the diffusion process in these two countries.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , Fall 1991 , pp. 574 - 584
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Behrman, S. J., & Kistner, R. W.Progress in infertility. Boston, MA: Little, Braun, and Company, 1975.Google Scholar
2. Besluit tijdelijke regeling IVF. Staatscourant, 1985, nr. 141.Google Scholar
3.British Medical Association. Interim report on human in vitro fertilisation and embryo replacement and transfer. British Medical Journal, 1984, 286, 1594–95.Google Scholar
4.Breeders, C. J.Medische technologie, ethiek en beleid — Op zoek naar een moreel verant-woord besluitvormingsproces op macro-niveau: de beslisboom als hulpmiddel. Medisch Contact, 1989, 44, 45–49.Google Scholar
5.Buttram, V. C., & Reiter, R. C.Surgical treatment of the infertile female. Baltimore, MD/London: Williams and Wilkins, 1985.Google Scholar
6.College voor Ziekenhuisvoorzieningen. Advies inzake in vitro fertilisatie. Utrecht, the Netherlands: College voor Ziekenhuisvoorzieningen, 1985.Google Scholar
7.Department of Health and Social Security. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1984.Google Scholar
8.Gezondheidsraad, . Interimadvies inzake in vitro fertilisatie. ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands: Gezondheidsraad, 1984.Google Scholar
9.Gezondheidsraad. Advies inzake kunstmatige voortplanting: in het bijzonder IVF, kunstmatige inseminatie met donorzaad en draagmoederschap. ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands: Gezondheidsraad, 1986.Google Scholar
10.Haan, G.Effects and costs of in-vitro fertilization. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1991, 7, 585–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Haan, G., Steen, R. van, & Rutten, F.Evaluatie van in vitro fertilisatie. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Limburg, 1989.Google Scholar
12.Hull, M. G. R., Glazener, C. M. A., Kelly, N. J., et al. Population study of causes, treatment, and outcome of infertility. British Medical Journal, 1985, 291, 1693–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Keller, D. W., Strickler, R. C., & Warren, J. C.Clinical infertility. Norwalk, CT: Appleton, Century, Crofts, 1984.Google Scholar
14.Malestein, A. G. van.In vitro fertilisatie in het ziekenfondspakket! Medisch Contact, 1986, 41, 722–24.Google Scholar
15.McWhinnie, A. M. Test tube babies — The child, the family, and society. In Fishel, S. & Symonds, E. M. (eds.), In vitro fertilisation: Past-present-future. Oxford, U.K.: IRL Press, 1987, 215–27.Google Scholar
16.Medical Research Council. Statement on research related to human fertilisation and embryology. British Medical Journal, 1982, 285, 1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Menning, B. E., Infertility: A guide for childless couple. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
18.Mosher, W. D.Infertility trends among U.S. couples: 1965–1976. Family Planning Perspectives, 1982, 14, 22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Office of Technology Assessment. Infertility: Medical and social choices. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1988.Google Scholar
20.Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Report of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ ethics committee on in vitro fertilisation and embryo replacment or transfer. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 1983.Google Scholar
21.Scheerens, R.In vitro fertilisatie (letter). Medisch Contact, 1985, 40, 1575.Google Scholar
22.Speroff, L., Glass, R. H., & Kase, N. G.Clinical gynaecologic endocrinology and infertility. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1983.Google Scholar
23.Tijmstra, T.In vitro fertilisation and the meaning of anticipated decision regret. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1989, 5, 207–14.Google Scholar
24.Veevers, J. E.The social meanings of parenthood. Psychiatry, 1973, 36, 291–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Voluntary Licensing Authority for Human In Vitro Fertilisation and Embryology. Annual reports. London: Voluntary Licensing Authority, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989.Google Scholar
26.Westmore, A. History. In Wood, C. & Trounson, A. (eds.), Clinical in vitro fertilisation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1984, 1–10.Google Scholar
27.Wit, G. A. de.Diffusion of medical technology—A case study on in vitro fertilisation. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Limburg, 1989.Google Scholar
28.Ziekenfondsrechtspraak, 15 April 1982. Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidsrecht, maart-04 1983, 107–08.Google Scholar