Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:27:29.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Demand as a Driving Force in Medical Innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Peter Lotz
Peter Lotz
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On the basis of two case histories of medical device innovation, two aspects of demand are identified: (a) the prospect of new markets and (b) information about user needs. Conditions for direct interaction between the user and producer in the innovation process are identified. The article concludes with some normative implications for the publicly designed generation of new medical technology.

Type
Special Section: Industry and the Generation of Technology
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , Spring 1993 , pp. 174 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bentzen, O., Ewertsen, H. W., & Salomon, G. (eds.). Danish audiology 1951–1976. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busck, 1976.Google Scholar
2.Comroe, J. H., & Dripps, R. D.Scientific basis for the support of biomedical science. Science, 1976, 192, 105–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Cooper, R.Identifying industrial new product success: Project NewProd. Industrial Marketing Management, 1979, 8, 124–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Dahmén, E.Entrepreneurial activity and the development of Swedish industry, 1919–1939. Stockholm, Sweden: Industriens Utredningsinstitut, 1950.Google Scholar
5.Dahmén, E.“Development blocks” in industrial economics. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 1988, 1, 109–21.Google Scholar
6.Gelijns, A. C. Comparing the development of drugs, devices, and clinical procedures. In Institute of Medicine, Modern methods of clinical investigation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1990, 147–201.Google Scholar
7.Geroski, P. A.Procurement policy as a tool of industrial policy. International Review of Applied Economics, 1990, 4 (06), 132–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Hutton, J., & Hartley, K.The influence of health service procurement policy on research and development in the UK medical capital equipment industry. Research Policy, 1985, 14, 205–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Kay, N. M.The emergent firm. London: Macmillan Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kotler, P.Marketing management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988.Google Scholar
11.Lancaster, K. J.Change and innovation in the technology of consumption. American Economic Review Proceedings, 1966, X (05), 14–23.Google Scholar
12.Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B.First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 1988, 9, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Maxwell, J. H.The iron lung: Halfway technology or necessary step? The Milbank Quarterly, 1986, 64, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Mowery, D. C. & Rosenberg, N. The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies. In Rosenberg, N. (ed.), Inside the black box: Technology and economics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 193–241.Google Scholar
15.Norretranders, T.Videnskabsvurdering. Copenhagen, Denmark: Gyldendal, 1987.Google Scholar
16.OECD. Health care systems in transition. Paris, 1990.Google Scholar
17.Porter, M. E.The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Roberts, E. B.Managing technological innovation in the medical device industry. Research Technology Management, 07-08 1989, 32(4), 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Rothwell, R., Freeman, C, Horsley, A., et al. SAPPHO Updated: Project SAPPHO Phase II. Research Policy, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Scherer, F. M.Innovation and growth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1984.Google Scholar
21.Schmookler, J.Invention and economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Schroder, S. The relation of clinical chemistry to industry. In Jubilaeumsbog. Copenhagen, Denmark: Klinisk-kemisk afdeling CL, Rigshospitalet, 09 1979, 36–400.Google Scholar
23.Shaw, B.The role of the interaction between the manufacturer and the user in the technological innovation process. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Sussex, UK, 04 1986.Google Scholar
24.Teece, D. J.Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy, 1986, 15, 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Teubal, M.Innovation performance, learning, and government policy. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.Google Scholar
26.Teubal, M., Arnon, N., & Trachtenberg, M.Performance in innovation in the Israeli elec tronics industry: A case study of biomedical electronics instrumentation. Research Policy, 1976, 5, 354–79.Google Scholar
27.U.N. International Trade Statistics Yearbook, 1988. New York: United Nations, 1990.Google Scholar
28.von Hippel, E.The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988. Google Scholar