Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:14:57.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Defining capacity building in the context of HTA: a proposal by the HTAi Scientific Development and Capacity Building Committee

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2019

Franz Pichler ,
Wija Oortwijn ,
Alric Ruether Open the ORCID record for Alric Ruether [Opens in a new window]  and
Rebecca Trowman
Franz Pichler*
Affiliation:
Eli Lilly, 112 Wharf, Rd, Melrose Park NSW 2114, Australia
Wija Oortwijn
Affiliation:
Radboud University Medical Centre, The Netherlands
Alric Ruether
Affiliation:
HTAi Scientific Development and Capacity Building committee Chair, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Healthcare (IQWIG), Germany
Rebecca Trowman
Affiliation:
Health Technology Assessment international (HTAi), Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Franz Pichler, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

To develop a definition of “capacity building” relevant to Health Technology Assessment international (HTAi).

Methods

A review of capacity building activities undertaken by HTAi members, members of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA), and regional HTA networks was compared against general literature on capacity building definitions and frameworks. The findings were reviewed by the HTAi Scientific Development and Capacity Building Committee. Furthermore, the Executive Committee and Interest Groups of HTAi provided input on the draft final paper.

Results

The literature demonstrated the need for a definition of capacity building specific to HTA. In the context of HTAi, it was necessary for the definition to cover (i) the broadest range of HTA-related activities, (ii) multiple stakeholders involved in the HTA process, and (iii) the spectrum of activities that compose capacity building. We propose the following definition of HTA capacity building: The process by which individuals and organizations develop or strengthen abilities related to understanding, providing input to, conducting, or utilizing HTA for health policy and decision making, as well as, developing awareness and support in the environment within which HTA is being used.

Conclusion

A definition of HTA-related capacity building that was intended to provide clarity about what this term means to HTAi was developed. As HTA is context-dependent, a need for further work to develop an operationalization “menu” relevant to the specific needs in which HTA is being used was identified.

Keywords

Capacity buildingHealth technology assessmentDefinition
Type
Article Commentary
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , 2019 , pp. 362 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.HTAi website. HTAi 2015-2020 Strategic Direction. Available at: https://htai.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/StratPlan_2016_10_04-1.pdf. Accessed March 2019.Google Scholar
2.HTAi Website. Scientific Development and Capacity Building committee. Available at: https://htai.org/about-htai/committees-and-working-groups/scientific-development-and-capacity-committee/. Accessed March 2019.Google Scholar
3.Mueller, J, Guttiérez-Ibarluzea, I, Schuller, T et al. (2016) Capacity building in agencies for efficient and effective health technology assessment. IJTAHC 32(4), 292–299.Google Scholar
4.Mueller, J (2017) Building consensus on defining core competencies for high quality, effective and efficient HTA: Introduction. Workshop presentation, HTAi Annual Meeting, Rome, Italy, June 2017.Google Scholar
5.EUnetHTA (2018) Handbook on capacity building. Available at: http://www.inahta.org/wp-content/themes/inahta/img/eunethta_wp8_hb_hta_capacity_building1.pdf.Google Scholar
6.HTAi Website. Interest Groups. Available at: https://htai.org/interest-groups/. Accessed May 2019.Google Scholar
7.Matachi, A (2006) Capacity Building Framework. UNESCO-IICBA. Addis Ababa: United Nations Economic Commission for Africa.Google Scholar
8.Wignaraja, K (ed.) (2009) Capacity development: A UNDP Primer [Internet] United Nations Development Program; [cited 2019 May 8]. Available at: https://www.undp.org/content/dam/aplaws/publication/en/publications/capacity-development/capacity-development-a-undp-primer/CDG_PrimerReport_final_web.pdf.Google Scholar
9.Paul, S (1995) Capacity building for health sector reform. Forum on Health Sector Reform. Discussion paper no. 5. World Health Organization.Google Scholar
10.Lusthaus, C, Adrien, M-H, Perstinger, M (1999) Capacity development: Definitions, issues and implications for planning, monitoring and evaluation. Universalia Occasional Paper 25, 1–21.Google Scholar
11.Schacter, M (2000) “Capacity Building”: a new way of doing business for development assistance organizations. Institute on Governance. Policy Brief No. 6.Google Scholar
12.Potter, C, Brough, R (2004) Systematic capacity building: a hierarchy of needs. Health Policy Plan 19(5), 336–345.Google Scholar
13.Børlum Kristensen, F, Husereau, D, Huić, M et al. (2019) Identifying the need for good practices in health technology assessment: Summary of the ISPOR HTA Council Working Group Report on Good Practices in HTA. Value Health 22, 13–20.Google Scholar
14.Wild, C, Stricka, M, Patera, N (2017) Guidance for the development of a National HTA strategy. Health Policy Technol 6(3), 339–347.Google Scholar
15.Brereton, L, Ingleton, C, Gardiner, C et al. (2017) Lay and professional stakeholder involvement in scoping palliative care issues: Methods used in seven European countries. Palliat Med 31(2), 181–192.Google Scholar
16.Li, R, Ruiz, F, Culyer, AJ, Chalkidou, K, Hofman, KJ (2017) Evidence-informed capacity building for setting health priorities in low- and middle-income countries: A framework and recommendations for further research. F1000Res 6, 231. doi:10.12688/f1000research.10966.1.Google Scholar
17.Hunter, A, Facey, K, Thomas, V et al. (2018) EUPATI guidance for patient involvement in medicines research and development: Health Technology Assessment. Front Med (Lausanne) 5, 231. Published 2018 Sep 6. doi:10.3389/fmed.2018.00231.Google Scholar
18.Oortwijn, W, Sampietro-Colom, L, Habens, F, Trowman, R (2018) How can health systems prepare for new and emerging health technologies? The role of horizon scanning revisited. IJTAHC 34(3), 254–259.Google Scholar
19.Doherty, J, Wilkinson, T, Edoka, I et al. (2017) Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa. Glob Health Action 10, 1–10.Google Scholar
20.HTAsiaLink (2013) Capacity building for HTA…when there is no such thing as a “one-size-fits-all” model! HTAsiaLink Newsletter 5, 2–7.Google Scholar
21.Tantivess, S, Chalkidou, K, Tritasavit, N, Teerawattananon, Y (2017) Health Technology Assessment capacity development in low- and middle-income countries: Experiences from the international units of HITAP and NICE. F1000Research 6, 2119.Google Scholar