Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:59:00.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coverage with evidence development: A very good beginning, but much to be done. Commentary to Hutton et al.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

Sean R. Tunis  and
Kalipso Chalkidou
Sean R. Tunis
Affiliation:
Centre for Medical Technology Policy
Kalipso Chalkidou
Affiliation:
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and Johns Hopkins School of Public Health and Centre for Medical Technology Policy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The study by Hutton, Trueman, and Henshall provides a thoughtful and helpful set of observations about the potential benefits of linking reimbursement to requirements for further clinical research (coverage with evidence development—CED), as well as the likely challenges and obstacles to implementation. In this commentary, we will expand upon several of the key points made in their study and offer some additional suggestions for moving this policy discussion forward

Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 432 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)