Article contents
COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF IVABRADINE IN TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE IN IRAN
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2018
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of ivabradine plus standard of care (SoC) in comparison with current SoC alone from the Iranian payer perspective.
A cohort-based Markov model was developed to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a 10-year time horizon in a cohort of 1,000 patients. The baseline transition probabilities between New York Heart Association (NYHA), mortality rate, and hospitalization rate were extracted from the literature. The effect of ivabradine on mortality, hospitalization, and NYHA improvement or worsening were retrieved from the SHIFT study. The effectiveness was measured as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) using the utility values derived from Iranian Heart Failure Quality of Life study. Direct medical costs were obtained from hospital records and national tariffs. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to show the robustness of the model.
Ivabradine therapy was associated with an incremental cost per QALY of USD $5,437 (incremental cost of USD $2,207 and QALYs gained 0.41) versus SoC. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that ivabradine is expected to have a 60 percent chance of being cost-effective accepting a threshold of USD $6,550 per QALY. Furthermore, deterministic sensitivity analysis indicated that the model is sensitive to the ivabradine drug acquisition cost.
The cost-effectiveness model suggested that the addition of ivabradine to SoC therapy was associated with improved clinical outcomes along with increased costs. The analysis indicates that the clinical benefit of ivabradine can be achieved at a reasonable cost in eligible heart failure patients with sinus rhythm and a baseline heart rate ≥ 75 beats per minute (bpm).
- Type
- Assessment
- Information
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 34 , Issue 6 , 2018 , pp. 576 - 583
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018
Footnotes
This study is the outcome of a study approved by students’ research committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. This work was supported by the Rougine Darou Corporation. S.T. and M.A.A. were paid consultants to Rougine Darou Corp. For the purposes of this project M.V., E.H., and M.Sh. have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships. Conflict of interest: None. The authors thank Daniel Hurlbut for proofreading the article.
References
REFERENCES
- 5
- Cited by