Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:41:16.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biotechnical and Other Factors Affecting Orthognathic Surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Robert J. Isaacson  and
Robert A. Strauss
Robert J. Isaacson
Affiliation:
Medical College of Virginia
Robert A. Strauss
Affiliation:
Medical College of Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Orthognathic surgery is a rapidly growing biotechnologic interaction involving alterations of facial form and dental occlusion. This article describes some of the important and complex psychological, sociological, ethical, and public policy issues involved. Advances in the latter issues are necessary for advancement of the field.

Type
Special Section: Assessing the Technology of Dentistry, Part II
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , October 1990 , pp. 516 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ash, D. C. & Mercuri, L. G.The relationship between blood ordered and blood administered in orthognathic surgery. Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, 1985, 43, 944–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, R., Kiyak, H. A., Joondeph, D. et al. Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. American Journal of Orthodontics, 1985, 88, 323–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berscheid, E. S. An overview of the psychological effects of physical attractiveness. In Lucker, W. G., Ribbens, K. A. & McNamara, J. A. (eds.), Craniofacial growth series, Monograph No. 11. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 1980, 1–23.Google Scholar
Colligan, R. C., Sather, A. H. & Hollen, M. C. Psychological evaluation of the orthognathic surgical patient. In Lucker, W. G., Ribbens, K. A. & McNamara, J. A. (eds.), Craniofacial growth series, Monograph No. 11. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 1980, 161–70.Google Scholar
Graber, L. W. Psychological considerations of orthodontic treatment. In Lucker, W. G., Ribbens, K. A. & McNamara, J. A. (eds.), Craniofacial Growth Series, Monograph No. 11. Ann Arbor: Center for Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 1980, 81–117.Google Scholar
Kiyak, H. A. & Zeitler, D. L., Self assessment of profile and body image among orthognathic surgery patients before and two years after surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1988, 46, 365–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, R. E. & Laskin, D. M.Expectations of patients from orthognathic surgery. Journal of Oral Surgery, 1980, 38, 283–85.Google Scholar
Paulus, G. W. & Steinhauser, E. W.A comparative study of wire osteosynthesis versus bone screws in the treatment of mandibular prognathism. Journal of Oral Surgery, 1982, 54, 2–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proffit, W. R. & Epker, B. N. Treatment planning for dentofacial deformities. In Bell, W., Proffit, W. R. & White, R. P. (eds.), Surgical correction of dentofacial deformities, Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders, 1980, 177–87.Google Scholar
Redmond, A. C., Donner, L. & Tilghman, . Psychological evaluation of facial change following orthognathic surgery. In Lucker, W. G., Ribbens, K. A. & McNamara, J. A. (eds.), Craniofacialgrowth series, Monograph No. 11. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 1980, 119–41.Google Scholar