Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T09:04:45.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the Scientific Basis of Antenatal Care The Case of Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Gunilla Lindmark
Gunilla Lindmark
Affiliation:
University Hospital, Uppsala
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Swedish routine program for antenatal care is based on a number of scheduled visits for the detection of symptomless complications, as well as psychosocial support and health education. The scientific evidence to support the present timing and contents of routine visits is unsatisfactory, and there is a great need for evaluation both of single diagnostic procedures and interventions and of programs of antenatal care.

Type
The Setting of the Problem
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 8 , Supplement S1 , January 1992 , pp. 2 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Allmänna Råd från Socialstyrelsen 1981:4. Hälsovård för mödrar och barn inom primävården.Google Scholar
2.Banta, H. D., Houd, S., & Suarez Ojeda, E.Prenatal care—An Introduction. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1985, 1, 783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Børlum Kristenssen, F.Evaluering af svangeromsorg. Dissertation. Copenhagen: Institut for Almen Medicin, 1987.Google Scholar
4.Brody, H., & Thompson, J. R.The maximum strategy in modern obstetrics. The Journal of Family Practice, 1981, 12, 977.Google Scholar
5.Caring for our future: The content of prenatal care. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, 1989.Google Scholar
6. Declaration of Monastir. Second International Congress of Maternal and Neonatal Health, Monastir, Tunisia, 11 1984.Google Scholar
7. Having a baby in Europe. Report of the WHO Perinatal Study Group, WHO/Copenhagen, 1986.Google Scholar
8.MF 1969:39. Normalreglemente för mödra- och barnhälsovården.Google Scholar
9.Siegler, M.Pascal’s wager and the hanging of crepe. New England Journal of Medicine, 1975, 293, 853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.SFS 745:1937. Kungörelse om statsbidrag i den förebyggande mödra- och barnavården.Google Scholar
11.SFS 399:1944. Kungörelse om kostnadsfria läkemedel för behandling under graviditet.Google Scholar
12.Socialstyrelsen redovisar 1979:4. Mödra- och barnhälsovård. Förslag till principprogram.Google Scholar
13.SOU:1929:28. Betänkande angående moderskapsskydd.Google Scholar
14.SOU:1935:19. Kungliga Medicinalstyrelsens utlåtande och förslag angående förebyggande mödra- och barnavård.Google Scholar
15.SOU:1936.12. Betänkande angående förlossningsvården och barnmorskeväsendet samt före byggande mödra- och barnavård.Google Scholar
16.SOU:1942:17. Betänkande med utredning och förslag angående barnmorskeväsendet.Google Scholar