Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:50:05.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE ADDED VALUE OF INTEGRATE-HTA GUIDANCE IN THE WORK PROCESSES OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AGENCIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2017

Gert Jan van der Wilt ,
Wietske Kievit  and
Wija Oortwijn
Gert Jan van der Wilt
Affiliation:
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and [email protected]
Wietske Kievit
Affiliation:
Radboud Institute for Health Sciences
Wija Oortwijn
Affiliation:
EcorysNetherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A central idea underlying the INTEGRATE-HTA project is that many of the interventions that are being used in health care are quite complex. By this, we mean that the relation between the delivery of the intervention on the one hand, and the onset of (desired and undesired) changes may be less straightforward than hoped for. There may be all sorts of reasons for this, varying from a lack of resources, lack of skills, perverse incentives, organizational problems, etc. Not identifying such factors and their potential impact may seriously compromise the policy relevance of a health technology assessment (HTA) (1). However, current approaches and methods in HTA do not seem to be adequately geared to deal with this complexity.

Type
Theme Submissions
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 33 , Issue 5: Assessing Health Technologies in an Integrated Way-Results of the INTEGRATE-HTA Project , 2017 , pp. 597 - 598
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Brereton, L, et al, this issue.Google Scholar
2. Bond, K, Weeks, L. Using the INTEHRATE-HTA Guidance: Experience from CADTH. This volume.Google Scholar
3. Banta, HD, Luce, BR. Health care technology and its assessment. An international perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993:61.Google Scholar
4. Daniels, N, Sabin, J, Accountability for Reasonableness: an update. BMJ. 2008;337:a1850.Google Scholar
5. Daniels, N, van der Wil, GJ, Health Technology Assessment, deliberative process, and ethically contested issues. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016;32:10–15. (See also the contribution of Bond and Weeks in this volume, reporting on their experience with using the INTEGRATE-HTA guidance on addressing ethical issues in the context of HTA)Google Scholar