Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T08:59:24.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women, Health, and Medical Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Inger Stauning
Inger Stauning
Affiliation:
Roskilde University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New medical technologies are often developed and diffused in health care without societal assessments or setting of priorities. This article discusses the driving forces behind the development of new technologies and asks how women as users and providers of health services can gain influence on the process. Technologies used in pregnancy and childbirth are discussed to reveal different interests in their development and use and to discuss the role of industry in the development of new medical technologies in general.

Type
Special Section: Assessing Nursing and Technology
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Spring 1994 , pp. 273 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Andreasen, P. B.Industri og sygehuse (Industry and hospitals). Copenhagen: Dansk Sygehus Institut, 1990.Google Scholar
2.BICEPS. Centre National de I’equipement hospitalier: Report presentation and methodology. EEC, 1986.Google Scholar
3.Bullard, L. Killing us softly: Towards a feminist analysis of genetic engineering. In Spallone, P. & Steinberg, D. L. (eds.), Made to order. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1987,110–19.Google Scholar
4.de Witt, A., & Banta, D.Diffusion of in-vitro fertilization in the Netherlands and England. An exploratory study. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1991, 7, 574–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Ellis, C. Routine ultrasound in pregnancy. In Spencer, J. A. D. (ed.), Fetal monitoring. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, 37–40.Google Scholar
6.Houd, S.Foedselguide—hvoroghvordan (Guide to birth places). Copenhagen: Forbrugerradet, 1992.Google Scholar
7.Jönsson, B. What can Americans learn from Europeans? In Health care systems in transition, Social Policy Studies no. 7. Paris: OECD, 1990, 87–118.Google Scholar
8.Knudsen, J. L.Fosterdiagnostik—for og nu (Fetal diagnostics—before and now). Copenhagen: Dansk Sygehus Institut, 1990.Google Scholar
9.Koch, L.Oenskeboern: Kvinder og reagensglasbefrugtning (Wanted children: Women and IVF technology). Copenhagen: Rosinante, 1989.Google Scholar
10.McKinlay, J. From “promising report” to “standard procedure”: Seven stages in the career of a medical innovation. In Mckinlay, J. (ed.), Technology and the future of health care. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982, 233–70.Google Scholar
11.National Action Committee on the Status of Women (Canada). The new reproductive technologies: A technological handmaid’s tale. Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering, 1991, 4, 279–96.Google Scholar
12.National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Consensus Development Panel. Consensus statement: Diagnostic ultrasound in pregnancy. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1984.Google Scholar
13.Pfeffer, N. Artificial insemination, in-vitro fertilization, and the stigma of infertility. In Stanworth, M. (ed.), Reproductive technologies. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1987, 81–97.Google Scholar
14.Stauning, I.Teknologi i sundhedssektoren—Mellem branchestrategi og brugerinteresser (Technology in the health care sector —Needs of users and producers). PhD dissertation. Roskilde, Denmark: TEKSAM-forlaget, Roskilde Universitetscenter, 1990.Google Scholar
15.Stocking, B. (ed.). Expensive health technologies. Regulatory and administrative mechanisms in Europe. Commission of the European Communities, Health Services Research Series no. 5. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1988.Google Scholar
16.Sundhedsstyrelsen (National Board of Health [Denmark]). Untralydscreening af gravide kvinder (Ultrasound screening of pregnant women). Copenhagen: Sundhedsstyrelsen, 1986.Google Scholar
17.Testart, J.L'oeuf transparent. Paris: Ed. Flammarion, 1986.Google Scholar
18.Thacker, S. B. Effectiveness and safety of intrapartum fetal monitoring. In Spencer, J. A. D. (ed.), Fetal monitoring. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, 211–17.Google Scholar
19.World Health Organization Committee on Health Research. Health research strategy for health for all by the year 2000. Geneva: WHO, 1986.Google Scholar