Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:54:57.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technological Innovation and the Winning-Combination Phenomenon: The Case of the Extracorporeal Lithotriptor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Diane Poulin
Diane Poulin
Affiliation:
Université Laval, Québec
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are situations where, for many reasons, an innovation considered revolutionary in several respects is widely accepted by those whose ways of doing things are transformed by it. The innovation represents a “winning combination” in that it combines such attractive elements that each party, for its own reasons, will desire its adoption and work toward that common goal. In France, and particularly in the Assistance Publique de Paris and in the Hospices Civils de Lyon, such has been the case with the German-made Dornier extracorporeal lithotriptor, an innovation that makes it possible to destroy kidney stones without surgery.

Type
Research Notes
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , Winter 1991 , pp. 63 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. Àquoi tient le succès des innovations? Premier épisode: L'art de l'intéressement. Annales des Mines, Gérer et Comprendre, 1988, 11, 4–17.Google Scholar
2.Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. Àquoi teint le succès des innovations? Deuxième episode: L'art de choisir les bons porte-parole. Annales desMines, Gèrer et Comprendre, 1988, 12, 14–29.Google Scholar
3.Baker, S.The diffusion of high technology medical innovation: The computer tomography scanner example. Social Science and Medicine, 1979, 13D, 155–62.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Banta, H. D.The diffusion of the computed tomography (CT) scanner in the United States. International Journal of Health Services, 1980, 10, 251–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Banta, H. D.Some aphorisms concerning medical technology illustrated by specific case examples. The technology explosion in medical science: Implications for the health care in dustry and the public. Knoxville, TN: S.M. Medical Books, 1983, 85–99.Google Scholar
6.Brozovitch, J. P., & Lotus, G. D. Physician-administrator decision making for hi-technology purchases: A model approach. HCM Review, Aspen Systems Corp, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Greer, A. L.Hospital adoption of medical technology: A preliminary investigation into hospital decision-making. Project for the Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Legislation, Health Resource Administration, Department of Health Education and Welfare, 03 1977.Google Scholar
8.McKinlay, J. B.From “promising report” to “standard procedure”: Seven stages in the career of a medical innovation. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, Health and Society, 1981, 59, 232–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Pfeffer, J.Power in organizations. Boston: Pitman Publishing Inc., 1989.Google Scholar