Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:08:08.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Potential of Technological Innovations for the Disabled

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Morris Milner
Morris Milner
Affiliation:
The Hugh MacMillan Rehabilitation Centre and University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstarct

Technical innovations have enormous potential for enhancing the lives of people with disabilities, often providing means for substantial independence and contributing to their dignity. This paper uses a framework related to the personal needs of individuals throughout the hours of waking and rest. Examples of various potentialities are provided and discussed.

Type
Special Section: Technology and Disability
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Spring 1995 , pp. 187 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.1991 Annual Report. Toronto: Rehabilitation Engineering Department, The Hugh MacMillan Rehabilitation Centre, 69–74.Google Scholar
2.1992 Annual Report. Toronto: Rehabilitation Engineering Department, The Hugh MacMillan Rehabilitation Centre, in press.Google Scholar
3.Bothe, H-H., & Rieger, F. Developing a computer animation program for teaching lipreading. Proceedings of TIDE Congress. Brussels, 04 1993.Google Scholar
4.Bush, G., & Sauter, W.F. A powered othotic device for A.L.S. patients: A single case study. Workers and workplaces, quality of life: A reference manual. Fourth Canadian Congress of Rehabilitation, 1989.Google Scholar
5.Farr, S., Mifsud, M., Naumann, S., & Young, M. The development of a multifunction vehicular control interface unit for quadriplegic drivers. Proceedings of the 14th Annual RESNA Conference. Kansas City, 06 1991, 409–10.Google Scholar
6.Hamann, G., Shein, F., & Treviranus, J. Access to MS Windows 3.0 with the long range wand. Proceedings of the CSUN 91 Technology and Persons with Disabilities Annual Conference, 06 1991, 335–344.Google Scholar
7.Knox, R. The application of microcomputer alternate access methods to music composition and education. 1991 Annual Report. Toronto: Rehabilitation Engineering Department, The Hugh MacMillan Rehabilitation Centre, 77–78.Google Scholar
8.Kutz, I. The Nintendo entertainment system — Myoelectric signal interface system (Nemisia). Presentation to Association of Children's Prosthetic and Orthotic Clinics Annual Meeting. Tampa, 05 19–23, 1993.Google Scholar
9.Kyberd, P., Tregidgo, R., Holland, O. et al. The MARCUS intelligent hand prosthesisProceedings of TIDE Congress. Brussels, 04 1993, in press.Google Scholar
10.Milner, M. Rehabilitation technology: Exploitation of R&D and current technologies. Proceedings of TIDE Congress. Brussels, 04 1993, in press.Google Scholar
11.Milner, M., Mifsud, M., & Bush, G. Powered upper extremity prosthetics research and developments: Improved pediatric myoprosthetic components. Proceedings of the Seventh World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics. Chicago, 06 28–July 3, 1992, 194.Google Scholar
12.Ryan, S. E. Toward development of a system for safely transporting children with physical disabilities in motor vehicles: Final report. National Health Research and Development Programme, Health and Welfare Canada, 10, 1991.Google Scholar
13.Ryan, S. E., Millage, J., Gibbs, C., & Naumann, S. Development of a wheelchair assessable weight-training apparatus. Proceedings of ICAART 88, International Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Rehabilitation Technology. Montreal, 06 1988, 240–41 06.Google Scholar
14.Slater, J, et al. Helping visually impaired people to gain more from television: The AUDETEL Project. Proceedings of TIDE Congress. Brussels, 04 1993, in press.Google Scholar
15.Zagler, W. L., Mayer, P., Seiler, F. P., & Winkler, N. Technical possibilities for the improvement of orientation and mobility for disabled persons. Proceedings of TIDE Congress. Brussels, 04 1993, in press.Google Scholar