Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:20:39.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Outcome of Total Hip Replacement in Japan and England: Comparison of Two Retrospective Cohorts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Kyoko Imamura  and
Nick Black
Kyoko Imamura
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Nick Black
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two retrospective cohorts of patients who had undergone a primary total hip replacement (THR) were studied in Japan and England. We analyzed information from hospital case notes and self-administered questionnaires. THR was highly effective in both countries, with significant improvements in morbidity and health status. There were, however, important differences in clinical management and outcome. Japanese patients were more likely to be treated under regional anesthesia by means of an anterior/anterolateral incision, to be transfused, to have a prosthesis implanted without cement, and to stay longer in the hospital. A higher rate of serious in-hospital complications occurred in England, mostly due to the high frequency of hypotension. The incidences of minor complications were consistent with known differences in risks between the two countries. The persistent postoperative perception of limping reported by the English patients was unexpected.

Keywords

Total Hip ReplacementOutcomeClinical Management
Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , Fall 1998 , pp. 762 - 773
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Barrack, R. L., & Lebar, R. D.Clinical and radiographic analysis of the uncemented LSF total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty, 1992, 7(suppl.), 353–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Boettcher, W. G.Total hip arthroplasties in the elderly. Clinical Orthopaedics, 1992, 274, 30–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Callaghan, J. J.Total hip arthroplasty: Clinical perspective. Clinical Orthopaedics, 1992, 276, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Charnley, J.Arthroplasty of the hip; A new operation. Lancet, 1961, 1, 1129–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Christensen, C. M., Seger, B. M., & Schultz, R. B.Management of intraoperative femur fractures associated with revision hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics, 1989, 248, 177–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Cupic, Z.Long term follow up of Charnley arthroplasty of the hip. Clinical Orthopaedics, 1979, 141, 28–43.Google Scholar
7.Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Murray, D., & Carr, A.The problem of ‘noise’ in monitoring patient-based outcomes: Generic, disease-specific and site-specific instruments for total hip replacement. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 1996, 1, 224–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Fredin, H., Sanzen, L., Sigurdssan, B., & Onander-Scharin, L.Total hip arthroplasty in high congenital dislocation: 21 hips with a minimum five-year follow-up. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1991, 73-B, 430–33.Google ScholarPubMed
9.German Hip Arthroplasty Trial (GHAT) Group. Prevention of deep vein thrombosis with low molecular-weight heparin in patients undergoing total hip replacement. A randomized trial. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 1992, 111, 110–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Goldberg, V. M.Anatomic cementless total hip replacement: Design considerations and early clinical experience. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 1993, 59(suppl. 1), 183–89.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Greenfield, S., Apolone, G., McNeil, B. J., & Cleary, P. D.The importance of coexistent disease in the occurrence of postoperative complications and one-year recovery in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Medical Care, 1993, 31, 141–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Harris, W. H.The first 32 years of total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics, 1992, 274, 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Harris, W. H., & Sledge, C. B.Total hip and total knee replacement. New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 323, 725–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Henry, J. D., & Reilly, D.Two-to-four-year experience with cemented, press-fit, and porous coated applications of the profile total hip system. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 1993, 59(suppl.), 190–94.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Hertzman, P., Johnsson, R., & Lindgren, B.Cost of sick leave for total hip replacement. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavia, 1988, 59, 266–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Huo, M. H., Salvati, E. A., Sharrock, N. E., et al. Intraoperative heparin thromboembolic prophylaxis in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics, 1992, 274, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Jinnah, R. H., Chir, B., Amstutz, H. C., et al. The UCLA Charnley experience: A long-term follow-up study using survival analysis. Clinical Orthopaedics, 1986, 211, 164–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Katz, J. N., Phillips, C. B., Fossel, A. H., & Liang, M. H.Stability and responsiveness of utility measures. Medical Care, 1994, 32, 183–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Kawakami, T., Nakaya, T., Takahashi, T., et al. Questionnaire survey of elderly patient after implant arthroplasty. Journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, 1989, 63, S358.Google Scholar
20.Kawamura, M., Yokoyama, Y., Hanakawa, S., Usui, M., & Inoue, H.Dislocation after total hip replacement. Chu-bu Sei-Sai Shi, 1991, 34, 1827–28.Google Scholar
21.Khan, M. A. A., Brakenbury, P. H., & Reynolds, I. S. R.Dislocation following total hip replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1981, 63-B, 214–18.Google Scholar
22.Liang, M. H., Cullen, K. E., Larson, M. G., et al. Cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatology, 1986, 29, 937–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Liang, M. H., Fossel, A. H., & Larson, M. G.Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Medical Care, 1990, 28, 632–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Malchau, H., Herberts, P., & Ahnfelt, L.Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978–1990. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavia, 1993, 64, 497–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Michelson, J. D., Lotke, P. A., & Steinberg, M. E.Urinary-bladder management after total joint replacement surgery. New England Journal of Medicine, 1988, 319, 321–26.Google ScholarPubMed
26.Michelson, J. D., & Riley, L. H.Considerations in the comparison of cemented and cementless total hip prosthesis. Journal of Arthroplasty, 1989, 4, 327–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.O’Boyle, C. A., McGee, H., Hickey, A., O’Malley, K., & Joyce, C. R. B.Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement. Lancet, 1992, 339, 1088–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Ritter, M. A., Faris, P. M., & Keating, E. M.Urinary tract catheterization protocols following total joint arthroplasty. Orthopaedics, 1989, 8, 1085–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Salvati, E. A., Hughes, P., & Lachiewicz, P. L.Total hip replacement arthroplasty in one stage. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1978, 60-A, 640–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Seagroatt, V., Tan, H. S., Goldacre, M., et al. Elective total hip replacement: Incidence, emergency readmission rate, and postoperative mortality. British Medical Journal, 1991, 303, 1431–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Sharrock, N. E., Brien, W. W., Salvati, E. A., et al. The effect of intravenous fixed-dose heparin during total hip arthroplasty on the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis. A randomized, double-blind trial in patients operated on with epidural anesthesia and controlled hypotension. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1990, 72-A, 1456–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Sheppeard, H., Cleak, D. K., Ward, D. J., & O’Connor, B. T.A review of early morbidity and mortality in elderly patients following Charnley total hip replacement. Archives of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, 1980, 97, 243–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Shwartz, J. T., Mayer, J. G., & Engh, C. A.Femoral fracture during non-cemented total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1989, 71-A, 1135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Solis, M. M., Ranval, T. J., Nix, M. L., et al. Is anticoagulation indicated for asymptomatic postoperative calf vein thrombosis? Journal of Vascular Surgery, 1992, 16, 414–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Stark, A., Elssner-Beyer, T., & Wolf, L.Operative aspects of prosthesis change in the hip joint after fracture of the prosthesis shaft. Unfallchirurg, 1991, 94, 355–59.Google ScholarPubMed
36.Stucki, G., Liang, M. H., Phillips, C., & Katz, J. N.The Shortform-36 is preferable to SIP as a generic health status measure in patients undergoing elective hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Care and Research, 1995, 8, 174–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Toni, A., Ciaroni, D., Sudanese, A., et al. Incidence of intraoperative femoral fracture. Straight-stemmed versus anatomic cementless total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 1994, 60, 43–54.Google ScholarPubMed
38.White, R. H., McCurdy, S. A., & Marder, R. A.Morbidity after total hip replacement. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1990, 5, 304–09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed