Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:42:08.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oral Radiology: An Expanding Technology in Search of a Direction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Hans-Göran Gröndahl
Hans-Göran Gröndahl
Affiliation:
University of Gothenburg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Oral radiology still seems to be expanding depending upon increasing availability of dental care. It is widely used more or less routinely, although investigations on efficacy, cost-benefit, and cost-effectiveness are sparse. Such studies should be encouraged and decision-making courses included in dental curricula. Decision-making aids and clinical algorithms should be developed to increase efficiency of oral radiology and to help in the abandonment of its routine use.

Type
Special Section: Assessing the Technology of Dentistry, Part II
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , October 1990 , pp. 610 - 620
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlqwist, M., Bengtsson, C., Gröndahl, H.-G. & Halling, A.Tooth mortality in women in a 12-year follow-up of a population sample in Gothenburg, Sweden. Community Dental Oral Epidemiology, 1986, 14, 358–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Dental Association Council on Dental Materials and Devices. Recommendation on radiographic practices. Journal of the American Dental Association, 1978, 96, 485–86.Google Scholar
Andreasen, J. O. Classification, etiology and epidemiology. Traumatic Injuries of the Teeth. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1981, 40–41.Google Scholar
Bergenholtz, G. & Nyman, S.Endodontic complications following periodontal and prosthetic treatment of patients with advanced periodontal disease. Journal of Periodontology, 1984 55,2, 63–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beideman, R. W., Johnson, O. N. & Alcoy, R. W.A study to develop a rating system and evaluate dental radiography submitted to a third party carrier. Journal of American Dental Association, 1976, 93, 1010–13.Google Scholar
Brooks, Sh. L.A study of selection criteria for intraoral dental radiography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1986, 62, 234–39.Google Scholar
Buchholz, R. E.Histologic-radiographic relation of proximal surface carious lesions. Journal of Preventive Dentistry, 1977, 4, 23–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Douglass, C. W., Valachovic, R. W., Berkey, C. S. et al. Clinical indicators of radiographically detectable dental diseases in the adult patient. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1988, 65, 474–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglass, C. W., Valachovic, R. W., Wijesinha, A. et al. The clinical efficacy of dental radiography in the detection of dental caries and periodontal disease. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1986, 62, 330–39.Google Scholar
Espelid, I. & Björg, Tveit A.Clinical and radiographic assessment of approximal carious lesions. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 1986, 44, 31–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espelid, I., Tveit, A. B., Haugejorden, O. & Riordan, P. J.Variation in radiographic interpretation and restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries among dentists in Norway. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 1985, 13, 26–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, S. J.Biological effects of radiation from dental radiography. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. Journal of American Dental Association, 1982, 105, 275–81.Google ScholarPubMed
Glass, R. I.The first international conference on the declining prevalence of dental caries. Journal of Dental Research, 1982, 61, 1304.Google Scholar
Gröndahl, H.-G.Decision strategies in radiographic caries diagnosis. Swedish Dental Journal, 1979, 3, 1–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Gröndahl, H.-G. Diagnostic testing. Textbook of cariology. Thylstrup, A. & Fejerskov, O. (eds.), Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1986Google Scholar
Gröndahl, H.-G. Radiographic assessment of caries and caries progression. In Anusavice, K. (ed.), Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., 1989, 151–67.Google Scholar
Gröndahl, H.-G.Radiographic caries diagnosis and treatment decisions. Swedish Dental Journal, 1979, 3, 109–17.Google Scholar
Gröndahl, H.-G. & Hollender, L. The value of the radiologic examination in caries diagnosis. In Thylstrup, A. & Fejerskov, O. (eds.), Textbook of cariology. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1986.Google Scholar
Gwinnett, A. J.A comparison of proximal carious lesions as seen by clinical radiography, contract microradiography, and light microscopy. Journal of American Dental Association, 1971, 83, 1078–80.Google Scholar
Marthaler, T. M. & Germann, M.Radiographic and visual appearance of small smooth surface caries lesions studied on extracted teeth. Caries Research, 1970, 4, 224–42.Google Scholar
Matteson, S. R. et al. A survey of radiographs obtained at the initial dental examination and patient selection criteria for bitewings at recall. Journal of American Dental Association, 1983, 107, 586–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mejàre, I., Gröndahl, H.-G., Carlstedt, K. et al. Accuracy at radiography and probing for the diagnosis of proximal caries. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, 1985, 93, 178–84.Google Scholar
Mettler, F. A. Jr, Davis, M., Kelsey, Ch. A. et al. Analytical modeling of worldwide medical radiation use. Health Physics, 1987, 52, 133–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papapanou, P. N., Wennström, J. L. & Gröndahl, K.A 10-year retrospective study of periodontal disease progression. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 1989, 16, 403–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purdell-Lewis, D. J., Groeneveld, A., Pot, T. J. & Kvant, W.Proximal carious lesions: A comparison of visual, radiographical and microradiographical appearance. Netherland Dental Journal, 1974, 81, 6–15.Google Scholar
Reit, C.On decision making in endodontics. A study of diagnosis and management of periapical lesions in endodontically treated teeth. Swedish Dental Journal, 1986, 41 (suppl.).Google ScholarPubMed
René, N.Odontologiska ansvarsfrågor 1947–1983. Malmö. Studentlitteratur, 1988, 75–76.Google Scholar
Richards, A. G. & Colquitt, W. N.Reduction in dental x-ray exposures during the past 60 years. Journal of American Dental Association, 1981, 103, 713–18.Google Scholar
Rugg-Gunn, A. J.Approximal carious lesions. British Dental Journal, 1972, 133, 481–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shwartz, M., Gröndahl, H.-G., Pliskin, J. S. & Boffa, J.A longitudinal analysis from bite-wing radiographs of the rate of progression of approximal carious lesions through human dental enamel. Archives of Oral Biology, 1984, 29, 529–36.Google Scholar
Shwartz, M., Pliskin, J. S., Gröndahl, H.-G. & Boffa, J.A mathematical model of dental caries used to evaluate the benefits of alternative frequencies of bitewing radiographs. Management Science, 1987, 33, 771–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shwartz, M., Pliskin, J. S., Gröndahl, H.-G. & Boffa, J.The expected benefits from alternative frequencies of bitewing radiograms. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 1986, 44, 11–16.Google Scholar
Shwartz, M., Pliskin, J. S., Gröndahl, H.-G. & Boffa, J.The frequency of bitewing radio-graphs. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1986, 61, 300–05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, H. R., Alattar, M., Collet, W. K. et al. Pathological sequelae of “neglected” impacted third molars. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1987, 64, 567.Google Scholar
Stenström, B.Dose contributions to the Swedish population from oral radiography. Swedish Dental Journal, 1986, 40 (suppl).Google Scholar
Stenström, B., Bergman, K., Blomgren, P.-G. & Henrikson, C. O.Collective dose to the Swedish population from intraoral radiography. Swedish Dental Journal, 1988, 12, 17–25.Google Scholar
Strid, K.-G. Radiographic procedures. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses. Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing, 1985, 317–327.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dental Radiographs, final recommendations. Federal Regulations, 1980, 45, 40976–79.Google Scholar
White, S. C., Hollender, L. & Barton, M. G.Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of proximal surface caries. Journal of American Dental Association, 1984, 108, 755–59.Google Scholar
Wulff, H. R. Diagnosis and the laws of chance. In Rational Diagnosis and Treatment. An introduction to clinical decision-making. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1981, 80–102.Google Scholar
Zeichner, S. J., Ruttiman, U. E. & Webber, R. L.Dental radiography: Efficacy in the assessment of intraosseous lesions of the face and jaws in asymptomatic patients. Radiology, 1987, 162, 691–95.Google Scholar