Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:04:41.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Information needs of health technology assessment units and agencies in Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2010

Lorea Galnares-Cordero
Affiliation:
Osteba, Basque Office for Health Technology Assessment
Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea
Affiliation:
Nursing University School Vitoria-Gasteiz and Osteba, Basque Office for Health Technology Assessment

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the information needs of Spanish health technology assessment (HTA) agencies and units to facilitate access to the resources they require to substantiate their reports.

Methods: A questionnaire was designed and distributed among HTA bodies to ascertain the actual situation of subscriptions to information resources and what information specialists from these bodies considered would be the ideal subscription situation. Their information needs were then studied, and the resources that best met these needs were put forward. Following this definition, a subscriptions policy was adopted with suppliers and publishers.

Results: The survey showed that HTA bodies share a minimum of core subscriptions that includes open sources (MEDLINE, DARE) and sources that the government subscribes to for the health community (ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library Plus). There was no common approach to determining which databases to subscribe to (UpToDate, EMBASE, Ovid EBMR, CINAHL, or ECRI). After identifying the information needs, a list of resources was proposed that would best cover these needs and, of these, subscription to the following was proposed: Scopus, Ovid EBMR, Clinical Evidence, DynaMed, ECRI, and Hayes.

Conclusions: There are differences in the way that HTA agencies and units access the different resources of biomedical information. Combined subscription to several resources for documentation services was suggested as a way of resolving these differences.

Type
THEME SECTION: INFORMATION RETRIEVAL FOR HTA
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Araujo, M. [Scientific information in health: Internet basics and biomedical databases use]. Ministerio de Salud de Chile: Unidad de Evaluación de Tecnologías de Salud; 2002.Google Scholar
2. Bidwell, S, Fabricious Jensen, M. Etext on Health Technology Assessment (HTA) information resources. Chapter 3: Using a search protocol to identify sources of information: The COSI model. Bethesda, MD: National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health Care Technology (NICHSR); 2006. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/archive/20060905/nichsr/ehta/chapter3.html (accessed March 2010).Google Scholar
3. Conde, J, Imaz, I, González, J, Alcaide, JF. [How to conduct health technologies assessment reports. Manual]. Madrid: Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (AETS); 1999.Google Scholar
4. Conde, J. [Evidence based health technology assessments]. Manuscritos de la AETS. Madrid: Instituto de Salud Carlos III; 2002.Google Scholar
5. Douw, K, Vondeling, H, Eskildsen, D, Simpson, S. Use of the Internet in scanning the horizon for new and emerging health technologies: A survey of agencies involved in horizon scanning. J Med Internet Res. 2003;5:3345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Etext on Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Information Resources. National Library of Medicine (2002). http://www.nlm.nih.gov/archive//2060905/nichsr/ehta/ehta.html (accessed March 2010).Google Scholar
7. EUnetHTA Work Package 8. EUnetHTA handbook on health technology assessment capacity building. Barcelona (Spain): Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research. Catalan Health Service. Department of Health Autonomous Government of Catalonia; 2008.Google Scholar
8. Güemes Careaga, I, Gutierrez Ibarluzea, I. [Literature bibliographic search protocols adapting them to the different research outputs]. Madrid: Plan Nacional para el SNS del MSC. Servicio de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias del País Vasco (Osteba); 2007. Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias: OSTEBA No.2007/01.Google Scholar
9. Güemes-Careaga, I, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, I. Biomedical literature search protocols: Consensus statement from the documentation units of the Spanish health technology assessment agencies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:104111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, I, Egües-Olazabal, N. [Bibliographic search protocols]. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Gobierno Vasco. Departamento de Sanidad; 2005. Report No. Osteba D-05-07.Google Scholar
11. HTAi vortal. http://www.htai.org/index.php?id=229 (accessed March 2010).Google Scholar
12. Hyland, P, Wright, L. Using statistics for database management in an academic library. Aust Acad Res Libr. 1996;27:169181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Ibargoyen-Roteta, N, Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, I, Asua, J, Benguria-Arrate, G, Galnares-Cordero, L. Scanning the horizon of obsolete Technologies: Possible sources for their identification. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:249254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Kubesch, N, Parada, A, Moharra, M, Estrada, MD, Cortés, M. Espallargues M on behalf of Work Package 8, EUnetHTA project. Information Management in HTA Organisations. Survey Report. Barcelona (Spain): Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research. Catalan Health Service. Department of Health. Autonomous Government of Catalonia; May 2008.Google Scholar
15. López, M. [Medical databases on the Internet]. Atencion primaria/Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria. 1999;24:224227.Google ScholarPubMed
16. Ministry of Health and Social Policy. Quality plan for the Spanish National Health System 2006–2010. http://www.msc.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/home.htm (accessed March 2010).Google Scholar
17. Parada Martínez, A, Millaret Senpau, M, Parada Martínez, I, Pons Ràfols, JMV, and the group of information and dissemination specialists of the Spanish Agencies and Units for Health Technology Assessment (AUnETS). [Assessment of the bibliographic impact of the reports and journal articles written by the Spanish agencies and units for health technology assessment]. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, AATRM; 2007.Google Scholar
18. Ponsati, A. [A gateway to all electronic information resources for the CSIC: MetaLib]. Enredadera. Boletín electrónico de la Red de Bibliotecas del CSIC. No. 10. July 2004.Google Scholar
19. Sampson, M, McGowan, J, Lefebvre, C, Moher, D, Grimshaw, J. PRESS: Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2008.Google Scholar
20. Sobrido Prieto, M, González Guitián, C, Cerdá Mota, T, and the group of information and dissemination specialists of the Spanish Agencies and Units for Health Technology Assessment (AUnETS). [Strategies for the diffusion and dissemination of health technology assessment (HTA) products]. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. avalia-t No. 2007/07.Google Scholar
21. Suárez Balseiro, C, Sanz Casado, E, Vergara González, P, Sotolongo Aguilar, G. [Usage analysis of the Carlos the IIIrd University of Madrid library's database]. Rev Esp Doc Cient. 2001;24:2335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Térmens Graells, M. [Consortia: A new era of library co-operation]. El profesional de la información. 2005;14:166173.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Galnares-Cordero & Gutierrez-Ibarluzea supplementary material

Supplementary table

Download Galnares-Cordero & Gutierrez-Ibarluzea supplementary material(File)
File 184.3 KB