Article contents
Evidence-Informed Update of Argentina’s Health Benefit Package: Application of a Rapid Review Methodology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2022
Abstract
Argentina has a fragmented healthcare system with social security covering almost two thirds of the population. Its benefit package—called compulsory medical program (PMO; by its Spanish acronym Programa Médico Obligatorio)—has not been formally and widely updated since 2005. However, laws, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), and a high-cost technology reimbursement fund complement it. Our objective was to comprehensively review such a PMO and propose an update considering the corresponding complementary sources.
We followed four steps: (i) identification of health technologies from the current PMO and complementary sources, (ii) prioritization, (iii) assessment through rapid health technology assessment (HTA), and (iv) appraisal and recommendations. We evaluated three value domains: quality of evidence, net benefit, and economics, which were summarized in a five-category recommendation traffic-light scale ranging from a strong recommendation in favor of inclusion to a strong recommendation for exclusion.
Eight hundred fifty technologies were identified; 164 of those, considered as high priority, were assessed through rapid HTAs. Those technologies mentioned in laws and CPGs were mostly outpatient essential medicines, whereas those from the reimbursement system were mostly high-cost drugs; of these 101 technologies, 50 percent were recommended to be kept in the PMO. The other 63 (identified by the Superintendence of Health Services, technology producers, and patients) were mostly medical procedures and high-cost drugs; only 25 percent of those resulted in a favorable recommendation.
A methodology based on four clearly identified steps was used to carry out a comprehensive review of an outdated and fragmented benefit package. The use of rapid HTAs and a traffic-light recommendation framework facilitated the deliberative evidence-based update.
- Type
- Method
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Footnotes
We would like to thank researchers Cecilia Mengarelli, MD, and Silvana Cesaroni, MD, Daniel Comande, and Mónica Soria for their work as documentalists and Miss Gabriela Rodriguez for her administrative support. We would also like to thank Edgardo Von Ew and Eduardo Walter Salewsky (ISALUD University), Constantino Touloupas, MD, and Guadalupe Soulages, PharmD, for their research and technical cooperation during this project.
References
- 2
- Cited by