Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:15:07.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Endoscopy in the Evaluaton of Dyspepsia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Technology Assessment Reports
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , February 1986 , pp. 337 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Editorial data base on dyspepsia. British Medical Journal, 1978, 6121, 1163–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Mollmann, K. M., Bonnevie, O., Gudbrand Hoyer, E., & Wulff, H. R.A diagnostic study of patients with upper abdominal pain. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1975, 10, 105–9.Google Scholar
3.Barnes, R. J., Gear, M. W. L., Nicol, A., & Dew, A. B.Study of dyspepsia in a general practice as assessed by endoscopy and radiology. British Medical Journal, 1974, 4, 214–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Kiil, J., & Anderson, D.X-ray examination and/or endoscopy in the diagnosis of gastroduodenal ulcer and cancer. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1979, 15, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Read, L., Pass, T. M., & Komaroff, A. I.Diagnosis and treatment of dyspepsia, a cost effectiveness analysis. Medical Decision Making. 1982, 2, 416–38.Google Scholar
6.Horrocks, J. C., & de Dombal, F. T.Clinical presentation of patients with dyspepsia, detailed symptomatic study of 360 patients. Gut, 1978, 19, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Rinaldo, J. A. Jr, Scheinok, P., & Rupe, C. E.Symptoms diagnosis: a mathematical analysis of epigastric pain. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1963, 59, 145–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Ross, P., & Dutton, A. M.Computer analysis of symptom complexes in patients having upper gastrointestinal examinations. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 1972, 17, 248–54.Google Scholar
9.Scheinok, P. A., & Rinaldo, J. A. Jr, Symptom diagnosis: optimal subsets for upper abdominal pain. Computers and Biomedical Research. 1967, 1, 221–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Colcher, H.Current concepts, gastrointestinal endoscopy. New England Journal of Medicine, 1975, 293, 1129–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Marton, K. I., Sox, H. C., Wasson, J., & Duisenberg, C. E.The clinical value of the upper gastrointestinal tract roentgenogram series. Archives of Internal Medicine, 1980, 140, 191–5.Google Scholar
12.Mead, G. M., Morris, A., Webster, G. K., & Langman, M. J. S.Uses of barium meal examination in dyspeptic patients under 50. British Medical Journal, 1977, 1, 1460–1.Google Scholar
13.Liebling, P. O.The use and abuse of barium meals. Practitioner, 1966, 196, 695–702.Google Scholar
14.Gear, M. W. L., & Barnes, R. J.Endoscopic studies of dyspepsia in a general practice. British Medical Journal, 1980, 280, 1136–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Fisher, J. A., Surridge, J. G., Vartan, C. P., & Loehry, C. A.Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy—a GP service. British Medical Journal, 1977, 2, 1199–1201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Vennes, J. A., & Silverstein, F. E. UGI fiberoptic endoscopy. In Sleisenger, M. H. & Fordtran, J. S. (Eds.) Gastrointestinal Disease. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1983, 1599–1615.Google Scholar
17.Hirschowitz, B. I.Endoscopic examination of the stomach and duodenal cap with the fiberscope. Lancet, 1961, 1, 1074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Showstack, J. A., Schroeder, S. A., & Steinberg, H. R.Evaluating the costs and benefits of a diagnostic technology. Medical Care, 1981, 19, 498–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Tedesco, F. J., Griffin, J. W., Crisp, W. I., & Anthony, H. F. Jr, Skinny upper gastrointestinal endoscopy—the initial diagnostic tool: a prospective comparison of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and radiology. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 1980, 2, 27–30.Google Scholar
20.Silvis, S. E., Nebel, O., & Rogers, G.Endoscopic complications: Results of the 1974 American Society for Gastroenterology Survey. Journal of the American Medical As sociation, 1976, 235, 928–30.Google Scholar
21.American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The Role of Endoscopy in the Management of Patients with Duodenal Disease, Guidelines for Clinical Application. The Standards of Training and Practice Committee. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1978.Google Scholar
22.Richardson, C. T. Gastric ulcer. In Sleisenger, M. H., & Fordtran, J. S. (Eds.) Gastrointestinal Disease, Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1983, 672–93.Google Scholar
23.Spiro, H.Clinical Gastroenterology. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1983, 304–54.Google Scholar
24.The Redbook Drug Topic. Oradell, N.J.: Medical Economics Co., 1984, 68, 311.Google Scholar
25.Newhouse, J., Manning, W., Morris, C. et al. , Some interim results from a controlled trial of cost sharing in health insurance. New England Journal of Medicine, 1981, 305, 501–7.Google Scholar
26.Cady, B., Ramdsen, D., Stein, A., & Haggitt, R. C.Gastric cancer: contemporary aspects. American Journal of Surgery, 1977, 133, 423–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Morrissey, J. F.The diagnosis of early gastric cancer: A survey of experience in the United States. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1976, 23, 13–5.Google Scholar
28.Adashek, K., Sanger, J., & Longmire, W. P.Cancer of the stomach: Review of con secutive ten year intervals. Annals of Surgery, 1979, 189, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Dupont, J. B., Rillens, Lee J., Burton, G. R., & Cohn, I. Jr, Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: Review of 1, 497 cases. Cancer, 1978, 41, 941–7.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Olearchyk, A. S.Gastric carcinoma: A critical review of 243 cases. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 1978, 70, 25–45.Google ScholarPubMed
31.Evans, D. M. D., Craven, J. L., Murphy, F., Cleary, B. K.Comparison of early gastric cancer in Britain and Japan. Gut, 1978, 19, 1–9.Google Scholar
32.Sugawa, C., & Schuman, B. M.Primer of Gastrointestinal Fiberoptic Endoscopy. Boston: Little Brown & Co., 1981.Google Scholar
33.Kasuagi, T., & Kobayashi, S.Evaluation of biopsy and cytology in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 1974, 62, 199.Google Scholar
34.Isenberg, J. I., Peterson, W. L., Elashoff, J. D. et al. , Healing of benign gastric ulcer with low-dose antacid or cimetidine: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. New England Journal of Medicine, 1983, 308, 1319–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Pipe, D. W., Shinners, J., Greig, M., Thomas, J., & Waller, S. L.Effect of ulcer healing on the prognosis of chronic gastric ulcer. Gut, 1978, 19, 419–24.Google Scholar
36.Jensen, K. B., Mollmann, K. M., Rahbek, I., Madsen, J. R., Rune, S. J., & Wulff, H. R.Prophylactic effect of cimetidine in gastric ulcer patients. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1979, 14, 175–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Machell, R. J., Ciclitira, P. J., Farthing, M. J. G., Dick, A. P., & Hunter, J. O.Cimetidine in the prevention of gastric ulcer relapse. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 1979, 55, 393–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Ippoliti, A. F., Sturdevant, R. A., Isenberg, J. I. et al. , Cimetidine versus intensive antacid therapy for duodenal ulcer. Gastroenterology, 1978, 74, 393–5.Google Scholar
39.Greenlaw, R., Sheahan, D. C., DeLuca, V. A., Miller, D., Myerson, D., & Myerson, P.Gastroduodenitis—a broader concept of peptic ulcer disease. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 1980, 25, 660–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.DeLuca, V. A., Winnan, G., Sheahan, D. C. et al. , Is gastroduodenitis part of the spectrum of peptic ulcer disease? Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 1981, 3, 17–22.Google ScholarPubMed
41.Lagarde, S., & Spiro, H.Non-ulcer dyspepsia. Clinical Gastroenterology, 1984, 13, 437–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Waye, I. D.The current state of esophagoscopy, gastroscopy, and duodenoscopy. Mt. Sinai Journal of Medicine, 1975, 42, 57–80.Google Scholar
43.Knutson, C. O., Max, M. H., Ahmad, W., & Polk, H. C. Jr, Should flexible fiberoptic endoscopy replace barium contrast study of the upper gastrointestinal tract? Surgery, 1978, 84, 609–15.Google ScholarPubMed
44.Martin, T. R., Vennes, J. A., Silvis, S. E., & Ansel, H. J.A comparison of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and radiography. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 1980, 2, 21–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Martin, T. R., Vennes, J. A., Silvis, S. E., & Ansel, H. J., UGI endoscopy vs. radiography: Is radiography obsolete? Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 1980, 2, 27–30.Google Scholar
46.Montagne, J., Moss, A. A., & Margulis, A. R.Double-blind study of single and double contrast upper gastrointestinal examinations using endoscopy as a control. American Journal of Roentgenology, 1978, 130, 1041–5.Google Scholar
47.Tedesco, F. J., Best, W. R., Littman, A. et al. , Role of gastroscopy in gastric ulcer patients: planning a prospective study. Gastroenterology, 1977, 73, 170–3.Google Scholar
48.Weinstein, W. M.Gastroscopy for gastric ulcer. Gastroenterology, 1977, 73, 1160–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49.Cumberland, D. C.Fibre-optic endoscopy and radiology in the investigation of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Clinical Radiology, 1975, 26, 223–36.Google Scholar
50.Dekker, W., & Tytgat, G. N.Diagnostic accuracy of fiber-endoscopy in the detection of upper intestinal malignancy, a follow-up analysis. Gastroenterology, 1977, 73, 710–4.Google Scholar
51.Herlinger, H., Glanville, J. N., & Kreel, L.An evaluation of the double contrast barium meal (DCBM) against endoscopy. British Medical Journal, 1977, 28, 307–14.Google Scholar
52.Laufer, I., Mullens, J. E., & Hamilton, J.The diagnostic accuracy of barium studies of the stomach and duodenum—correlation with endoscopy. Radiology, 1975, 115, 569–73.Google Scholar
53.Laufer, I.Assessment of the accuracy of double contrast gastroduodenal radiology. Gastroenterology, 1976, 71, 874–8.Google Scholar
54.Rogers, I. M., Sokhi, G. S., Moule, B., Joffe, S. N., & Blumgart, L. H.Endoscopy and routine and double-contrast barium meal in diagnosis of gastric and duodenal disorders. Lancet, 1976, 1, 901–2.Google Scholar
55.Salter, R. H.Upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy in perspective. Lancet, 1975, 2, 863–4.Google Scholar
56.Schuman, B. M.The gastroscopic yield from the negative upper gastrointestinal series. Gastroenterological Endoscopy, 1972, 19, 79–82.Google Scholar